Long-term outcomes of carotid endarterectomy with eversion technique in patients with an open circle of Willis: A multicenter registry study.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Vascular Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-07 DOI:10.1177/17085381241307750
Anton N Kazantsev, Alexander V Korotkikh, Sergey V Artyukhov, Dmitry V Shmatov, Maxim P Chernyavin, Roman Yu Leader, Elizaveta G Kazantseva, Vyacheslav V Matusevich, Aslan B Zakeryaev, Yury V Belov
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of carotid endarterectomy with eversion technique in patients with an open circle of Willis: A multicenter registry study.","authors":"Anton N Kazantsev, Alexander V Korotkikh, Sergey V Artyukhov, Dmitry V Shmatov, Maxim P Chernyavin, Roman Yu Leader, Elizaveta G Kazantseva, Vyacheslav V Matusevich, Aslan B Zakeryaev, Yury V Belov","doi":"10.1177/17085381241307750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionCarotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a surgery aimed at removing atherosclerotic plaque from the carotid artery. There are classical and eversion CEA techniques. The eversion technique is the most popular because it does not require the use of implants. Eversion CEA is also associated with a lower risk of restenosis in the late postoperative period. During the surgery, the carotid artery is clamped and blood flow to the brain comes from the contralateral carotid artery and vertebral arteries. However, if the circle of Willis (COW) is not closed, compensatory mechanisms for protecting the brain are reduced, which can lead to the development of an intraoperative stroke.PurposeTo analysis of in-hospital and long-term CEA outcomes in patients with different types of closed and non-closed COW.MethodsThis is a multicenter Russian study. In the period from 2010 to 2020. 641 eversion CEA were performed. Depending on the type of structure of the COW, six groups of patients were formed: Type 1 - Closed posterior part (CRS) - in the presence of the posterior communicating (PCOMA) and P1 segment of the posterior cerebral (PCA) arteries; Type 2 - Intermediate type of structure of the posterior part (ISRP) - with hypoplasia of PCOMA or PCA; Type 3 - Open back part (OBP) - in the absence of PCOMA or PCA; Type 4 - Closed anterior part (CFS) - in the presence of the anterior communicating artery (ACOMA) and the A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery (ACA); Type 5 - Intermediate type of anterior part structure (IFPS) - with ACOMA or ACA hypoplasia; Type 6 - Open Front Section (OFS) - in the absence of ACOMA or ACA. The long-term follow-up period was 107.3 ± 14.6 months. The end points of the study were death, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction (MI), ICA thrombosis, hemodynamically significant restenosis of the internal carotid artery, bleeding, and combined endpoint (death + ischemic stroke + TIA + MI).The type of distribution was determined using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov criterion. Group comparisons were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Pearson chi-square tests. Differences were assessed as significant at <i>p</i> < .05. According to clinical and demographic characteristics, the majority of patients were male and elderly. In 20% of cases, patients had a history of MI and/or stroke/TIA. Diabetes mellitus was diagnosed in 10%. There were no significant differences between groups in EuroSCOREII.ResultsIn the long-term postoperative period, the largest number of deaths occurred in groups 5 and 6 (13 (45.1%) and 12 (30.1%)). The majority of strokes were diagnosed in groups 3 (OBP) and 5 (IFPS) (7 (13.5%) and 9 (17.6%)). The highest value of the combined end point (death + stroke/TIA + MI) was obtained in groups 3 (OBP), 5 (IFPS), and 6 (OFS) (23 (44.2%), 26 (50.1%), and 23 (58.9%)).ConclusionThe eversion technique of carotid endarterectomy for carotid artery stenosis is the most preferred. The greatest number of complications of eversion CEA in the hospital and long-term follow-up periods is observed in patients with OBP, IFPS, and OFS. In the presence of an unstable plaque, a temporary shunt can be used, which will exclude the pharmacological increase in blood pressure and the associated risk of embolization.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"1351-1359"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381241307750","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionCarotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a surgery aimed at removing atherosclerotic plaque from the carotid artery. There are classical and eversion CEA techniques. The eversion technique is the most popular because it does not require the use of implants. Eversion CEA is also associated with a lower risk of restenosis in the late postoperative period. During the surgery, the carotid artery is clamped and blood flow to the brain comes from the contralateral carotid artery and vertebral arteries. However, if the circle of Willis (COW) is not closed, compensatory mechanisms for protecting the brain are reduced, which can lead to the development of an intraoperative stroke.PurposeTo analysis of in-hospital and long-term CEA outcomes in patients with different types of closed and non-closed COW.MethodsThis is a multicenter Russian study. In the period from 2010 to 2020. 