Quantitative assessment of cervical disc degeneration using disc signal intensity index.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2024.11.017
Koki Tsuchiya, Ichiro Okano, Ali E Guven, Bruno Verna, Paul Köhli, Jan Hambrecht, Gisberto Evangelisti, Erika Chiapparelli, Marco D Burkhard, Vidushi Tripathi, Jennifer Shue, Federico P Girardi, Frank P Cammisa, Andrew A Sama, Alexander P Hughes
{"title":"Quantitative assessment of cervical disc degeneration using disc signal intensity index.","authors":"Koki Tsuchiya, Ichiro Okano, Ali E Guven, Bruno Verna, Paul Köhli, Jan Hambrecht, Gisberto Evangelisti, Erika Chiapparelli, Marco D Burkhard, Vidushi Tripathi, Jennifer Shue, Federico P Girardi, Frank P Cammisa, Andrew A Sama, Alexander P Hughes","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.11.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/context: </strong>The assessment of disc degeneration remains a significant challenge in clinical research. Pfirrmann grade is a frequently used classification for lumbar disc degeneration on MRI. However, there has been no gold standard for cervical spine disc degeneration. Recently, we introduced the Disc Signal Intensity Index (DSI2) as a quantitative disc assessment for the lumbar spine, which is easily measurable in the cervical spine.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to apply DSI2 in the cervical intervertebral disc and investigate the factors associated with the cervical disc degeneration.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Cross-sectional study using retrospectively collected data.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Cervical MRIs from a database of patients undergoing ACDF between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Demographic variables included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), race, smoking status, and comorbidities such as diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and coronary artery disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>DSI2 measurements were performed on midsagittal T2-weighted MRI images by determining the intensity within regions of interest (ROI). One ROI was set in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and three ROIs were set per disc at the anterior, middle, and posterior third. The mean of the three measurements per disc was then divided by that of the CSF to calculate the DSI2 score. Multivariable linear regression analyses with mixed model were conducted to determine the potential contributing factors for disc degeneration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 149 patients and 770 discs were included in the final analysis. Ninety-three patients (37.6%) were female and the mean (SD) age was 55.6 (11.7) years. The distribution of DSI2 scores among the different Pfirrmann grades was as follows: Grade 1: 0.259±NA; Grade 2: 0.226±0.090; Grade 3: 0.175±0.070; Grade 4: 0.136±0.060; Grade 5: 0.131±0.050. Multivariable linear mixed-effect regression analysis, setting with DSI2 as the objective variable, demonstrated that age (β=-0.130, p<.05), BMI (β=-2.06, p<.05), Modic changes (Type1 β= -2.70, p<.01) were independent contributors to disc degeneration. The segments C4/5 and C7/T1 were less prone to disc degeneration (C4/5: β=1.37, p<.001; C7/T1: β=2.63, p<.001) and the history of diabetes (β=5.31, p<.01) was associated with high DSI2.(p<.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study provides valuable insights for identifying risk factors in degenerative cervical conditions utilizing the DSI2. The DSI2 method emerges as a promising alternative for future disc research, excelling in the detection of subtle progressions of degeneration and distinguishing itself from the subjective Pfirrmann grading system.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.11.017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/context: The assessment of disc degeneration remains a significant challenge in clinical research. Pfirrmann grade is a frequently used classification for lumbar disc degeneration on MRI. However, there has been no gold standard for cervical spine disc degeneration. Recently, we introduced the Disc Signal Intensity Index (DSI2) as a quantitative disc assessment for the lumbar spine, which is easily measurable in the cervical spine.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to apply DSI2 in the cervical intervertebral disc and investigate the factors associated with the cervical disc degeneration.

Study design/setting: Cross-sectional study using retrospectively collected data.

Patient sample: Cervical MRIs from a database of patients undergoing ACDF between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed.

Outcome measures: Demographic variables included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), race, smoking status, and comorbidities such as diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and coronary artery disease.

