Long-term oncological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open gastrectomy for cancer

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116134
Francesco Abboretti , Laura Didisheim , Hugo Teixeira Farinha , Markus Schäfer , Styliani Mantziari
{"title":"Long-term oncological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open gastrectomy for cancer","authors":"Francesco Abboretti ,&nbsp;Laura Didisheim ,&nbsp;Hugo Teixeira Farinha ,&nbsp;Markus Schäfer ,&nbsp;Styliani Mantziari","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although laparoscopy is widely used in oncologic digestive surgery, many centers are still reluctant to replace open surgery for gastric cancer treatment, especially in advanced disease. The aim of this study was to assess long-term survival and recurrence in patients after laparoscopic (LG) versus open (OG) oncological gastrectomy, in a tertiary reference center.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All consecutive patients with gastric adenocarcinoma undergoing curative gastrectomy between December 2007 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinico-pathological characteristics, survival and recurrence were compared among LG, OG or converted (CoG) patients. The ×2 test was used for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test for continuous ones. Survival was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test, as well as a multivariable Cox regression analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 156 included patients, 49 (31.4 ​%) were in the LG group, 93 (59.6 ​%) in the OG group, and 14 (9 ​%) in the CoG group. Baseline demographics were similar among the groups. R0 resection rates were 75.5 ​% in LG, 80.6 ​% in OG, and 64.3 ​% in CoG (p ​= ​0.489). Open surgery was associated with a higher mean lymph node yield (28.4 ​± ​11.6) compared to LG (22.8 ​± ​9.7) and CoG (26.5 ​± ​12.3, p ​= ​0.036). Severe postoperative complications were higher in the CoG group (64.3 ​% CoG versus 29 ​% OG, 32.7 ​% LG, p ​= ​0.035). The CoG group had a significantly inferior disease-free survival (p ​= ​0.012 vs OG, p ​= ​0.003 vs LG; 53.3 ​% OG, 62.7 ​% LG and 28.1 ​% CoG) although overall survival was similar (57.1 ​% OG, 62.7 ​% LG and 32.7 ​% CoG, all p ​&gt; ​0.005).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Laparoscopic gastrectomy, while associated with a lower lymph node yield, provides similar overall survival rates compared to open surgery. Conversion to open surgery was associated with higher major postoperative morbidity and inferior disease-free survival.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 116134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000296102400686X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Although laparoscopy is widely used in oncologic digestive surgery, many centers are still reluctant to replace open surgery for gastric cancer treatment, especially in advanced disease. The aim of this study was to assess long-term survival and recurrence in patients after laparoscopic (LG) versus open (OG) oncological gastrectomy, in a tertiary reference center.

Methods

All consecutive patients with gastric adenocarcinoma undergoing curative gastrectomy between December 2007 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinico-pathological characteristics, survival and recurrence were compared among LG, OG or converted (CoG) patients. The ×2 test was used for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous ones. Survival was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test, as well as a multivariable Cox regression analysis.

Results

Among 156 included patients, 49 (31.4 ​%) were in the LG group, 93 (59.6 ​%) in the OG group, and 14 (9 ​%) in the CoG group. Baseline demographics were similar among the groups. R0 resection rates were 75.5 ​% in LG, 80.6 ​% in OG, and 64.3 ​% in CoG (p ​= ​0.489). Open surgery was associated with a higher mean lymph node yield (28.4 ​± ​11.6) compared to LG (22.8 ​± ​9.7) and CoG (26.5 ​± ​12.3, p ​= ​0.036). Severe postoperative complications were higher in the CoG group (64.3 ​% CoG versus 29 ​% OG, 32.7 ​% LG, p ​= ​0.035). The CoG group had a significantly inferior disease-free survival (p ​= ​0.012 vs OG, p ​= ​0.003 vs LG; 53.3 ​% OG, 62.7 ​% LG and 28.1 ​% CoG) although overall survival was similar (57.1 ​% OG, 62.7 ​% LG and 32.7 ​% CoG, all p ​> ​0.005).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic gastrectomy, while associated with a lower lymph node yield, provides similar overall survival rates compared to open surgery. Conversion to open surgery was associated with higher major postoperative morbidity and inferior disease-free survival.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微创与开放式胃切除术治疗癌症的长期肿瘤预后。
背景:虽然腹腔镜在肿瘤消化外科手术中应用广泛,但许多中心仍不愿意取代开放手术治疗胃癌,特别是在晚期疾病中。本研究的目的是在三级参考中心评估腹腔镜(LG)与开放式(OG)肿瘤胃切除术后患者的长期生存率和复发率。方法:回顾性分析2007年12月至2021年12月连续行根治性胃切除术的所有胃腺癌患者。比较LG、OG和转归(CoG)患者的临床病理特征、生存率和复发率。分类变量采用×2检验,连续变量采用Mann-Whitney U检验。生存率评估采用Kaplan-Meier法和log-rank检验,以及多变量Cox回归分析。结果:156例患者中,LG组49例(31.4%),OG组93例(59.6%),CoG组14例(9%)。各组的基线人口统计数据相似。R0切除率LG为75.5%,OG为80.6%,CoG为64.3% (p = 0.489)。开放手术的平均淋巴结清扫率(28.4±11.6)高于LG(22.8±9.7)和CoG(26.5±12.3,p = 0.036)。CoG组术后严重并发症发生率较高(CoG组64.3%,OG组29%,LG组32.7%,p = 0.035)。CoG组无病生存期明显低于OG组(p = 0.012, p = 0.003);53.3% OG, 62.7% LG和28.1% CoG),尽管总生存率相似(57.1% OG, 62.7% LG和32.7% CoG,均p < 0.05)。结论:腹腔镜胃切除术,虽然与较低的淋巴结率相关,但与开放手术相比,提供了相似的总生存率。转为开放手术与较高的术后主要发病率和较差的无病生存率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Trends in use of outpatient minimally-invasive adrenalectomy: A population-based analysis Colorectal cancer care equity in underserved communities: Innovative solutions for screening, outreach & capacity in rural Washington “Sucking the trouble” out of troubleshooting wound vacs: Video based curriculum development and implementation in a live tissue model Continuous intraoperative AI monitoring of surgical technical skills using computer vision. Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1