Phase II Study of Acalabrutinib, Venetoclax, and Obinutuzumab in a Treatment-Naïve Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Population Enriched for High-Risk Disease.
Matthew S Davids, Christine E Ryan, Benjamin L Lampson, Yue Ren, Svitlana Tyekucheva, Stacey M Fernandes, Jennifer L Crombie, Austin I Kim, Matthew Weinstock, Josie Montegaard, Heather A Walker, Claire Greenman, Victoria Patterson, Caron A Jacobson, Ann S LaCasce, Philippe Armand, David C Fisher, Steve Lo, Adam J Olszewski, Jon E Arnason, Inhye E Ahn, Jennifer R Brown
{"title":"Phase II Study of Acalabrutinib, Venetoclax, and Obinutuzumab in a Treatment-Naïve Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Population Enriched for High-Risk Disease.","authors":"Matthew S Davids, Christine E Ryan, Benjamin L Lampson, Yue Ren, Svitlana Tyekucheva, Stacey M Fernandes, Jennifer L Crombie, Austin I Kim, Matthew Weinstock, Josie Montegaard, Heather A Walker, Claire Greenman, Victoria Patterson, Caron A Jacobson, Ann S LaCasce, Philippe Armand, David C Fisher, Steve Lo, Adam J Olszewski, Jon E Arnason, Inhye E Ahn, Jennifer R Brown","doi":"10.1200/JCO-24-02503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The AMPLIFY trial recently established fixed-duration acalabrutinib, venetoclax, and obinutuzumab (AVO) as a new standard-of-care option for patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with wild-type <i>TP53</i>; however, due to the chemoimmunotherapy control arm, AMPLIFY excluded patients with high-risk <i>TP53</i> aberration, for whom current standards of care are continuous Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy or alternatively fixed-duration venetoclax-based doublets. AVO has not previously been evaluated in patients with CLL with <i>TP53</i> aberration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This investigator-sponsored, multicenter, phase II study enrolled patients with treatment-naïve CLL enriched for high-risk CLL, defined by <i>TP53</i> aberration (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03580928). Patients received acalabrutinib, obinutuzumab, and then venetoclax, with each treatment introduced sequentially and in combination, with the duration guided by measurable residual disease (MRD). Patients who achieved undetectable MRD (uMRD) after either 15 or 24 cycles could discontinue treatment. The primary end point was complete remission (CR) with bone marrow uMRD (BM-uMRD) at the start of cycle 16.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two patients were accrued, including 45 patients with <i>TP53</i> aberration. The CR with BM-uMRD rates at the start of cycle 16 were 42% in patients with <i>TP53</i> aberration and 42% in all-comers, and the BM-uMRD rates were 71% and 78%, respectively. Hematologic toxicities were mainly low grade, and cardiovascular toxicities and bleeding complications were infrequent. After a median follow-up of 55.2 months, 10 patients had progressed, including four with transformation, and three patients died. Four-year progression-free survival and overall survival for patients with or without <i>TP53</i> aberration were 70%/96% and 88%/100%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AVO was highly active and well tolerated in patients with previously untreated high-risk CLL, supporting its use as a new standard-of-care treatment option.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"788-799"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-02503","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The AMPLIFY trial recently established fixed-duration acalabrutinib, venetoclax, and obinutuzumab (AVO) as a new standard-of-care option for patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with wild-type TP53; however, due to the chemoimmunotherapy control arm, AMPLIFY excluded patients with high-risk TP53 aberration, for whom current standards of care are continuous Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy or alternatively fixed-duration venetoclax-based doublets. AVO has not previously been evaluated in patients with CLL with TP53 aberration.
Methods: This investigator-sponsored, multicenter, phase II study enrolled patients with treatment-naïve CLL enriched for high-risk CLL, defined by TP53 aberration (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03580928). Patients received acalabrutinib, obinutuzumab, and then venetoclax, with each treatment introduced sequentially and in combination, with the duration guided by measurable residual disease (MRD). Patients who achieved undetectable MRD (uMRD) after either 15 or 24 cycles could discontinue treatment. The primary end point was complete remission (CR) with bone marrow uMRD (BM-uMRD) at the start of cycle 16.
Results: Seventy-two patients were accrued, including 45 patients with TP53 aberration. The CR with BM-uMRD rates at the start of cycle 16 were 42% in patients with TP53 aberration and 42% in all-comers, and the BM-uMRD rates were 71% and 78%, respectively. Hematologic toxicities were mainly low grade, and cardiovascular toxicities and bleeding complications were infrequent. After a median follow-up of 55.2 months, 10 patients had progressed, including four with transformation, and three patients died. Four-year progression-free survival and overall survival for patients with or without TP53 aberration were 70%/96% and 88%/100%, respectively.
Conclusion: AVO was highly active and well tolerated in patients with previously untreated high-risk CLL, supporting its use as a new standard-of-care treatment option.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.