Emotional literacy programme in special schools for children with a learning disability in England: the ZF-SEND feasibility RCT.

Biza Stenfert Kroese, Gemma Unwin, Richard Hastings, Andrew Jahoda, Rachel McNamara, David Gillespie, Jeremy Segrott, Kate Ingarfield, Myrsini Gianatsi, Elizabeth Randell, Zoe Mather, Barbara Barrett, Poushali Ganguli, John Rose, Mariam Sahle, Emily Warren, Nathan Da Cruz
{"title":"Emotional literacy programme in special schools for children with a learning disability in England: the ZF-SEND feasibility RCT.","authors":"Biza Stenfert Kroese, Gemma Unwin, Richard Hastings, Andrew Jahoda, Rachel McNamara, David Gillespie, Jeremy Segrott, Kate Ingarfield, Myrsini Gianatsi, Elizabeth Randell, Zoe Mather, Barbara Barrett, Poushali Ganguli, John Rose, Mariam Sahle, Emily Warren, Nathan Da Cruz","doi":"10.3310/JTJY8001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children with a learning disability experience a range of inequalities and adverse life events that put them at greater risk of mental health problems. The construct of emotional literacy has been shown to be a moderating factor of how life stress affects mental health. Teaching emotional literacy in schools may therefore be an effective way to promote positive mental health. There is an identified need for adapted emotional literacy programmes in special schools.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate whether it is feasible to conduct a large-scale randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an emotional literacy programme (Zippy's Friends special educational needs and disabilities) for children with a learning disability in special schools. The key aims were to assess the acceptability and feasibility of participating in the trial, data collection and the Zippy's Friends special educational needs and disabilities intervention through quantitative and qualitative data collection.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A feasibility, cluster randomised controlled trial that aimed to recruit and randomise 12 special schools to either deliver the intervention over 1 academic year or continue with practice as usual and to collect data from 96 pupils at baseline (pre randomisation) and 12 months post randomisation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Special schools in England and Scotland.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Pupils with a learning disability, aged 9-11 years, attending special schools in England. Follow-up interviews were conducted with 8 pupils, 4 parents/carers and 11 school staff members.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Zippy's Friends for Special Educational Needs and Disabilities is a manual-based, classroom-based emotional literacy programme focused on a problem-solving approach to develop and improve children's emotional literacy. The mainstream programme has been adapted for children with a learning disability by simplifying the activities, shortening the sessions and introducing more repetition.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Feasibility and acceptability of: (1) participation in the research trial; (2) the collection of the outcome measure data and (3) the Zippy's Friends for Special Educational Needs and Disabilities intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8 schools and 53 pupils were recruited. Retention of schools after randomisation (100%) and retention of pupils (100%) met the prespecified progression criteria. For recruitment of schools (20.5% of those approached), pupil engagement with the intervention (50%) and collection of outcome and service use data (62.3%) the criteria were partially met. Fidelity of the intervention delivery (48%) fell just below the progression criteria. Thus, the feasibility and acceptability outcome progression criteria were largely met, suggesting that progression to a full trial is warranted with amendments to the study design.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This feasibility trial was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in unusually high absences of pupils and teachers, different classroom arrangements (bubbles) and unprecedented stress and emotional challenges for pupils, parents and teaching staff. The findings are therefore specific to that period and all three main outcomes of this feasibility trial were adversely affected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study indicate that a large-scale randomised controlled trial is feasible provided that a number of amendments to the study design are made to improve: (1) the timing of the project to suit the demands of special schools' yearly timetable; (2) recruitment and (3) outcome and service use data collection.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>On the basis of the current findings, an application for a full trial will be prepared and submitted with a number of amendments.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial is registered as ISRCTN83610691.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR129064) and is published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 12, No. 15. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.</p>","PeriodicalId":74615,"journal":{"name":"Public health research (Southampton, England)","volume":"12 15","pages":"1-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public health research (Southampton, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/JTJY8001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Children with a learning disability experience a range of inequalities and adverse life events that put them at greater risk of mental health problems. The construct of emotional literacy has been shown to be a moderating factor of how life stress affects mental health. Teaching emotional literacy in schools may therefore be an effective way to promote positive mental health. There is an identified need for adapted emotional literacy programmes in special schools.

Objectives: To evaluate whether it is feasible to conduct a large-scale randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an emotional literacy programme (Zippy's Friends special educational needs and disabilities) for children with a learning disability in special schools. The key aims were to assess the acceptability and feasibility of participating in the trial, data collection and the Zippy's Friends special educational needs and disabilities intervention through quantitative and qualitative data collection.

Design: A feasibility, cluster randomised controlled trial that aimed to recruit and randomise 12 special schools to either deliver the intervention over 1 academic year or continue with practice as usual and to collect data from 96 pupils at baseline (pre randomisation) and 12 months post randomisation.

Setting: Special schools in England and Scotland.

Participants: Pupils with a learning disability, aged 9-11 years, attending special schools in England. Follow-up interviews were conducted with 8 pupils, 4 parents/carers and 11 school staff members.

