Preferences for online or in-person STI testing vary by where a person lives and their cultural background: a survey of young Australians.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Sexually Transmitted Infections Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1136/sextrans-2024-056292
Ethan T Cardwell, Olivia Walsh, Shanton Chang, Jacqueline Coombe, Christopher K Fairley, Jane S Hocking, Fabian Yuh Shiong Kong, Teralynn Ludwick
{"title":"Preferences for online or in-person STI testing vary by where a person lives and their cultural background: a survey of young Australians.","authors":"Ethan T Cardwell, Olivia Walsh, Shanton Chang, Jacqueline Coombe, Christopher K Fairley, Jane S Hocking, Fabian Yuh Shiong Kong, Teralynn Ludwick","doi":"10.1136/sextrans-2024-056292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives are to explore the acceptability of online sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing services among young Australians (16-29 years) and how this may vary between sociodemographic populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, online survey (using both closed and open-ended questions) of Australians aged 16-29 years. Of 905 participants, 781 (86%) responded to the question on preference for online versus in-person STI testing and are included in this analysis. Logistic regression was used to identify sociodemographic factors associated with STI testing preferences (online vs in-person). Adjusted ORs (AOR) are reported for each sociodemographic factor. Content analysis was used to code open-ended responses explaining the reasons for the participant's testing preference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the participants, 75% (588/781) preferred online testing over in-person testing. 677 (87%) provided reasons for their preference in an associated, open-ended question. Multivariable analysis found that the odds of preferring online services were significantly increased for those living in rural compared with metropolitan areas (AOR=1.7, 1.0-2.9). The odds of preferring online testing over in-person testing were significantly decreased for those of Asian descent (AOR=0.4, 0.2-0.6) and for those who reported having previously tested for an STI (0.6, 0.4-0.9). Convenience and privacy were key factors from the content analysis underlining preferences for online testing services but tended to be voiced by participants with certain sociodemographic characteristics (ie, men who have sex with men and older participants). Factors related to trust and convenience underscored preferences related to in-person testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is clear that there is considerable interest among young people in using online STI testing, but it may not be right for all individuals. Understanding what factors associated with online testing are valued by young users can help inform marketing strategies that highlight these value propositions in their messaging. Further research is needed to engage young people and develop a high-quality, usable online service.</p>","PeriodicalId":21624,"journal":{"name":"Sexually Transmitted Infections","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexually Transmitted Infections","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2024-056292","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives are to explore the acceptability of online sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing services among young Australians (16-29 years) and how this may vary between sociodemographic populations.

Methods: A cross-sectional, online survey (using both closed and open-ended questions) of Australians aged 16-29 years. Of 905 participants, 781 (86%) responded to the question on preference for online versus in-person STI testing and are included in this analysis. Logistic regression was used to identify sociodemographic factors associated with STI testing preferences (online vs in-person). Adjusted ORs (AOR) are reported for each sociodemographic factor. Content analysis was used to code open-ended responses explaining the reasons for the participant's testing preference.

Results: Among the participants, 75% (588/781) preferred online testing over in-person testing. 677 (87%) provided reasons for their preference in an associated, open-ended question. Multivariable analysis found that the odds of preferring online services were significantly increased for those living in rural compared with metropolitan areas (AOR=1.7, 1.0-2.9). The odds of preferring online testing over in-person testing were significantly decreased for those of Asian descent (AOR=0.4, 0.2-0.6) and for those who reported having previously tested for an STI (0.6, 0.4-0.9). Convenience and privacy were key factors from the content analysis underlining preferences for online testing services but tended to be voiced by participants with certain sociodemographic characteristics (ie, men who have sex with men and older participants). Factors related to trust and convenience underscored preferences related to in-person testing.

Conclusions: It is clear that there is considerable interest among young people in using online STI testing, but it may not be right for all individuals. Understanding what factors associated with online testing are valued by young users can help inform marketing strategies that highlight these value propositions in their messaging. Further research is needed to engage young people and develop a high-quality, usable online service.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对澳大利亚年轻人的一项调查显示,人们对在线或面对面性传播感染检测的偏好因居住地和文化背景而异。
目的:目的是探讨澳大利亚年轻人(16-29岁)对在线性传播感染(STI)检测服务的接受程度,以及这在不同社会人口中可能存在的差异。方法:对16-29岁的澳大利亚人进行横断面在线调查(使用封闭式和开放式问题)。在905名参与者中,781人(86%)回答了在线与面对面STI检测的偏好问题,并被纳入本分析。使用逻辑回归来确定与STI检测偏好相关的社会人口因素(在线与面对面)。报告每个社会人口因素的调整ORs (AOR)。内容分析用于编码开放式回答,解释参与者测试偏好的原因。结果:在参与者中,75%(588/781)的人更喜欢在线测试而不是面对面测试。677人(87%)在一个相关的开放式问题中提供了他们的偏好原因。多变量分析发现,与大都市地区相比,生活在农村的人更喜欢在线服务的几率显著增加(AOR=1.7, 1.0-2.9)。对于那些亚洲血统的人(AOR=0.4, 0.2-0.6)和那些报告曾经检测过STI的人(0.6,0.4-0.9),倾向于在线检测而不是亲自检测的几率显著降低。便利性和隐私性是内容分析中强调在线测试服务偏好的关键因素,但往往是由具有某些社会人口统计学特征的参与者(即与男性发生性关系的男性和老年参与者)表达的。与信任和便利相关的因素强调了与面对面测试相关的偏好。结论:很明显,年轻人对使用在线性传播感染检测有相当大的兴趣,但这可能并不适合所有人。了解与在线测试相关的哪些因素受到年轻用户的重视,可以帮助制定营销策略,在他们的信息中突出这些价值主张。需要进一步的研究来吸引年轻人并开发高质量、可用的在线服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Sexually Transmitted Infections 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
96
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexually Transmitted Infections is the world’s longest running international journal on sexual health. It aims to keep practitioners, trainees and researchers up to date in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of all STIs and HIV. The journal publishes original research, descriptive epidemiology, evidence-based reviews and comment on the clinical, public health, sociological and laboratory aspects of sexual health from around the world. We also publish educational articles, letters and other material of interest to readers, along with podcasts and other online material. STI provides a high quality editorial service from submission to publication.
期刊最新文献
Trends in syphilis and syphilitic uveitis among South Korean adults in 2010-2019: a nationwide cohort study. Association between HIV risk perception, knowledge of biomedical prevention and sexual behaviour among sub-Saharan African immigrants living in a precarious situation in France. Mycoplasma genitalium treatment outcomes among a cohort failing macrolide resistance-guided treatment across three London sexual health clinics. Efficacy of postexposure prophylaxis with doxycycline (Doxy-PEP) in reducing sexually transmitted infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sexually transmitted infections and migration in Uganda: a population-based study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1