Patient-Centered Communication: Incorporating Principles of Dialogic Practice and Family Centered Rounds on an Inpatient Psychotic Disorders Unit.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Community Mental Health Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-07 DOI:10.1007/s10597-024-01398-w
Adrienne T Gerken, Dost Öngür, Soo Jin Kim, Boyu Ren, Thomaskutty Idiculla, Joseph Stoklosa
{"title":"Patient-Centered Communication: Incorporating Principles of Dialogic Practice and Family Centered Rounds on an Inpatient Psychotic Disorders Unit.","authors":"Adrienne T Gerken, Dost Öngür, Soo Jin Kim, Boyu Ren, Thomaskutty Idiculla, Joseph Stoklosa","doi":"10.1007/s10597-024-01398-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the impact of Patient-Centered Communication (PCC), Open Dialogue-inspired changes to rounding practices and culture, on patient perceptions of care on an inpatient psychotic disorders unit. A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted based on medical records, restraint and seclusion records, and hospital Perceptions of Care (PoC) surveys. The analysis compared data from 6-month periods before and after implementation of PCC to quantify whether the implementation of PCC was associated with more positive care ratings. There were trends toward improvement suggestive of an effect on patients' perception that their care was adequately explained, that they felt involved in care, that they felt respected, and that they were supported during hospitalization, although improvements did not achieve statistical significance. Greater improvement was observed for teams that incorporated a greater number of interventions. Dialogic practice-inspired changes on an acute inpatient unit may improve patient perceptions of inclusion and respect in their care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"394-400"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Mental Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-024-01398-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the impact of Patient-Centered Communication (PCC), Open Dialogue-inspired changes to rounding practices and culture, on patient perceptions of care on an inpatient psychotic disorders unit. A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted based on medical records, restraint and seclusion records, and hospital Perceptions of Care (PoC) surveys. The analysis compared data from 6-month periods before and after implementation of PCC to quantify whether the implementation of PCC was associated with more positive care ratings. There were trends toward improvement suggestive of an effect on patients' perception that their care was adequately explained, that they felt involved in care, that they felt respected, and that they were supported during hospitalization, although improvements did not achieve statistical significance. Greater improvement was observed for teams that incorporated a greater number of interventions. Dialogic practice-inspired changes on an acute inpatient unit may improve patient perceptions of inclusion and respect in their care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以病人为中心的沟通:结合对话实践原则和以家庭为中心的查房在住院精神病患者的单位。
本研究考察了以患者为中心的沟通(PCC)的影响,开放对话启发的变化,以四舍五入的做法和文化,对住院精神病患者护理单位的病人的看法。基于医疗记录、约束和隔离记录以及医院护理感知(PoC)调查,进行回顾性队列分析。该分析比较了实施PCC前后6个月的数据,以量化PCC的实施是否与更积极的护理评分相关。有一些改善的趋势表明,对患者的感知产生了影响,即他们的护理得到了充分的解释,他们感到参与了护理,他们感到受到尊重,他们在住院期间得到了支持,尽管改善没有达到统计学意义。对于纳入更多干预措施的团队,可以观察到更大的改善。在急性住院病房的对话实践启发的变化可能会提高患者对其护理的包容和尊重的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Community Mental Health Journal focuses on the needs of people experiencing serious forms of psychological distress, as well as the structures established to address those needs. Areas of particular interest include critical examination of current paradigms of diagnosis and treatment, socio-structural determinants of mental health, social hierarchies within the public mental health systems, and the intersection of public mental health programs and social/racial justice and health equity. While this is the journal of the American Association for Community Psychiatry, we welcome manuscripts reflecting research from a range of disciplines on recovery-oriented services, public health policy, clinical delivery systems, advocacy, and emerging and innovative practices.
期刊最新文献
Introduction to Special Issue on Recovery at 30: Emancipation, Cooptation, or the End of an Era? Autoethnographic Reflections on Mental Distress and Medication Management: Conceptualising Biomedical and Recovery Models of Mental Health. Antipsychotics and Identity: The Adverse Effect No One is Talking About. Promoting Reflection on the Process of Recovery: Unique Contributions from Literature and the Humanities for Practitioner. Neorecovery: A Critical Analysis of the Relationship between Neoliberalism and the Recovery Movement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1