Intervention: Zippy's Friends for Special Educational Needs and Disabilities is a manual-based, classroom-based emotional literacy programme focused on a problem-solving approach to develop and improve children's emotional literacy. The mainstream programme has been adapted for children with a learning disability by simplifying the activities, shortening the sessions and introducing more repetition.

Main outcome measures: Feasibility and acceptability of: (1) participation in the research trial; (2) the collection of the outcome measure data and (3) the Zippy's Friends for Special Educational Needs and Disabilities intervention.

Results: A total of 8 schools and 53 pupils were recruited. Retention of schools after randomisation (100%) and retention of pupils (100%) met the prespecified progression criteria. For recruitment of schools (20.5% of those approached), pupil engagement with the intervention (50%) and collection of outcome and service use data (62.3%) the criteria were partially met. Fidelity of the intervention delivery (48%) fell just below the progression criteria. Thus, the feasibility and acceptability outcome progression criteria were largely met, suggesting that progression to a full trial is warranted with amendments to the study design.

Limitations: This feasibility trial was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in unusually high absences of pupils and teachers, different classroom arrangements (bubbles) and unprecedented stress and emotional challenges for pupils, parents and teaching staff. The findings are therefore specific to that period and all three main outcomes of this feasibility trial were adversely affected.

Conclusions: The findings of this study indicate that a large-scale randomised controlled trial is feasible provided that a number of amendments to the study design are made to improve: (1) the timing of the project to suit the demands of special schools' yearly timetable; (2) recruitment and (3) outcome and service use data collection.

Future work: On the basis of the current findings, an application for a full trial will be prepared and submitted with a number of amendments.

Trial registration: This trial is registered as ISRCTN83610691.

Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR129064) and is published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 12, No. 15. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国特殊学校学习障碍儿童情感素养项目:ZF-SEND可行性随机对照试验。
背景:有学习障碍的儿童经历了一系列不平等和不利的生活事件,使他们面临更大的心理健康问题风险。情绪素养的构建已被证明是生活压力如何影响心理健康的调节因素。因此,在学校教授情感素养可能是促进积极心理健康的有效途径。在特殊学校中,已经确定需要适应的情感素养课程。目的:评估对特殊学校学习障碍儿童的情感素养项目(Zippy的朋友特殊教育需求和残疾)的有效性和成本效益进行大规模随机对照试验的可行性。主要目的是通过定量和定性的数据收集来评估参与试验的可接受性和可行性,数据收集和Zippy的朋友的特殊教育需求和残疾干预。设计:一项可行性、集群随机对照试验,旨在招募和随机选择12所特殊学校,在1学年以上提供干预,或继续像往常一样进行实践,并收集96名学生在基线(随机化前)和随机化后12个月的数据。背景:英格兰和苏格兰的特殊学校。参与者:在英国特殊学校就读的9-11岁有学习障碍的学生。随访访问了8名学生、4名家长/照顾者和11名学校教职员。干预:Zippy的特殊教育需要和残疾的朋友是一个基于手册的,基于课堂的情感素养计划,专注于解决问题的方法来发展和提高儿童的情感素养。通过简化活动、缩短课程时间和增加重复次数,为有学习障碍的儿童调整了主流课程。主要结局指标:可行性和可接受性:(1)参与研究试验;(2)结果测量数据的收集和(3)Zippy的特殊教育需要和残疾的朋友干预。结果:共招募8所学校53名学生。随机化后学校的保留率(100%)和学生的保留率(100%)符合预先规定的进展标准。在招募学校(20.5%)、学生参与干预(50%)和收集结果和服务使用数据(62.3%)方面,标准部分得到满足。干预交付的保真度(48%)刚好低于进展标准。因此,可行性和可接受性结果进展标准在很大程度上得到满足,这表明通过修改研究设计,进展到完整试验是有必要的。局限性:本可行性试验是在新冠肺炎大流行期间进行的,导致学生和教师的缺勤率异常高,教室安排不同(泡沫),学生、家长和教职员工面临前所未有的压力和情感挑战。因此,调查结果是针对该时期的,可行性试验的所有三个主要结果都受到不利影响。结论:本研究的结果表明,如果对研究设计进行了一些修改,则可以进行大规模随机对照试验,以改善:(1)项目的时间安排以适应特殊学校的年度时间表的要求;(2)招聘和(3)结果和服务使用数据收集。今后的工作:根据目前的调查结果,将编写一份全面试验的申请,并提交若干修正案。试验注册:本试验注册号为ISRCTN83610691。资助:该奖项由美国国家卫生与保健研究所(NIHR)公共卫生研究计划(NIHR奖号:NIHR129064)资助,全文发表在《公共卫生研究》上;第12卷,第15期有关进一步的奖励信息,请参阅美国国立卫生研究院资助和奖励网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Innovation and diversity in public health team engagement in local alcohol premises licensing: qualitative interview findings from the ExILEnS study. Public engagement to refine a whole-school intervention to promote adolescent mental health. Interventions to improve mental health and well-being in care-experienced children and young people aged less than 25: the CHIMES systematic review. Emotional literacy programme in special schools for children with a learning disability in England: the ZF-SEND feasibility RCT. Impact of short-term aircraft noise on cardiovascular disease risk in the area surrounding London Heathrow airport: the RISTANCO epidemiological study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1