Methods: DSI2 measurements were performed on midsagittal T2-weighted MRI images by determining the intensity within regions of interest (ROI). One ROI was set in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and three ROIs were set per disc at the anterior, middle, and posterior third. The mean of the three measurements per disc was then divided by that of the CSF to calculate the DSI2 score. Multivariable linear regression analyses with mixed model were conducted to determine the potential contributing factors for disc degeneration.

Results: A total of 149 patients and 770 discs were included in the final analysis. Ninety-three patients (37.6%) were female and the mean (SD) age was 55.6 (11.7) years. The distribution of DSI2 scores among the different Pfirrmann grades was as follows: Grade 1: 0.259±NA; Grade 2: 0.226±0.090; Grade 3: 0.175±0.070; Grade 4: 0.136±0.060; Grade 5: 0.131±0.050. Multivariable linear mixed-effect regression analysis, setting with DSI2 as the objective variable, demonstrated that age (β=-0.130, p<.05), BMI (β=-2.06, p<.05), Modic changes (Type1 β= -2.70, p<.01) were independent contributors to disc degeneration. The segments C4/5 and C7/T1 were less prone to disc degeneration (C4/5: β=1.37, p<.001; C7/T1: β=2.63, p<.001) and the history of diabetes (β=5.31, p<.01) was associated with high DSI2.(p<.01).

Conclusions: The present study provides valuable insights for identifying risk factors in degenerative cervical conditions utilizing the DSI2. The DSI2 method emerges as a promising alternative for future disc research, excelling in the detection of subtle progressions of degeneration and distinguishing itself from the subjective Pfirrmann grading system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用椎间盘信号强度指数定量评价颈椎间盘退变。
背景/背景:椎间盘退变的评估仍然是临床研究中的一个重大挑战。Pfirrmann分级是MRI上常用的腰椎间盘退变分级。然而,对于颈椎椎间盘退变并没有金标准。最近,我们引入了椎间盘信号强度指数(DSI2)作为腰椎椎间盘的定量评估,这在颈椎中很容易测量。目的:本研究的目的是将DSI2应用于颈椎间盘,探讨与颈椎间盘退变相关的因素。研究设计/设置:采用回顾性收集的数据进行横断面研究。患者样本:对2015年至2018年ACDF患者数据库中的宫颈mri进行回顾性分析。结果测量:人口统计学变量包括年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、种族、吸烟状况和合并症,如糖尿病、慢性肾病和冠状动脉疾病。方法:通过确定感兴趣区域(ROI)内的强度,对中矢状面t2加权MRI图像进行DSI2测量。在脑脊液(CSF)中设置一个ROI,在每个椎间盘前、中、后三分之一处设置三个ROI。然后将每个椎间盘的三次测量的平均值除以CSF的平均值来计算DSI2评分。采用混合模型进行多变量线性回归分析,以确定椎间盘退变的潜在影响因素。结果:共有149例患者和770个椎间盘纳入最终分析。女性93例(37.6%),平均(SD)年龄为55.6(11.7)岁。DSI2评分在不同Pfirrmann分级中的分布情况如下:1级:0.259±NA;2级:0.226±0.090;3级:0.175±0.070;4级:0.136±0.060;5级:0.131±0.050。以DSI2为客观变量进行多变量线性混合效应回归分析,结果表明:年龄(β= -0.130, p< 0.05)、BMI (β= -2.06, p< 0.05)、Modic变化(type - 1 β= -2.70, p< 0.05)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Biomechanical differences of three cephalic fixation methods for patients with basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation in the setting of congenital atlas occipitalization: a finite element analysis. Patient acceptance of reoperation risk for lumbar decompression versus fusion. A cost-effectiveness analysis of intraosseous basivertebral nerve ablation for the treatment of chronic low back pain. Bodily growth and the intervertebral disc: a longitudinal MRI study in healthy adolescents. Contact between leaked cement and adjacent vertebral endplate induces a greater risk of adjacent vertebral fracture with vertebral bone cement augmentation biomechanically.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1