Understanding Strategies to Reduce the Impact of Non-urgent Visits to the Pediatric Emergency Department: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003306
Erica Qureshi, Kelly Nguyen, Brett Burstein, Jessica Moe, Steven P Miller, Garth Meckler, Quynh Doan
{"title":"Understanding Strategies to Reduce the Impact of Non-urgent Visits to the Pediatric Emergency Department: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Erica Qureshi, Kelly Nguyen, Brett Burstein, Jessica Moe, Steven P Miller, Garth Meckler, Quynh Doan","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The pediatric emergency department (PED) is increasingly being used for non-urgent reasons. This impacts PED input and throughput, and contributes to overcrowding. To identify solutions, it is essential to identify and describe the approaches that have been trialed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We completed a scoping review to identify and then describe the design and outcomes of all initiatives undertaken to reduce the impact of non-urgent visits on the PED.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We searched 4 databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBM, and CINAHL) to identify research published from the database inception until March 31, 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Studies met our inclusion criteria if they focused on the pediatric ED, defined non-urgent visits, described an intervention (hypothesizing it would reduce the impact of non-urgent visits on the PED), and reported on the interventions impact.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>The title and abstract of each study were independently screened for inclusion by 2 reviewers (E.Q., K.N.), and disagreements were resolved by deliberation until consensus was achieved. This process was then repeated for the full text of all articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, we screened 11,600 articles and 20 were included. Nine interventions focused on PED input, 10 on PED throughput, and 1 on both PED input and throughput. Definitions of non-urgent visits and outcomes measures used to assess the effectiveness of an intervention differed between studies. Three types of strategies employed to reduce the impact of non-urgent visits on the PED were identified, these include (1) engaging nonpediatric emergency medicine clinicians by including them into the PED or connecting non-urgent patients to community locations for care, (2) reorganizing PED operations in anticipation of non-urgent visits, and (3) providing education to prevent future non-urgent visits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consistent definitions of non-urgent visits and standardized outcome measures may allow for more precise comparisons between studies. We identify 3 commonly employed strategies that may help reduce the impact of non-urgent visits on the PED.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003306","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: The pediatric emergency department (PED) is increasingly being used for non-urgent reasons. This impacts PED input and throughput, and contributes to overcrowding. To identify solutions, it is essential to identify and describe the approaches that have been trialed.

Objective: We completed a scoping review to identify and then describe the design and outcomes of all initiatives undertaken to reduce the impact of non-urgent visits on the PED.

Data sources: We searched 4 databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBM, and CINAHL) to identify research published from the database inception until March 31, 2024.

Study selection: Studies met our inclusion criteria if they focused on the pediatric ED, defined non-urgent visits, described an intervention (hypothesizing it would reduce the impact of non-urgent visits on the PED), and reported on the interventions impact.

Data extraction: The title and abstract of each study were independently screened for inclusion by 2 reviewers (E.Q., K.N.), and disagreements were resolved by deliberation until consensus was achieved. This process was then repeated for the full text of all articles.

Results: In total, we screened 11,600 articles and 20 were included. Nine interventions focused on PED input, 10 on PED throughput, and 1 on both PED input and throughput. Definitions of non-urgent visits and outcomes measures used to assess the effectiveness of an intervention differed between studies. Three types of strategies employed to reduce the impact of non-urgent visits on the PED were identified, these include (1) engaging nonpediatric emergency medicine clinicians by including them into the PED or connecting non-urgent patients to community locations for care, (2) reorganizing PED operations in anticipation of non-urgent visits, and (3) providing education to prevent future non-urgent visits.

Conclusions: Consistent definitions of non-urgent visits and standardized outcome measures may allow for more precise comparisons between studies. We identify 3 commonly employed strategies that may help reduce the impact of non-urgent visits on the PED.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解策略,以减少非紧急访问儿科急诊科的影响:范围审查。
背景:儿科急诊科(PED)越来越多地被用于非紧急原因。这影响了PED的投入和吞吐量,并导致过度拥挤。为了确定解决方案,必须确定和描述已经试验过的方法。目的:我们完成了一项范围审查,以确定并描述为减少非紧急访问对PED的影响而采取的所有举措的设计和结果。数据来源:我们检索了4个数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、EBM和CINAHL),以确定从数据库建立到2024年3月31日发表的研究。研究选择:如果研究集中在儿科急诊科,定义了非紧急就诊,描述了干预措施(假设它会减少非紧急就诊对急诊科的影响),并报告了干预措施的影响,则符合我们的纳入标准。资料提取:每项研究的标题和摘要由2位审稿人(E.Q, K.N.)独立筛选纳入,分歧通过审议解决,直至达成共识。然后对所有条款的全文重复这一过程。结果:我们共筛选了11,600篇文章,其中20篇被纳入。9项干预措施侧重于PED投入,10项干预措施侧重于PED吞吐量,1项干预措施侧重于PED投入和吞吐量。用于评估干预有效性的非紧急访问的定义和结果测量在研究之间存在差异。研究确定了三种减少非紧急就诊对PED影响的策略,包括:(1)通过将非儿科急诊医学临床医生纳入PED或将非紧急患者连接到社区地点进行护理,(2)根据非紧急就诊的预期重新组织PED操作,以及(3)提供教育以防止未来的非紧急就诊。结论:非紧急就诊的一致定义和标准化的结果测量可能允许更精确的研究之间的比较。我们确定了3种常用的策略,可以帮助减少非紧急访问对PED的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
期刊最新文献
Changes in Care in Spanish Pediatric Emergency Departments After the First Immunization With Nirsevimab. Pediatric Golf Cart Injuries and Morbidity: A Single-Center Trauma Experience. Reply: Evaluation of a Large Language Model on the American Academy of Pediatrics' PREP Emergency Medicine Question Bank. Impact of the Amount of Intravenous Glucose Administration on Hospitalization for Acute Gastroenteritis in a Pediatric Emergency Department. Changes in Seasonal Patterns for Common Pediatric Respiratory Viruses During the COVID Pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1