Assessing the Direct Impact of Death on Discrete Choice Experiment Utilities.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1007/s40258-024-00929-6
Hossein Ameri, Thomas G Poder
{"title":"Assessing the Direct Impact of Death on Discrete Choice Experiment Utilities.","authors":"Hossein Ameri, Thomas G Poder","doi":"10.1007/s40258-024-00929-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The dead state can affect the value sets derived from discrete choice experiments (DCEs). Our aim was to empirically assess the direct impact of the immediate death state on health utilities using discrete choice experiment with time (DCE<sub>TTO</sub>).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of the general population in Quebec, Canada, completed two approaches: DCE<sub>TTO</sub> followed by a best-worst scaling with time (BWS<sub>TTO</sub>) (hereafter referred to as DCE<sub>BWS</sub>), versus DCE<sub>TTO</sub> followed by the dominated option and the immediate death state (hereafter referred to as DCE<sub>DOD</sub>), both designed with the SF-6Dv2. In DCE<sub>BWS</sub>, all participants first completed 10 DCE<sub>TTO</sub> choices (i.e., option A vs B), followed by 3 BWS<sub>TTO</sub>. In DCE<sub>DOD</sub>, the same participants first completed the same 10 DCE<sub>TTO</sub> choices, followed by a repeated choice between the dominated option (i.e., A or B) and the immediate death state. A conditional logit model was used to estimate value sets. The performance of models was assessed using goodness of fit using Bayesian information criterion, parameters' logical consistency, and levels' significance. The direct impact of the death state on DCE latent utilities was evaluated by examining the magnitude of coefficients, assessing the agreement among the value sets estimated by DCE<sub>TTO</sub> with DCE<sub>BWS</sub> and with DCE<sub>DOD</sub> using Bland-Altman plots, the proportion of worst-than-dead (WTD) health states, and analyzing the range of estimated values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 398 participants, a total of 348 participants were included for final analysis. The number of parameters with illogical consistency and non-significant coefficients was lower in DCE<sub>BWS</sub>. The observed consistency in the relative importance of dimensions across all approaches suggests a stable and reliable ranking. The utility range for DCE<sub>DOD</sub> (- 0.921 to 1) was narrower than for DCE<sub>TTO</sub> (- 1.578 to 1) and DCE<sub>BWS</sub> (- 1.150 to 1). The DCE<sub>DOD</sub> estimated a lower percentage of WTD health states (20.01 %) compared to DCE<sub>TTO</sub> (47.19 %) and DCE<sub>BWS</sub> (33.73 %). The agreement between DCE<sub>TTO</sub> and DCE<sub>BWS</sub> was slightly stronger than between DCE<sub>TTO</sub> and DCE<sub>DOD</sub>, and the mean utility values were higher in DCE<sub>DOD</sub> than in DCE<sub>BWS</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The inclusion of the immediate death state directly within DCE increased utility values. This increase was higher when the immediate death was included in a sequence within a DCE<sub>TTO</sub> (i.e., DCE<sub>DOD</sub>) than when it was included in a continuum of DCE<sub>TTO</sub> (i.e., DCE<sub>BWS</sub>). The use of DCE<sub>DOD</sub> was potentially better suited to incorporate the dead state into a DCE.</p>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-024-00929-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The dead state can affect the value sets derived from discrete choice experiments (DCEs). Our aim was to empirically assess the direct impact of the immediate death state on health utilities using discrete choice experiment with time (DCETTO).

Methods: A sample of the general population in Quebec, Canada, completed two approaches: DCETTO followed by a best-worst scaling with time (BWSTTO) (hereafter referred to as DCEBWS), versus DCETTO followed by the dominated option and the immediate death state (hereafter referred to as DCEDOD), both designed with the SF-6Dv2. In DCEBWS, all participants first completed 10 DCETTO choices (i.e., option A vs B), followed by 3 BWSTTO. In DCEDOD, the same participants first completed the same 10 DCETTO choices, followed by a repeated choice between the dominated option (i.e., A or B) and the immediate death state. A conditional logit model was used to estimate value sets. The performance of models was assessed using goodness of fit using Bayesian information criterion, parameters' logical consistency, and levels' significance. The direct impact of the death state on DCE latent utilities was evaluated by examining the magnitude of coefficients, assessing the agreement among the value sets estimated by DCETTO with DCEBWS and with DCEDOD using Bland-Altman plots, the proportion of worst-than-dead (WTD) health states, and analyzing the range of estimated values.

Results: From 398 participants, a total of 348 participants were included for final analysis. The number of parameters with illogical consistency and non-significant coefficients was lower in DCEBWS. The observed consistency in the relative importance of dimensions across all approaches suggests a stable and reliable ranking. The utility range for DCEDOD (- 0.921 to 1) was narrower than for DCETTO (- 1.578 to 1) and DCEBWS (- 1.150 to 1). The DCEDOD estimated a lower percentage of WTD health states (20.01 %) compared to DCETTO (47.19 %) and DCEBWS (33.73 %). The agreement between DCETTO and DCEBWS was slightly stronger than between DCETTO and DCEDOD, and the mean utility values were higher in DCEDOD than in DCEBWS.

Conclusions: The inclusion of the immediate death state directly within DCE increased utility values. This increase was higher when the immediate death was included in a sequence within a DCETTO (i.e., DCEDOD) than when it was included in a continuum of DCETTO (i.e., DCEBWS). The use of DCEDOD was potentially better suited to incorporate the dead state into a DCE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy provides timely publication of cutting-edge research and expert opinion from this increasingly important field, making it a vital resource for payers, providers and researchers alike. The journal includes high quality economic research and reviews of all aspects of healthcare from various perspectives and countries, designed to communicate the latest applied information in health economics and health policy. While emphasis is placed on information with practical applications, a strong basis of underlying scientific rigor is maintained.
期刊最新文献
Cost-Effective and Sustainable Drug Use in Hospitals: A Systematic and Practice-Based Approach. Quality-Adjusted Life Expectancy Norms Based on the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 for China. Value is Gendered: The Need for Sex and Gender Considerations in Health Economic Evaluations. Assessing the Direct Impact of Death on Discrete Choice Experiment Utilities. Acknowledgement to Referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1