Wound formation in patients with Rutherford category IV disease after endovascular therapy: rates and risk factors.

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CVIR Endovascular Pub Date : 2024-12-07 DOI:10.1186/s42155-024-00500-3
Toshihiko Kishida, Shinsuke Mori, Kohei Yamaguchi, Masakazu Tsutsumi, Norihiro Kobayashi, Yoshiaki Ito
{"title":"Wound formation in patients with Rutherford category IV disease after endovascular therapy: rates and risk factors.","authors":"Toshihiko Kishida, Shinsuke Mori, Kohei Yamaguchi, Masakazu Tsutsumi, Norihiro Kobayashi, Yoshiaki Ito","doi":"10.1186/s42155-024-00500-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lower limb peripheral artery disease classified as Rutherford category IV, is characterized by lower limb ischemic pain both during exertion and at rest. This disease has an unclear course. We aimed to evaluate outcome predictors in this patient group after endovascular therapy. This single-center, retrospective, observational study included 234 consecutive patients (264 limbs), between April 2007 and December 2020. We investigated the disease clinical course after endovascular therapy. The primary endpoint was the wound formation rate 3 years after endovascular therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean observation period was 48.2 ± 8.9 months. The patients (61.9% male; mean age, 76 ± 10 years) presented with diabetes (64.1%), and received hemodialysis with chronic kidney disease (35.0%) and ambulatory treatment (85.0%). The average ankle-brachial index before endovascular therapy was 0.69 ± 0.23. Skin perfusion pressure on the dorsal and plantar sides was 38 ± 13 mmHg and 36 ± 12 mmHg, respectively. The wound incidence rates at 1, 2, and 3 years after endovascular therapy were 8.3%, 11.4%, and 14.4%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed the following factors associated with wound formation: P2 in inframalleolar/pedal disease category in the Global Limb Anatomical Staging System (hazard ratio: 1.73, 95% confidence interval: 1.22-2.83, P = 0.01), non-ambulatory status (hazard ratio: 1.09, 95% confidence interval: 1.11-1.36, P = 0.02), intervention up to infrapopliteal lesion (hazard ratio: 1.55, 95% confidence interval: 1.17-2.46, P = 0.03), and patient with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis (hazard ratio: 1.61, 95% confidence interval: 1.32-2.18, P = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 3-year incidence of wound onset in this study was 14.4%. Factors associated with this outcome included P2 in the Global Limb Anatomical Staging System, non-ambulatory status, intervention up to infrapopliteal lesion, and patient with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":52351,"journal":{"name":"CVIR Endovascular","volume":"7 1","pages":"86"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11625029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CVIR Endovascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-024-00500-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lower limb peripheral artery disease classified as Rutherford category IV, is characterized by lower limb ischemic pain both during exertion and at rest. This disease has an unclear course. We aimed to evaluate outcome predictors in this patient group after endovascular therapy. This single-center, retrospective, observational study included 234 consecutive patients (264 limbs), between April 2007 and December 2020. We investigated the disease clinical course after endovascular therapy. The primary endpoint was the wound formation rate 3 years after endovascular therapy.

Results: The mean observation period was 48.2 ± 8.9 months. The patients (61.9% male; mean age, 76 ± 10 years) presented with diabetes (64.1%), and received hemodialysis with chronic kidney disease (35.0%) and ambulatory treatment (85.0%). The average ankle-brachial index before endovascular therapy was 0.69 ± 0.23. Skin perfusion pressure on the dorsal and plantar sides was 38 ± 13 mmHg and 36 ± 12 mmHg, respectively. The wound incidence rates at 1, 2, and 3 years after endovascular therapy were 8.3%, 11.4%, and 14.4%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed the following factors associated with wound formation: P2 in inframalleolar/pedal disease category in the Global Limb Anatomical Staging System (hazard ratio: 1.73, 95% confidence interval: 1.22-2.83, P = 0.01), non-ambulatory status (hazard ratio: 1.09, 95% confidence interval: 1.11-1.36, P = 0.02), intervention up to infrapopliteal lesion (hazard ratio: 1.55, 95% confidence interval: 1.17-2.46, P = 0.03), and patient with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis (hazard ratio: 1.61, 95% confidence interval: 1.32-2.18, P = 0.03).

Conclusions: The 3-year incidence of wound onset in this study was 14.4%. Factors associated with this outcome included P2 in the Global Limb Anatomical Staging System, non-ambulatory status, intervention up to infrapopliteal lesion, and patient with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CVIR Endovascular
CVIR Endovascular Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
Direct percutaneous puncture of occluded venous stents as an adjunctive technique to restore patency. A modified technique for radial artery access: how interventional radiologists can optimise the cardiologists' technique to suite their procedures. Intravascular ultrasound-derived virtual fractional flow reserve in the superficial femoral artery. "Bottoms-up" portal venous recanalization TIPS (PVR-TIPS) utilizing a re-entry catheter. Hepatic artery stenting with Viabahn.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1