Tatiana Abou-Mrad, Laura Stone McGuire, Syed I Khalid, Peter Theiss, Ali Alaraj, Fady T Charbel
{"title":"Concurrent meningioma and intracranial aneurysm: Insights from an updated systematic review and a case report.","authors":"Tatiana Abou-Mrad, Laura Stone McGuire, Syed I Khalid, Peter Theiss, Ali Alaraj, Fady T Charbel","doi":"10.25259/SNI_699_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The concurrent presentation of meningioma and intracranial aneurysm (IA) poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, with no standardized management protocol available. This study aims to address this through an updated systematic review, delineating optimal strategies for managing this dual pathology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. Articles were screened independently by two reviewers. Treatment strategies and patient outcomes were comprehensively analyzed to formulate a treatment framework based on several characteristics. In addition, one concurrent meningioma and IA case from our institution was presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 69 articles comprising 115 patients were included in the study. The cohort exhibited a female predominance (80%) with a mean age of 56 (±13) years. Meningiomas were primarily localized to the frontotemporal and sellar regions, while aneurysms favored the anterior circulation - notably, 16.5% of cases presented with ruptured aneurysms. Management strategies varied based on the spatial relationship between lesions and aneurysm rupture status. In unruptured cases, 34% underwent a single craniotomy for simultaneous resection of both pathologies, while endovascular intervention was favored when the IA originated from an artery feeding the meningioma (73%). Remarkably, postoperative aneurysm rupture occurred in 33% of cases managed solely through tumor resection (range 0-30 days postop).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study proposes a comprehensive treatment algorithm to guide neurosurgeons in managing concurrent meningioma and IA cases. By considering individual patient intricacies, the feasibility of simultaneous management, aneurysm rupture risk, and symptomatology, this framework is a valuable tool for clinical decision-making in these complex scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":94217,"journal":{"name":"Surgical neurology international","volume":"15 ","pages":"396"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618779/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical neurology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_699_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The concurrent presentation of meningioma and intracranial aneurysm (IA) poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, with no standardized management protocol available. This study aims to address this through an updated systematic review, delineating optimal strategies for managing this dual pathology.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. Articles were screened independently by two reviewers. Treatment strategies and patient outcomes were comprehensively analyzed to formulate a treatment framework based on several characteristics. In addition, one concurrent meningioma and IA case from our institution was presented.
Results: A total of 69 articles comprising 115 patients were included in the study. The cohort exhibited a female predominance (80%) with a mean age of 56 (±13) years. Meningiomas were primarily localized to the frontotemporal and sellar regions, while aneurysms favored the anterior circulation - notably, 16.5% of cases presented with ruptured aneurysms. Management strategies varied based on the spatial relationship between lesions and aneurysm rupture status. In unruptured cases, 34% underwent a single craniotomy for simultaneous resection of both pathologies, while endovascular intervention was favored when the IA originated from an artery feeding the meningioma (73%). Remarkably, postoperative aneurysm rupture occurred in 33% of cases managed solely through tumor resection (range 0-30 days postop).
Conclusion: This study proposes a comprehensive treatment algorithm to guide neurosurgeons in managing concurrent meningioma and IA cases. By considering individual patient intricacies, the feasibility of simultaneous management, aneurysm rupture risk, and symptomatology, this framework is a valuable tool for clinical decision-making in these complex scenarios.
背景:脑膜瘤和颅内动脉瘤(IA)同时出现给诊断和治疗带来了挑战,目前尚无标准化的治疗方案。本研究旨在通过更新的系统综述来解决这一问题,描述管理这种双重病理的最佳策略。方法:对PubMed、Web of Science和Embase数据库进行系统评价。文章由两位审稿人独立筛选。综合分析治疗策略和患者结果,制定基于几个特征的治疗框架。此外,我们也报告了本院一例脑膜瘤合并IA的病例。结果:共纳入69篇文献,115例患者。该队列显示女性优势(80%),平均年龄为56(±13)岁。脑膜瘤主要局限于额颞和鞍区,而动脉瘤倾向于前循环——值得注意的是,16.5%的病例表现为动脉瘤破裂。治疗策略根据病变与动脉瘤破裂状态之间的空间关系而变化。在未破裂的病例中,34%的患者接受了一次开颅手术,同时切除了两种病变,而当IA起源于脑膜瘤的动脉时,血管内介入治疗更受欢迎(73%)。值得注意的是,33%的病例术后仅通过肿瘤切除(术后0-30天)发生动脉瘤破裂。结论:本研究提出了一种综合治疗算法,指导神经外科医生处理脑膜瘤合并IA病例。通过考虑个体患者的复杂性、同时治疗的可行性、动脉瘤破裂风险和症状学,该框架是在这些复杂情况下临床决策的宝贵工具。