Influence of seismometer misorientation on crustal thickness and Vp/Vs estimated with teleseismic P-wave receiver functions

IF 2.7 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Tectonophysics Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1016/j.tecto.2024.230577
Diogo Farrapo Albuquerque, Marcelo Peres Rocha, George Sand França, Marcelo Bianchi, Reinhardt A. Fuck
{"title":"Influence of seismometer misorientation on crustal thickness and Vp/Vs estimated with teleseismic P-wave receiver functions","authors":"Diogo Farrapo Albuquerque, Marcelo Peres Rocha, George Sand França, Marcelo Bianchi, Reinhardt A. Fuck","doi":"10.1016/j.tecto.2024.230577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyzed the influence of seismometer misorientation on crustal thickness and Vp/Vs estimated with teleseismic P-wave receiver functions simulating orientation errors during the rotation procedure of the horizontal components from true NS-EW (North-South, East-West) to RT (Radial-Tangential) coordinate system. During this procedure, we incrementally added 5° to the azimuth of the NS and EW components. The influence of the misorientation on P-wave teleseismic receiver functions was confirmed by the analysis of different parameters, such as normalized amplitude of P, Ps and multiple phases, reproduction of the radial component and crustal thickness and Vp/Vs estimates. This analysis indicated |45°| as the maximum misorientation allowed to consider crustal thickness, Vp/Vs, and geophysical interpretation reliable. For misorientations larger than |75°|, the reliability is low, and the data could be considered inappropriate for receiver function technique and crustal studies. We also identified some signs of misorientation: P-wave polarity inversion in radial RF trace combined with strong P-wave troughs in the tangential one, low Ps-wave normalized amplitude, reproduction of the radial lower than 90 % for most receiver function traces, and large standard deviations in crustal thickness and Vp/Vs estimates. Since most of the seismometers deployed at Brazilian Seismographic Network were well oriented (only three have orientation errors larger than 45°), in general, previous studies that used data from those stations for estimating crustal thickness and Vp/Vs using the H-k method are reliable. However, in future versions of Brazilian crustal models, the estimates using stations with misorientation larger than |45°| must be recalculated applying an azimuth correction. Finally, since normalized amplitudes are very sensitive to misorientation, the analysis of P and Ps amplitudes in radial receiver functions can be used as a tool to estimate seismometer orientation error and other issues affecting station gain.","PeriodicalId":22257,"journal":{"name":"Tectonophysics","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tectonophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2024.230577","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We analyzed the influence of seismometer misorientation on crustal thickness and Vp/Vs estimated with teleseismic P-wave receiver functions simulating orientation errors during the rotation procedure of the horizontal components from true NS-EW (North-South, East-West) to RT (Radial-Tangential) coordinate system. During this procedure, we incrementally added 5° to the azimuth of the NS and EW components. The influence of the misorientation on P-wave teleseismic receiver functions was confirmed by the analysis of different parameters, such as normalized amplitude of P, Ps and multiple phases, reproduction of the radial component and crustal thickness and Vp/Vs estimates. This analysis indicated |45°| as the maximum misorientation allowed to consider crustal thickness, Vp/Vs, and geophysical interpretation reliable. For misorientations larger than |75°|, the reliability is low, and the data could be considered inappropriate for receiver function technique and crustal studies. We also identified some signs of misorientation: P-wave polarity inversion in radial RF trace combined with strong P-wave troughs in the tangential one, low Ps-wave normalized amplitude, reproduction of the radial lower than 90 % for most receiver function traces, and large standard deviations in crustal thickness and Vp/Vs estimates. Since most of the seismometers deployed at Brazilian Seismographic Network were well oriented (only three have orientation errors larger than 45°), in general, previous studies that used data from those stations for estimating crustal thickness and Vp/Vs using the H-k method are reliable. However, in future versions of Brazilian crustal models, the estimates using stations with misorientation larger than |45°| must be recalculated applying an azimuth correction. Finally, since normalized amplitudes are very sensitive to misorientation, the analysis of P and Ps amplitudes in radial receiver functions can be used as a tool to estimate seismometer orientation error and other issues affecting station gain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地震仪方位偏差对用远震纵波接收函数估计地壳厚度和Vp/Vs的影响
利用远震p波接收函数模拟水平分量从真NS-EW(南北、东西)到RT(径向-切向)坐标系旋转过程中的方位误差,分析了地震仪方位误差对地壳厚度和Vp/Vs的影响。在此过程中,我们在NS和EW分量的方位角上增加了5°。通过对P、P和多相归一化振幅、径向分量再现、地壳厚度和Vp/Vs估算等参数的分析,证实了取向偏差对P波远震接收函数的影响。该分析表明,| - 45°|是允许考虑地壳厚度、Vp/Vs和地球物理解释可靠的最大定向偏差。当定向偏差大于bbb75°|时,可靠性较低,数据可能被认为不适合接收函数技术和地壳研究。我们还发现了一些定向错误的迹象:径向射频道的p波极性反转与切向的强p波波谷相结合,低p波归一化振幅,大多数接收函数道的径向再现低于90%,以及地壳厚度和Vp/Vs估计的大标准差。由于巴西地震台网部署的大多数地震仪定向良好(只有3台的定向误差大于45°),一般来说,以前使用这些台站的数据使用H-k方法估计地壳厚度和Vp/Vs的研究是可靠的。然而,在巴西地壳模型的未来版本中,使用定向偏差大于45°|的台站的估计必须应用方位角校正重新计算。最后,由于归一化振幅对定向误差非常敏感,因此对径向接收函数中的P和P振幅的分析可以作为估计地震仪定向误差和影响站增益的其他问题的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tectonophysics
Tectonophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The prime focus of Tectonophysics will be high-impact original research and reviews in the fields of kinematics, structure, composition, and dynamics of the solid arth at all scales. Tectonophysics particularly encourages submission of papers based on the integration of a multitude of geophysical, geological, geochemical, geodynamic, and geotectonic methods
期刊最新文献
Reactivation of critically-stressed basement faults and related induced seismicity in the southeastern Sichuan basin Seismic reflection analysis of the Western Sichuan Basin: Implications for the decoupling relationship between deep and shallow structures Mixed-mode deformation in a rock bridge between two fault segments Stress evolution on the Kunlun fault under the influence of the laterally heterogeneous lower crust Structural style of the Guañacos Fold and Thrust Belt (southern Central Andes): A tectonic setting for the Cura Mallín Basin revisited
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1