Developing a toolkit to support parents' involvement in child death review: an experience-based co-design study.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Archives of Disease in Childhood Pub Date : 2024-12-08 DOI:10.1136/archdischild-2024-327642
Joanna Jane Garstang, Jenna Spry, Gayle Routledge, Anna Pease, Karen L Shaw, Sara Kenyon
{"title":"Developing a toolkit to support parents' involvement in child death review: an experience-based co-design study.","authors":"Joanna Jane Garstang, Jenna Spry, Gayle Routledge, Anna Pease, Karen L Shaw, Sara Kenyon","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding why children die is important for grieving parents and for informing system improvements aimed at prevention and future care. Many countries have child death review (CDR) process, but little is known about how best to engage parents. The aim of this study was to use experience-based co-design to create a toolkit to support parental involvement in CDR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey of English paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and palliative care services explored practices and identified a diverse sample of sites for professional interviews. Bereaved parents were recruited through charities, hospitals and social media. Semistructured interviews were held with parents and professionals followed by co-design workshops to develop the toolkit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 29 survey responses, 13 out of 21 from PICUs and 16 out of 34 from palliative care.21 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals were interviewed.23 bereaved parents of children who died aged 0-18 years in 2021-2022, either during hospital admission or under palliative care were, interviewed.10 parents and 23 professionals participated in co-design meetings. Key emotional touchpoints identified from parents' experiences were: becoming aware of CDR meetings, being asked for input, knowing the date and receiving feedback. All agreed on the importance of involving parents, with clear communication, and need for resources and training for key workers.The toolkit includes training videos, a standardised pathway including template letters, feedback form, easy-read leaflet and an animation explaining the importance of involving parents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Co-design has successfully supported the development of a toolkit of resources in a sensitive area. It required considerable support from bereavement support organisations and researchers. Future evaluation is required.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ISRCTN14790455.</p>","PeriodicalId":8150,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327642","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding why children die is important for grieving parents and for informing system improvements aimed at prevention and future care. Many countries have child death review (CDR) process, but little is known about how best to engage parents. The aim of this study was to use experience-based co-design to create a toolkit to support parental involvement in CDR.

Methods: A survey of English paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and palliative care services explored practices and identified a diverse sample of sites for professional interviews. Bereaved parents were recruited through charities, hospitals and social media. Semistructured interviews were held with parents and professionals followed by co-design workshops to develop the toolkit.

Results: There were 29 survey responses, 13 out of 21 from PICUs and 16 out of 34 from palliative care.21 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals were interviewed.23 bereaved parents of children who died aged 0-18 years in 2021-2022, either during hospital admission or under palliative care were, interviewed.10 parents and 23 professionals participated in co-design meetings. Key emotional touchpoints identified from parents' experiences were: becoming aware of CDR meetings, being asked for input, knowing the date and receiving feedback. All agreed on the importance of involving parents, with clear communication, and need for resources and training for key workers.The toolkit includes training videos, a standardised pathway including template letters, feedback form, easy-read leaflet and an animation explaining the importance of involving parents.

Conclusions: Co-design has successfully supported the development of a toolkit of resources in a sensitive area. It required considerable support from bereavement support organisations and researchers. Future evaluation is required.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN14790455.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发工具包以支持父母参与儿童死亡审查:一项基于经验的共同设计研究。
背景:了解儿童死亡的原因对于悲伤的父母和告知旨在预防和未来护理的系统改进是重要的。许多国家都有儿童死亡审查(CDR)程序,但对如何最好地让父母参与了解甚少。本研究的目的是使用基于经验的共同设计来创建一个工具包,以支持家长参与CDR。方法:对英国儿科重症监护病房(picu)和姑息治疗服务进行调查,探索实践,并确定了不同的专业访谈地点样本。丧亲父母是通过慈善机构、医院和社交媒体招募的。与家长和专业人士进行了半结构化的访谈,随后举行了共同设计研讨会,以开发工具包。结果:共有29份调查回复,21份来自picu的13份,34份来自姑息治疗的16份。采访了21名多学科卫生保健专业人员。对23名在2021-2022年期间在住院期间或姑息治疗期间死亡的0-18岁儿童的父母进行了访谈。10名家长和23名专业人士参加了共同设计会议。从父母的经历中确定的关键情感接触点是:意识到CDR会议,被要求提供意见,知道日期和收到反馈。所有人都同意家长参与的重要性,明确的沟通,以及对关键工作人员的资源和培训的必要性。该工具包包括培训视频、标准化途径(包括模板信件、反馈表格、易于阅读的传单和解释家长参与重要性的动画)。结论:共同设计成功地支持了敏感地区资源工具包的开发。它需要丧亲支持组织和研究人员的大力支持。需要进一步的评价。试验注册号:ISRCTN14790455。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
291
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.
期刊最新文献
Five-year evaluation of a model to deliver scheduled outpatient care. Sure Start revisited. Acute attacks of respiratory distress: moving from description to a personalised approach. Rollout of Martha's Rule: implications for care. Changes to the UK childhood immunisation schedule.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1