Prediction based on machine learning of tooth sensitivity for in-office dental bleaching

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105517
Michael Willian Favoreto , Thalita de Paris Matos , Kaliane Rodrigues da Cruz , Aline Xavier Ferraz , Taynara de Souza Carneiro , Alessandra Reis , Alessandro D. Loguercio , Cristiano Miranda de Araujo
{"title":"Prediction based on machine learning of tooth sensitivity for in-office dental bleaching","authors":"Michael Willian Favoreto ,&nbsp;Thalita de Paris Matos ,&nbsp;Kaliane Rodrigues da Cruz ,&nbsp;Aline Xavier Ferraz ,&nbsp;Taynara de Souza Carneiro ,&nbsp;Alessandra Reis ,&nbsp;Alessandro D. Loguercio ,&nbsp;Cristiano Miranda de Araujo","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To develop a supervised machine learning model to predict the occurrence and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS) in patients undergoing in-office dental bleaching testing various algorithm models.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Retrospective data from 458 patients were analyzed, including variables such as the occurrence and intensity of TS, basal tooth color, bleaching material characteristics (concentration and pH), intervention details (number and duration of applications), and patient age. Classification and regression models were evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation and assessed based on various performance parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For the predictive classification task (occurrence of TS), the developed models achieved a maximum area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.76 [0.62–0.88] on the test data, with an F1-score of 0.80 [0.71–0.87]. In cross-validation, the highest AUC reached 0.86 [0.84–0.88], and the highest F1-score was 0.78 [0.75–0.83]. For predicting TS intensity, the regression models demonstrated a minimum mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.76 [1.45–2.06] and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 2.38 [2.06–2.69] on the test set. During cross-validation, the lowest MAE was 1.84 [1.67–2.03], with an RMSE of 2.39 [2.20–2.58].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The supervised machine learning model for estimating the occurrence and intensity of TS in patients undergoing in-office bleaching demonstrated good predictive power. The Gradient Boosting Classifier and Support Vector Machine Regressor algorithms stood out as having the greatest predictive power among those tested.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>These models can serve as valuable tools for anticipating tooth sensitivity in this patient population, facilitating better post-treatment management and control.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 105517"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571224006869","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To develop a supervised machine learning model to predict the occurrence and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS) in patients undergoing in-office dental bleaching testing various algorithm models.

Materials and methods

Retrospective data from 458 patients were analyzed, including variables such as the occurrence and intensity of TS, basal tooth color, bleaching material characteristics (concentration and pH), intervention details (number and duration of applications), and patient age. Classification and regression models were evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation and assessed based on various performance parameters.

Results

For the predictive classification task (occurrence of TS), the developed models achieved a maximum area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.76 [0.62–0.88] on the test data, with an F1-score of 0.80 [0.71–0.87]. In cross-validation, the highest AUC reached 0.86 [0.84–0.88], and the highest F1-score was 0.78 [0.75–0.83]. For predicting TS intensity, the regression models demonstrated a minimum mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.76 [1.45–2.06] and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 2.38 [2.06–2.69] on the test set. During cross-validation, the lowest MAE was 1.84 [1.67–2.03], with an RMSE of 2.39 [2.20–2.58].

Conclusions

The supervised machine learning model for estimating the occurrence and intensity of TS in patients undergoing in-office bleaching demonstrated good predictive power. The Gradient Boosting Classifier and Support Vector Machine Regressor algorithms stood out as having the greatest predictive power among those tested.

Clinical relevance

These models can serve as valuable tools for anticipating tooth sensitivity in this patient population, facilitating better post-treatment management and control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的牙齿敏感性预测在办公室牙齿漂白。
目的:建立一种有监督的机器学习模型,对各种算法模型进行测试,预测门诊牙齿漂白患者牙齿敏感(TS)的发生和强度。材料和方法:回顾性分析458例患者的资料,包括TS的发生和强度、基牙颜色、漂白剂特征(浓度和pH)、干预细节(应用次数和持续时间)、患者年龄等变量。分类和回归模型采用5倍交叉验证进行评估,并根据各种性能参数进行评估。结果:对于预测分类任务(TS的发生),所建立的模型在测试数据上的受试者工作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC)下面积最大为0.76 [0.62-0.88],f1得分为0.80[0.71-0.87]。交叉验证时,最高AUC为0.86[0.84-0.88],最高f1评分为0.78[0.75-0.83]。对于TS强度预测,回归模型在测试集上的最小平均绝对误差(MAE)为1.76[1.45-2.06],均方根误差(RMSE)为2.38[2.06-2.69]。交叉验证时,最低MAE为1.84 [1.67-2.03],RMSE为2.39[2.20-2.58]。结论:有监督的机器学习模型用于估计门诊漂白患者TS的发生率和强度,具有良好的预测能力。在这些测试中,梯度增强分类器和支持向量机回归算法脱颖而出,具有最大的预测能力。临床意义:这些模型可以作为预测该患者群体牙齿敏感性的有价值的工具,促进更好的治疗后管理和控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of dentistry
Journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
349
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis. Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research. The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Synthesis and application of calcium cyclotriphosphate in bleaching formulations: effects on dental enamel properties. Adjunctive use of Hyaluronic Acid in non-surgical periodontal therapy: A Systematic review and Meta-analysis. In situ remineralization of enamel caries lesions with a toothpaste supplemented with fluoride, amorphous calcium phosphate casein phosphopeptide and trimetaphosphate. Effect of surface conditioning on the adhesive bond strength of 3D-printed resins used in permanent fixed dental prostheses. Evaluation of the accuracy (trueness, precision) and processing time of different 3-dimensional CAD software programs and algorithms for virtual cast alignment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1