Institutional Betrayal in Military and Veteran Populations: A Systematic Scoping Review [Formula: see text].

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-07 DOI:10.1177/10783903241299720
Mikayla McAdams, Matthew W Henninger, Katharine Bloeser, Kelly K McCarron
{"title":"Institutional Betrayal in Military and Veteran Populations: A Systematic Scoping Review [Formula: see text].","authors":"Mikayla McAdams, Matthew W Henninger, Katharine Bloeser, Kelly K McCarron","doi":"10.1177/10783903241299720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>BACKGROUND:</b> Institutional betrayal (IB) refers to the wrongdoings, encompassing both action and inaction, committed by institutions against their affiliated individuals. Military members are particularly vulnerable to IB due to strong social identification with the military, values of loyalty and self-sacrifice, dependence on the institution, the military power structure and legal system, and the complexity of morality in an occupation centered around war. <b>AIMS:</b> This review examines the state of IB literature within the military/Veteran population, identifying research gaps and implications for future policy and clinical care. <b>METHODS:</b> Conducting a systematic scoping literature review across seven databases resulted in 16 eligible publications out of 44 found. <b>RESULTS:</b> Findings indicate a high prevalence of IB experiences within the studied population, correlating with increased psychiatric symptoms and clinical features. The existing literature primarily focuses on military sexual trauma, with limited exploration of IB in the context of combat, politics, return from deployment, illness, military exposures, and moral injury. <b>CONCLUSIONS:</b> Future research should expand on IB in other military experiences, evaluate intervention efficacy and policies, and validate a standardized IB measure. These insights highlight the need for provider education, revised assessments, and interventions tailored to address the complex impact of IB on military and Veteran populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association","volume":" ","pages":"8-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10783903241299720","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Institutional betrayal (IB) refers to the wrongdoings, encompassing both action and inaction, committed by institutions against their affiliated individuals. Military members are particularly vulnerable to IB due to strong social identification with the military, values of loyalty and self-sacrifice, dependence on the institution, the military power structure and legal system, and the complexity of morality in an occupation centered around war. AIMS: This review examines the state of IB literature within the military/Veteran population, identifying research gaps and implications for future policy and clinical care. METHODS: Conducting a systematic scoping literature review across seven databases resulted in 16 eligible publications out of 44 found. RESULTS: Findings indicate a high prevalence of IB experiences within the studied population, correlating with increased psychiatric symptoms and clinical features. The existing literature primarily focuses on military sexual trauma, with limited exploration of IB in the context of combat, politics, return from deployment, illness, military exposures, and moral injury. CONCLUSIONS: Future research should expand on IB in other military experiences, evaluate intervention efficacy and policies, and validate a standardized IB measure. These insights highlight the need for provider education, revised assessments, and interventions tailored to address the complex impact of IB on military and Veteran populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
军人和退伍军人群体中的制度背叛:一项系统的范围审查。
背景:制度背叛(Institutional背叛,简称IB)是指制度对其附属个人的不当行为,包括作为和不作为。由于对军队的强烈社会认同、忠诚和自我牺牲的价值观、对机构的依赖、军事权力结构和法律体系,以及以战争为中心的职业的道德复杂性,军人特别容易受到IB的影响。目的:本综述探讨了军人/退伍军人人群中IB文献的现状,确定了研究差距以及对未来政策和临床护理的影响。方法:对7个数据库进行系统的文献综述,从44篇文献中筛选出16篇符合条件的文献。结果:研究结果表明,在研究人群中,IB经历的患病率很高,与精神症状和临床特征的增加有关。现有文献主要集中在军事性创伤方面,在战斗、政治、从部署返回、疾病、军事暴露和道德伤害的背景下对IB的探索有限。结论:未来的研究应扩展其他军事经验中的IB,评估干预效果和政策,并验证标准化的IB措施。这些见解强调了提供者教育、修订评估和量身定制干预措施的必要性,以解决IB对军人和退伍军人群体的复杂影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association (JAPNA) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal publishing up-to-date information to promote psychiatric nursing, improve mental health care for culturally diverse individuals, families, groups, and communities, as well as shape health care policy for the delivery of mental health services. JAPNA publishes both clinical and research articles relevant to psychiatric nursing. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Improving Medication Adherence in Psychiatric Patients With a Medication Adherence Program. The Relationship Between Trait Mindfulness and Depression Severity Among People With Schizophrenia: The Role of Perceived Public Stigma Toward Mental Illness. Implementation and Evaluation of a High-Fidelity, Interprofessional Simulation Project Using Standardized Patients to Address Aggression in a Psychiatric Emergency Department. Evaluating De-Escalation Training for Direct and Indirect Employees Caring for Residents With Huntington's Disease. Home Health Nurses' Perceptions of Caring for Persons With Severe and Persistent Mental Illnesses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1