Direct oral provocation test with beta-lactams in Brazilian children and adolescents.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Jornal de pediatria Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jped.2024.11.003
Nathália Mota Gomes de Almeida, Mara Morelo Rocha Felix, Maria Inês Perelló Lopes Ferreira, Fábio Chigres Kuschnir
{"title":"Direct oral provocation test with beta-lactams in Brazilian children and adolescents.","authors":"Nathália Mota Gomes de Almeida, Mara Morelo Rocha Felix, Maria Inês Perelló Lopes Ferreira, Fábio Chigres Kuschnir","doi":"10.1016/j.jped.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Beta-lactam (BL) allergy is considered a public health issue worldwide. To date, there is no consistent data on the direct Oral Provocation Test (OPT) for BL in Brazilian children and adolescents. This study's main objective is to describe the safety profile of direct OPT in this population.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted with patients aged 1 to 17 years with a history of mild immediate or delayed reactions to penicillin. The European Network of Drug Allergy (ENDA) questionnaire was used. The authors performed OPTs with amoxicillin over five days. Continuous variables were described using their means and standard deviations. Bivariate analysis between test positivity and other study variables was performed using the Chi-square test, odds ratio, and their respective 95 % confidence intervals (CI 95 %). A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 54 OPTs were performed, four were positive (7.5 %) and one was considered inconclusive. All reactors were boys and had delayed reactions, with no severe reactions, and three showed symptoms on the first day of testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>>90 % of the sample was delabeled as allergic to BL. There were no severe reactions, confirming the safety of direct OPT in this age group. Among the reactors, 3 patients presented symptoms on the first day of testing before receiving the second dose and one had symptoms on 5 days, indicating that further studies are needed on the optimal duration of the OPT.</p>","PeriodicalId":14867,"journal":{"name":"Jornal de pediatria","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2024.11.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Beta-lactam (BL) allergy is considered a public health issue worldwide. To date, there is no consistent data on the direct Oral Provocation Test (OPT) for BL in Brazilian children and adolescents. This study's main objective is to describe the safety profile of direct OPT in this population.

Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted with patients aged 1 to 17 years with a history of mild immediate or delayed reactions to penicillin. The European Network of Drug Allergy (ENDA) questionnaire was used. The authors performed OPTs with amoxicillin over five days. Continuous variables were described using their means and standard deviations. Bivariate analysis between test positivity and other study variables was performed using the Chi-square test, odds ratio, and their respective 95 % confidence intervals (CI 95 %). A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: In total, 54 OPTs were performed, four were positive (7.5 %) and one was considered inconclusive. All reactors were boys and had delayed reactions, with no severe reactions, and three showed symptoms on the first day of testing.

Conclusion: >90 % of the sample was delabeled as allergic to BL. There were no severe reactions, confirming the safety of direct OPT in this age group. Among the reactors, 3 patients presented symptoms on the first day of testing before receiving the second dose and one had symptoms on 5 days, indicating that further studies are needed on the optimal duration of the OPT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西儿童和青少年β -内酰胺直接口服激发试验。
目的:β -内酰胺(BL)过敏被认为是世界范围内的公共卫生问题。迄今为止,在巴西儿童和青少年中没有关于BL的直接口腔激发试验(OPT)的一致数据。本研究的主要目的是描述直接TPO在这一人群中的安全性。方法:对1 ~ 17岁有轻度即刻或延迟青霉素反应史的患者进行横断面研究。采用欧洲药物过敏网络(ENDA)问卷。作者使用阿莫西林进行了为期5天的opt。连续变量用其均值和标准差来描述。使用卡方检验、优势比和各自的95 %置信区间(CI 95 %)对检验阳性和其他研究变量进行双变量分析。p值< 0.05被认为是显著的。结果:共进行54例opt, 4例阳性(7.5% %),1例不确定。所有的反应堆都是男孩,反应迟缓,没有严重的反应,其中三个在测试的第一天就出现了症状。结论:>90 %的样本脱除BL过敏标签,无严重反应,证实了该年龄组直接OPT的安全性。其中3例患者在试验第一天出现症状,1例患者在第5天出现症状,提示OPT的最佳持续时间有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jornal de pediatria
Jornal de pediatria 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
93
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Jornal de Pediatria is a bimonthly publication of the Brazilian Society of Pediatrics (Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria, SBP). It has been published without interruption since 1934. Jornal de Pediatria publishes original articles and review articles covering various areas in the field of pediatrics. By publishing relevant scientific contributions, Jornal de Pediatria aims at improving the standards of pediatrics and of the healthcare provided for children and adolescents in general, as well to foster debate about health.
期刊最新文献
Impact of climate change and air pollution on childhood respiratory health. Worldwide prevalence of the double burden of malnutrition in children and adolescents at the individual level: systematic review and meta-regression. Renal scarring in children with febrile urinary tract infection. Evaluation of acquisition and retention of non-technical skills of residents submitted to interprofessional simulation-based training in pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Case-control study on long-term kidney outcomes in very low birth weight infants: impact of growth restriction and maternal preeclampsia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1