Piloting of a surveillance system for acute respiratory diseases: COVID-19 monitoring using Sick Leave Certificates.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Gesundheitswesen Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1055/a-2497-6449
Inga Overesch, Ulrike Junius-Walker, Johanna Schneider, Mareike Wollenweber, Karina Usipbekova, Wiebke Böhne, Ina Holle, Johannes Dreesman, Elke Mertens, Sveja Eberhard
{"title":"Piloting of a surveillance system for acute respiratory diseases: COVID-19 monitoring using Sick Leave Certificates.","authors":"Inga Overesch, Ulrike Junius-Walker, Johanna Schneider, Mareike Wollenweber, Karina Usipbekova, Wiebke Böhne, Ina Holle, Johannes Dreesman, Elke Mertens, Sveja Eberhard","doi":"10.1055/a-2497-6449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the end of the COVID-19 pandemic and the decreasing significance of official reporting figures, the Lower Saxony State Health Office developed and tested a new indicator: the \"7-day sick leave incidence\". Unlike previous surveillance indicators, it is intended for syndromic surveillance of COVID-19. This article explains the methodological development as well as its benefits, possible applications, and limitations.The indicator is based on the weekly number of sick leaves due to COVID-19 per 100,000 health insurance members entitled to sickness benefits (KGbM) of the AOK Lower Saxony (AOKN). The development of the indicator involved differentiating between initial and follow-up sick leaves, investigating fluctuations in the number of KGbM, analysing the doctors' assignments of ICD Codes U07.1! and U07.2!, and ensuring the timely availability of sick leave data.Initial and follow-up sick leaves were distinguished using a temporal algorithm. In 2022 and 2023, on average, 83.0% (s=5.4%) and 88.9% (s=2.3%) of all initial COVID-19-related sick notes were submitted on time by the end of the respective calendar week. Four out of 5 initial sick notes contained the doctors' ICD code U07.1! (lab-confirmed COVID-19). The number of KGbM proved to be stable (M=1.218.202, s=11.003). When comparing the new \"7-day sick leave incidence\" with the officially used \"7-day incidence rates\" during pandemic, trends were highly similar in 2022 (r=0.89), but diverged significantly in 2023 (r=0.26) due to declining diagnostic activities for the \"7-day incidence rates\".The new 7-day-sick-leave incidence is a good representation of the post-pandemic COVID-19 infection dynamics. The indicator uses routine data and is easy to establish. Limitations relate to possible changes in diagnostic procedures, doctors' coding behaviors and changing demands for sick leave.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":"S365-S372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2497-6449","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the end of the COVID-19 pandemic and the decreasing significance of official reporting figures, the Lower Saxony State Health Office developed and tested a new indicator: the "7-day sick leave incidence". Unlike previous surveillance indicators, it is intended for syndromic surveillance of COVID-19. This article explains the methodological development as well as its benefits, possible applications, and limitations.The indicator is based on the weekly number of sick leaves due to COVID-19 per 100,000 health insurance members entitled to sickness benefits (KGbM) of the AOK Lower Saxony (AOKN). The development of the indicator involved differentiating between initial and follow-up sick leaves, investigating fluctuations in the number of KGbM, analysing the doctors' assignments of ICD Codes U07.1! and U07.2!, and ensuring the timely availability of sick leave data.Initial and follow-up sick leaves were distinguished using a temporal algorithm. In 2022 and 2023, on average, 83.0% (s=5.4%) and 88.9% (s=2.3%) of all initial COVID-19-related sick notes were submitted on time by the end of the respective calendar week. Four out of 5 initial sick notes contained the doctors' ICD code U07.1! (lab-confirmed COVID-19). The number of KGbM proved to be stable (M=1.218.202, s=11.003). When comparing the new "7-day sick leave incidence" with the officially used "7-day incidence rates" during pandemic, trends were highly similar in 2022 (r=0.89), but diverged significantly in 2023 (r=0.26) due to declining diagnostic activities for the "7-day incidence rates".The new 7-day-sick-leave incidence is a good representation of the post-pandemic COVID-19 infection dynamics. The indicator uses routine data and is easy to establish. Limitations relate to possible changes in diagnostic procedures, doctors' coding behaviors and changing demands for sick leave.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
试点监测急性呼吸系统疾病:通过残疾证明监测COVID-19。
随着COVID-19大流行的结束和官方报告数据的重要性下降,下萨克森州卫生局制定并测试了一项新指标:“7天病假发生率”。与以往的监测指标不同,该指标旨在对COVID-19进行综合征监测。本文解释了该方法的发展,以及它的优点、可能的应用和局限性。该指标是根据下萨克森州(AOKN)享有疾病津贴(KGbM)的每10万名健康保险会员每周因COVID-19而请病假的次数计算的。该指标的制定涉及区分初次和后续病假,调查KGbM数量的波动,分析ICD代码U07.1的医生分配!和U07.2 !,并确保及时提供病假数据。使用时间算法区分初始和后续病假。在2022年和2023年,平均有83.0% (s=5.4%)和88.9% (s=2.3%)的患者在各自日历周结束前按时提交了与covid -19相关的所有初次病假。最初的5个病假条中有4个包含医生的ICD代码U07.1!(实验室确诊COVID-19)。KGbM数量稳定(M=1.218.202, s=11.003)。当将新的“7天病假发生率”与大流行期间官方使用的“7天发病率”进行比较时,趋势在2022年非常相似(r=0.89),但在2023年由于“7天发病率”的诊断活动下降而出现显著差异(r=0.26)。新的7天病假发生率很好地反映了COVID-19大流行后的感染动态。该指标采用常规数据,易于建立。限制与诊断程序可能发生的变化、医生编码行为和病假需求的变化有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
期刊最新文献
[Correction: Challenges in Rehabilitation of People with Cognitive and/or Multiple Impairments: Insights from a Pilot Study]. [Correction: Level of knowledge and intention to use digital health services among people with depression: a survey]. [Good cartographic Practice in Health Care, Version 2 - abbreviated version]. [Cross-sector regional care networks to ensure needs-based (inpatient) care in times of crisis - results of focus group discussions with healthcare providers]. [Challenges of digital competence in the public health department: findings from a real-world laboratory].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1