Real-world safety profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs): Disproportionality analysis of major bleeding events

Lazzaro di Biase MD, Ph.D , Adriano Bonura MD , Pasquale Maria Pecoraro MD , Vincenzo Di Lazzaro MD
{"title":"Real-world safety profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs): Disproportionality analysis of major bleeding events","authors":"Lazzaro di Biase MD, Ph.D ,&nbsp;Adriano Bonura MD ,&nbsp;Pasquale Maria Pecoraro MD ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Di Lazzaro MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) have revolutionized the management of thrombotic conditions, providing more predictable and manageable anticoagulation compared to traditional vitamin K antagonists. Despite their success, major bleeding events remain a significant concern. This study aims to assess and compare the haemorrhagic risks associated with various DOACs using data from the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database was conducted, covering the period from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2023. The study focused on adverse bleeding events reported for DOACs. The Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) was calculated for each DOAC to identify disproportionate reporting of haemorrhagic events. Major haemorrhagic events were classified as those leading to hospitalization. The analysis also utilized the Medicare Part D dataset to estimate the usage of specific DOACs from 2015 to 2021.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 353,188 haemorrhagic events were identified, with 17,236 (4.9%) attributed to DOACs. The PRR for major haemorrhagic events was highest for Edoxaban at 14.1 (95% CI 13.93-14.85), followed by Dabigatran at 4.0 (95% CI 3.81-4.20), Apixaban at 3.53 (95% CI 3.47-3.61), and Rivaroxaban at 2.11 (95% CI 2.05-2.18). Edoxaban also had the highest PRR for cerebral haemorrhages. Medicare data indicated that Apixaban was the most commonly used DOAC (58.3%), followed by Rivaroxaban (34.5%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Edoxaban shows a significantly higher risk of major and cerebral haemorrhages compared to other DOACs, while Rivaroxaban demonstrates a lower overall risk of haemorrhage. These findings emphasize the need for careful consideration of bleeding risks in DOAC therapy. Continuous post-marketing surveillance is crucial for understanding the safety profiles of DOACs in real-world clinical settings, aiding clinicians and patients in making informed decisions about anticoagulant therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":"34 2","pages":"Article 108173"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305724006165","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) have revolutionized the management of thrombotic conditions, providing more predictable and manageable anticoagulation compared to traditional vitamin K antagonists. Despite their success, major bleeding events remain a significant concern. This study aims to assess and compare the haemorrhagic risks associated with various DOACs using data from the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods

A retrospective disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database was conducted, covering the period from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2023. The study focused on adverse bleeding events reported for DOACs. The Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) was calculated for each DOAC to identify disproportionate reporting of haemorrhagic events. Major haemorrhagic events were classified as those leading to hospitalization. The analysis also utilized the Medicare Part D dataset to estimate the usage of specific DOACs from 2015 to 2021.

Results

A total of 353,188 haemorrhagic events were identified, with 17,236 (4.9%) attributed to DOACs. The PRR for major haemorrhagic events was highest for Edoxaban at 14.1 (95% CI 13.93-14.85), followed by Dabigatran at 4.0 (95% CI 3.81-4.20), Apixaban at 3.53 (95% CI 3.47-3.61), and Rivaroxaban at 2.11 (95% CI 2.05-2.18). Edoxaban also had the highest PRR for cerebral haemorrhages. Medicare data indicated that Apixaban was the most commonly used DOAC (58.3%), followed by Rivaroxaban (34.5%).

Conclusions

Edoxaban shows a significantly higher risk of major and cerebral haemorrhages compared to other DOACs, while Rivaroxaban demonstrates a lower overall risk of haemorrhage. These findings emphasize the need for careful consideration of bleeding risks in DOAC therapy. Continuous post-marketing surveillance is crucial for understanding the safety profiles of DOACs in real-world clinical settings, aiding clinicians and patients in making informed decisions about anticoagulant therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)的实际安全性:主要出血事件的歧化分析。
背景:与传统的维生素K拮抗剂相比,直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)已经彻底改变了血栓形成条件的管理,提供了更可预测和可管理的抗凝。尽管取得了成功,但重大出血事件仍然令人担忧。本研究旨在利用FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的数据,评估和比较与各种doac相关的出血风险。方法:对FAERS数据库2015年1月1日至2023年12月31日的数据进行回顾性歧化分析。该研究的重点是DOACs报告的不良出血事件。计算每个DOAC的比例报告比(PRR),以确定不成比例的出血事件报告。大出血事件被归类为导致住院的事件。该分析还利用医疗保险D部分数据集来估计2015年至2021年特定doac的使用情况。结果:共发现353188例出血事件,其中17236例(4.9%)归因于doac。主要出血事件的PRR最高的是依多沙班,为14.1 (95% CI 13.93-14.85),其次是达比加群4.0 (95% CI 3.81-4.20),阿哌沙班3.53 (95% CI 3.47-3.61),利伐沙班2.11 (95% CI 2.05-2.18)。依多沙班治疗脑出血的PRR也最高。医疗数据显示,阿哌沙班是最常用的DOAC(58.3%),其次是利伐沙班(34.5%)。结论:与其他doac相比,依多沙班显示出明显更高的大出血和脑出血风险,而利伐沙班显示出较低的总体出血风险。这些发现强调在DOAC治疗中需要仔细考虑出血风险。持续的上市后监测对于了解doac在实际临床环境中的安全性至关重要,有助于临床医生和患者对抗凝治疗做出明智的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
583
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases publishes original papers on basic and clinical science related to the fields of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. The Journal also features review articles, controversies, methods and technical notes, selected case reports and other original articles of special nature. Its editorial mission is to focus on prevention and repair of cerebrovascular disease. Clinical papers emphasize medical and surgical aspects of stroke, clinical trials and design, epidemiology, stroke care delivery systems and outcomes, imaging sciences and rehabilitation of stroke. The Journal will be of special interest to specialists involved in caring for patients with cerebrovascular disease, including neurologists, neurosurgeons and cardiologists.
期刊最新文献
Direct oral anticoagulants compared to aspirin for embolic stroke of undetermined source: A comprehensive meta-analysis Evaluating the Strengths and Limitations of Structured Modified Rankin Scale Validation Studies - A Systematic Review. Female Sex is associated with reduced thrombolytic administration in an Australian Stroke Cohort: A multicentre retrospective cohort study Joint association of physical activity and night sleep duration with the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease Quality indicators of stroke care in Colombia based on the RES-Q registry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1