Speckle-tracking echocardiography of left and right ventricle and acute cellular rejection in orthotropic heart transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eleni Xourgia, Kristina Brignoli, Olivier Linder, Alexandra-Maria Neagoe, Lukas Capek, Jolie Bruno, Eva Strickler, Adam Bakula, Maryam Pavlicek-Bahlo, Monika Fürholz, Christian Muster, Patrizia Malagutti, Michele Martinelli, Lukas Hunziker, Bruno Schnegg
{"title":"Speckle-tracking echocardiography of left and right ventricle and acute cellular rejection in orthotropic heart transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Eleni Xourgia, Kristina Brignoli, Olivier Linder, Alexandra-Maria Neagoe, Lukas Capek, Jolie Bruno, Eva Strickler, Adam Bakula, Maryam Pavlicek-Bahlo, Monika Fürholz, Christian Muster, Patrizia Malagutti, Michele Martinelli, Lukas Hunziker, Bruno Schnegg","doi":"10.1007/s10554-024-03297-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After a cardiac transplantation, the steering of immunosuppression requires an active search for acute cellular rejection (ACR). Surveillance with endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is the gold standard. Given the costs and potential complications, there is growing interest in the use of non-invasive screening methods. Thus, we have conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of speckle-tracking echocardiography as a screening method for ACR. We searched PubMed (CENTRAL) and gray literature for studies presenting data on speckle tracking echocardiography in heart-transplant patients experiencing acute cellular rejection. The primary outcomes of the meta-analysis were left and right ventricular global longitudinal strain. We used random effects models for all our calculations. We pre-registered our meta-analysis with PROSPERO (CRD42024508654). By incorporating data from over 2000 biopsies included in 18 studies, we found that both left (LVGLS, MD -1.96, 95% CI -2.85 to -1.07, p < 0.0001), and right (RVGLS, MD -2.90, 95% CI -4.03 to -1.76, p < 0.00001) ventricular longitudinal strain were lower among patients without ACR. The change of LVGLS from baseline over time was also greater among patients experiencing ACR (MD -2.43, 95% CI -4.82 to -0.05, p = 0.045). Current data suggest that myocardial strain measured by speckle tracking echocardiography is affected in ACR and could potentially be used for early rejection detection as a rule-out strategy, leading to reduction of routine EMB in heart transplant follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03297-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After a cardiac transplantation, the steering of immunosuppression requires an active search for acute cellular rejection (ACR). Surveillance with endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is the gold standard. Given the costs and potential complications, there is growing interest in the use of non-invasive screening methods. Thus, we have conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of speckle-tracking echocardiography as a screening method for ACR. We searched PubMed (CENTRAL) and gray literature for studies presenting data on speckle tracking echocardiography in heart-transplant patients experiencing acute cellular rejection. The primary outcomes of the meta-analysis were left and right ventricular global longitudinal strain. We used random effects models for all our calculations. We pre-registered our meta-analysis with PROSPERO (CRD42024508654). By incorporating data from over 2000 biopsies included in 18 studies, we found that both left (LVGLS, MD -1.96, 95% CI -2.85 to -1.07, p < 0.0001), and right (RVGLS, MD -2.90, 95% CI -4.03 to -1.76, p < 0.00001) ventricular longitudinal strain were lower among patients without ACR. The change of LVGLS from baseline over time was also greater among patients experiencing ACR (MD -2.43, 95% CI -4.82 to -0.05, p = 0.045). Current data suggest that myocardial strain measured by speckle tracking echocardiography is affected in ACR and could potentially be used for early rejection detection as a rule-out strategy, leading to reduction of routine EMB in heart transplant follow-up.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斑点跟踪超声心动图左、右心室和急性细胞排斥在原位异位心脏移植:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
心脏移植后,免疫抑制的转向需要积极寻找急性细胞排斥反应(ACR)。心内膜心肌活检(EMB)监测是金标准。考虑到成本和潜在的并发症,人们对使用非侵入性筛查方法的兴趣越来越大。因此,我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估斑点跟踪超声心动图作为ACR筛查方法的作用。我们检索了PubMed (CENTRAL)和灰色文献,以获得斑点跟踪超声心动图在心脏移植患者急性细胞排斥反应中的研究数据。荟萃分析的主要结果是左心室和右心室整体纵向应变。我们使用随机效应模型进行所有的计算。我们的meta分析在PROSPERO (CRD42024508654)进行了预注册。通过合并18项研究中超过2000例活检的数据,我们发现左(LVGLS, MD -1.96, 95% CI -2.85至-1.07,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characterization of epicardial adipose tissue thickness and structure by ultrasound radiomics in acute and chronic coronary patients. Redundant and aneurysmal interatrial septum motion: a commentary on anatomical factors and clinical implications. Comparison of global and regional myocardial blood flow quantification using dynamic solid-state detector SPECT and Tc-99 m-sestamibi or Tc-99 m-tetrofosmin in a routine clinical setting. Myocardial extracellular volume fraction estimations using late enhancement CT in patients with atrial fibrillation: a comparative study with cardiac MR. When a common sore throat unmasks a rare disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1