Scoping Review of Women's Experiences of Breastfeeding Associated With Maternity Care in Hospitals That Implement Baby-Friendly Policies.

Keri Durocher, Kimberley T Jackson, Richard Booth, Panagiota Tryphonopoulos, Kelly A Kennedy
{"title":"Scoping Review of Women's Experiences of Breastfeeding Associated With Maternity Care in Hospitals That Implement Baby-Friendly Policies.","authors":"Keri Durocher, Kimberley T Jackson, Richard Booth, Panagiota Tryphonopoulos, Kelly A Kennedy","doi":"10.1016/j.jogn.2024.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore what is currently known about women's breastfeeding experiences associated with maternity care in facilities that implement policies supported by the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We used the scoping review methodology of JBI. We searched the Scopus, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE (Ovid), and PsycINFO databases and gray literature.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>We considered articles published during or after 1991 in English. Inclusion criteria were based on the participant, concept, and context framework and included women who gave birth and initiated breastfeeding during or after maternity care in facilities that were certified through the BFHI, were working toward certification, or were implementing BFHI-aligned policies.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>We extracted the following data from each report: author(s), year/country of publication, study design, research aim, patient population/sample size, clinical setting, BFHI status, and outcomes. We further extracted relevant outcomes by using concepts from the interactive theory of breastfeeding.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>We included 44 reports of studies conducted in 19 countries in the review: 27 quantitative, 9 qualitative, and 8 mixed-methods studies. We mapped the extracted data to 10 concepts from the interactive theory of breastfeeding to classify patient experiences, including dynamic interaction between mother and child; stress; time; woman's and child's biological conditions; woman's and child's perception; woman's decision-making; family and social authority; woman's body image; space; and organizational systems for the protection, promotion, and support of breastfeeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that various interrelated factors in addition to BFHI-specific policies influenced women's experiences. Based on these results, we suggest that awareness of women's personal breastfeeding experiences is crucial to delivering optimal care and developing evidence-based policies. Breastfeeding practice guidelines and policies should be developed to encompass women's experiences to enhance future inpatient breastfeeding support.</p>","PeriodicalId":54903,"journal":{"name":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2024.11.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore what is currently known about women's breastfeeding experiences associated with maternity care in facilities that implement policies supported by the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI).

Data sources: We used the scoping review methodology of JBI. We searched the Scopus, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE (Ovid), and PsycINFO databases and gray literature.

Study selection: We considered articles published during or after 1991 in English. Inclusion criteria were based on the participant, concept, and context framework and included women who gave birth and initiated breastfeeding during or after maternity care in facilities that were certified through the BFHI, were working toward certification, or were implementing BFHI-aligned policies.

Data extraction: We extracted the following data from each report: author(s), year/country of publication, study design, research aim, patient population/sample size, clinical setting, BFHI status, and outcomes. We further extracted relevant outcomes by using concepts from the interactive theory of breastfeeding.

Data synthesis: We included 44 reports of studies conducted in 19 countries in the review: 27 quantitative, 9 qualitative, and 8 mixed-methods studies. We mapped the extracted data to 10 concepts from the interactive theory of breastfeeding to classify patient experiences, including dynamic interaction between mother and child; stress; time; woman's and child's biological conditions; woman's and child's perception; woman's decision-making; family and social authority; woman's body image; space; and organizational systems for the protection, promotion, and support of breastfeeding.

Conclusion: We found that various interrelated factors in addition to BFHI-specific policies influenced women's experiences. Based on these results, we suggest that awareness of women's personal breastfeeding experiences is crucial to delivering optimal care and developing evidence-based policies. Breastfeeding practice guidelines and policies should be developed to encompass women's experiences to enhance future inpatient breastfeeding support.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: JOGNN is a premier resource for health care professionals committed to clinical scholarship that advances the health care of women and newborns. With a focus on nursing practice, JOGNN addresses the latest research, practice issues, policies, opinions, and trends in the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns. This peer-reviewed scientific and technical journal is highly respected for groundbreaking articles on important - and sometimes controversial - issues. Articles published in JOGNN emphasize research evidence and clinical practice, building both science and clinical applications. JOGNN seeks clinical, policy and research manuscripts on the evidence supporting current best practice as well as developing or emerging practice trends. A balance of quantitative and qualitative research with an emphasis on biobehavioral outcome studies and intervention trials is desired. Manuscripts are welcomed on all subjects focused on the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Women in Opioid Recovery Regarding Policies and Laws on Sexual and Reproductive Health. Relationships Among Endorsement of the Superwoman Schema and Health Outcomes. Associations Among Lifetime Discrimination Typologies and Psychological Health in Black and Hispanic Women After Birth. Mental Health Experiences of Muslim American Women During the Perinatal Period. Meta-ethnography of the Experiences of Women of Color Who Survived Severe Maternal Morbidity or Birth Complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1