Bleeding, stroke, and mortality risk of patients with septic shock receiving anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation.

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart rhythm Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.12.001
Sahitya Allam, Jonathan Na, Joanne Moon, Yash Desai, Christopher Messner, Robert Potenza, Mark Sonbol, Faisal Abushullaih, Abdullah Aljudaibi, Maria Abraham, Kevin Chen, Ethan Kotloff, Simin Hossain, Elnaz Esmati, Thomas Kutner, Gregory Norcross, James Childress, Paul Han, Ian Welch, Michael Sokolow, Vincent See, Libin Wang
{"title":"Bleeding, stroke, and mortality risk of patients with septic shock receiving anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation.","authors":"Sahitya Allam, Jonathan Na, Joanne Moon, Yash Desai, Christopher Messner, Robert Potenza, Mark Sonbol, Faisal Abushullaih, Abdullah Aljudaibi, Maria Abraham, Kevin Chen, Ethan Kotloff, Simin Hossain, Elnaz Esmati, Thomas Kutner, Gregory Norcross, James Childress, Paul Han, Ian Welch, Michael Sokolow, Vincent See, Libin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are limited data on the effects of therapeutic anticoagulation (AC) on stroke and bleeding risk in patients with sepsis-induced atrial fibrillation (AF).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the effect of therapeutic AC on the development of inpatient strokes and significant bleeding in hospitalized patients with septic shock and AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective study examined 604 patients with septic shock and AF. The total AF population was further subdivided into new-onset AF. Propensity score matching was used to match patients with similar comorbidities who received and did not receive AC. The risks of bleeding, in-hospital stroke, increased length of stay, and mortality were compared between propensity score-matched cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2 and 3a bleeding events were the most common. After propensity score matching, the relative risk of bleeding on AC was not significantly higher in either group (AF, 1.33 [95% confidence interval, 0.81-2.17]; new-onset AF, 1.60 [95% confidence interval, 0.72-3.54]). AC also did not decrease the number of ischemic strokes (AF, 1.34% with AC vs 1.34% without AC [P = 1]; new-onset AF, 0.89% with AC vs 1.79% without AC [P = .56]). There was significantly reduced mortality of patients who received AC (AF, 52.35% with AC vs 66.44% without AC [P = .01]; new-onset AF, 46.43% with AC vs 66.07% without AC [P = .04]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with septic shock and AF, AC was not associated with a higher incidence of bleeding or lowering of in-hospital strokes but was associated with decreased mortality, potentially protecting against disseminated intravascular coagulopathy or other embolic phenomena.</p>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.12.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are limited data on the effects of therapeutic anticoagulation (AC) on stroke and bleeding risk in patients with sepsis-induced atrial fibrillation (AF).

Objective: This study aimed to determine the effect of therapeutic AC on the development of inpatient strokes and significant bleeding in hospitalized patients with septic shock and AF.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective study examined 604 patients with septic shock and AF. The total AF population was further subdivided into new-onset AF. Propensity score matching was used to match patients with similar comorbidities who received and did not receive AC. The risks of bleeding, in-hospital stroke, increased length of stay, and mortality were compared between propensity score-matched cohorts.

Results: Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2 and 3a bleeding events were the most common. After propensity score matching, the relative risk of bleeding on AC was not significantly higher in either group (AF, 1.33 [95% confidence interval, 0.81-2.17]; new-onset AF, 1.60 [95% confidence interval, 0.72-3.54]). AC also did not decrease the number of ischemic strokes (AF, 1.34% with AC vs 1.34% without AC [P = 1]; new-onset AF, 0.89% with AC vs 1.79% without AC [P = .56]). There was significantly reduced mortality of patients who received AC (AF, 52.35% with AC vs 66.44% without AC [P = .01]; new-onset AF, 46.43% with AC vs 66.07% without AC [P = .04]).

Conclusion: In patients with septic shock and AF, AC was not associated with a higher incidence of bleeding or lowering of in-hospital strokes but was associated with decreased mortality, potentially protecting against disseminated intravascular coagulopathy or other embolic phenomena.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:治疗性抗凝对脓毒症诱发房颤患者中风和出血风险的影响数据有限:有关治疗性抗凝对脓毒症诱发房颤患者中风和出血风险影响的数据有限:目的:确定治疗性抗凝对脓毒症休克合并房颤住院患者发生住院脑卒中和严重出血的影响:这项单中心回顾性研究对 604 名脓毒性休克合并房颤患者进行了检查。心房颤动患者总数又进一步细分为新发心房颤动患者。采用倾向评分匹配法(PSM)对合并症相似、接受和未接受房颤治疗的患者进行配对。比较了倾向匹配队列之间的出血、院内中风、住院时间延长和死亡率风险:结果:BARC 2 和 3a 级出血事件最为常见。在 PSM 后,两组患者使用 AC 时出血的相对风险均无明显增加(房颤:1.33,95% CI,0.81-2.17;新发房颤:1.60,95% CI,0.72-3.54)。房颤治疗也没有减少缺血性脑卒中的发生(房颤:有房颤治疗者为 1.34%,无房颤治疗者为 1.34%,P = 1.00;新发房颤:有房颤治疗者为 0.89%,无房颤治疗者为 1.79%,P = 0.56)。接受心房颤动治疗的患者死亡率明显降低(心房颤动:接受心房颤动治疗的患者为52.35%,未接受心房颤动治疗的患者为66.44%,P = 0.01;新发心房颤动:接受心房颤动治疗的患者为46.43%,未接受心房颤动治疗的患者为66.07%,P = 0.04):在脓毒性休克和房颤患者中,使用 AC 与出血发生率升高或院内中风发生率降低无关,但与死亡率降低有关,可能对 DIC 或其他栓塞现象起到保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart rhythm
Heart rhythm 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.50%
发文量
1465
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability. HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community. The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.
期刊最新文献
Risk factors of late arrhythmia recurrences over 12 months after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: Insight into atrial cardiomyopathy. A Novel Focal Lattice Tip Catheter Toggling Between Pulsed Field Energy and Radiofrequency for Atrial Arrhythmia Ablation: Results from a Real-World, Multicenter Registry. Pentaspline catheter or cryoballoon for pulmonary vein plus posterior wall isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation: 1-year outcomes. Prospective Validation of a Pre-Specified Algorithm for the Management of Conduction Disturbances Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. The PROMOTE Study. Prediction of Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias using Multiple Cardiovascular Risk Factor Polygenic Risk Scores.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1