641 eversion CEA were performed. Depending on the type of structure of the COW, six groups of patients were formed: Type 1 - Closed posterior part (CRS) - in the presence of the posterior communicating (PCOMA) and P1 segment of the posterior cerebral (PCA) arteries; Type 2 - Intermediate type of structure of the posterior part (ISRP) - with hypoplasia of PCOMA or PCA; Type 3 - Open back part (OBP) - in the absence of PCOMA or PCA; Type 4 - Closed anterior part (CFS) - in the presence of the anterior communicating artery (ACOMA) and the A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery (ACA); Type 5 - Intermediate type of anterior part structure (IFPS) - with ACOMA or ACA hypoplasia; Type 6 - Open Front Section (OFS) - in the absence of ACOMA or ACA. The long-term follow-up period was 107.3 ± 14.6 months. The end points of the study were death, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction (MI), ICA thrombosis, hemodynamically significant restenosis of the internal carotid artery, bleeding, and combined endpoint (death + ischemic stroke + TIA + MI).The type of distribution was determined using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov criterion. Group comparisons were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Pearson chi-square tests. Differences were assessed as significant at p < .05. According to clinical and demographic characteristics, the majority of patients were male and elderly. In 20% of cases, patients had a history of MI and/or stroke/TIA. Diabetes mellitus was diagnosed in 10%. There were no significant differences between groups in EuroSCOREII.ResultsIn the long-term postoperative period, the largest number of deaths occurred in groups 5 and 6 (13 (45.1%) and 12 (30.1%)). The majority of strokes were diagnosed in groups 3 (OBP) and 5 (IFPS) (7 (13.5%) and 9 (17.6%)). The highest value of the combined end point (death + stroke/TIA + MI) was obtained in groups 3 (OBP), 5 (IFPS), and 6 (OFS) (23 (44.2%), 26 (50.1%), and 23 (58.9%)).ConclusionThe eversion technique of carotid endarterectomy for carotid artery stenosis is the most preferred. The greatest number of complications of eversion CEA in the hospital and long-term follow-up periods is observed in patients with OBP, IFPS, and OFS. In the presence of an unstable plaque, a temporary shunt can be used, which will exclude the pharmacological increase in blood pressure and the associated risk of embolization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈动脉内膜切除术外翻技术治疗开放性威利斯环患者的长期疗效:一项多中心注册研究。
颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)是一种旨在去除颈动脉粥样硬化斑块的手术。有经典CEA技术和版本CEA技术。外翻技术是最流行的,因为它不需要使用植入物。外翻CEA也与术后后期再狭窄的风险较低相关。在手术过程中,颈动脉被夹住,血液从对侧颈动脉和椎动脉流向脑部。然而,如果威利斯循环(COW)没有关闭,保护大脑的代偿机制就会减少,这可能导致术中卒中的发生。目的:分析不同类型闭合性和非闭合性COW患者的住院和长期CEA预后。方法:这是一项俄罗斯多中心研究。从2010年到2020年。641个版本CEA。根据COW的结构类型,可分为六组患者:1型-后部封闭(CRS) -存在后交通(PCOMA)和大脑后动脉(PCA) P1段;2型-后部中间型结构(ISRP) -伴PCOMA或PCA发育不全;3型-后部开放部分(OBP) -无PCOMA或PCA;4型-前部闭合性(CFS) -存在前交通动脉(ACOMA)和大脑前动脉A1段(ACA);5型-中间型前部结构(IFPS) -伴ACOMA或ACA发育不全;类型6 -开放前节(OFS) -在没有ACOMA或ACA的情况下。长期随访时间为107.3±14.6个月。研究终点为死亡、缺血性卒中、短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)、心肌梗死(MI)、ICA血栓形成、血流动力学显著的颈内动脉再狭窄、出血和联合终点(死亡+缺血性卒中+ TIA + MI)。分布类型采用Kolmogorov-Smirnov准则确定。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Pearson卡方检验进行组间比较。p < 0.05为显著性差异。根据临床和人口学特征,患者以男性和老年人为主。在20%的病例中,患者有心肌梗死和/或卒中/TIA病史。10%的人被诊断为糖尿病。EuroSCOREII组间无显著差异。结果:术后长期死亡人数以第5组和第6组最多,分别为13例(45.1%)和12例(30.1%)。第3组(OBP)和第5组(IFPS)(第7组(13.5%)和第9组(17.6%))诊断为卒中。3组(OBP)、5组(IFPS)和6组(OFS)的合并终点(死亡+卒中/TIA + MI)最高(23(44.2%)、26(50.1%)和23(58.9%))。结论:颈动脉内膜外翻术是治疗颈动脉狭窄的最佳术式。在医院和长期随访期间,外翻CEA的并发症在OBP、IFPS和OFS患者中最多。在存在不稳定斑块的情况下,可以使用临时分流,这将排除血压的药理学升高和相关的栓塞风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular
Vascular 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Knowledge atlas analysis of virtual vascular interventional studies". Retraction Notice to "Two-year follow-up of a n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate glue ablation for the treatment of saphenous vein insufficiency with a novel application catheter with guiding light". Outcomes of drug-coated balloon angioplasty in patients with dyslipidemia in the BIOLUX P-III registry: A subgroup analysis. Comparative outcomes of surgical and conservative management in carotid artery dissection. Comparing anticoagulant therapy alone, anticoagulant therapy in combination with catheter-directed thrombolysis, and anticoagulant therapy in combination with pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis in the patients with optional inferior vena cava filter-related thrombosis: A single-center retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1