Ig-M and Ig-A Enriched Ig-G Infusion as Adjuvant Therapy in the Critically ill Patients Experiencing SARS-CoV-2 Severe Infection.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Intensive Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-08 DOI:10.1177/08850666241301689
Alberto Corona, Sara Simoncini, Giuseppe Richini, Ivan Gatti, Clemente Santorsola, Andrea Patroni, Giacomina Tomasini, Alice Capone, Elena Zendra, Myriam Shuman
{"title":"Ig-M and Ig-A Enriched Ig-G Infusion as Adjuvant Therapy in the Critically ill Patients Experiencing SARS-CoV-2 Severe Infection.","authors":"Alberto Corona, Sara Simoncini, Giuseppe Richini, Ivan Gatti, Clemente Santorsola, Andrea Patroni, Giacomina Tomasini, Alice Capone, Elena Zendra, Myriam Shuman","doi":"10.1177/08850666241301689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>SARS-CoV-2 in patients who need Intensive Care (ICU) is associated with a mortality rate ranging from 10 to 40%-45%, with an increase in morbidity and mortality in presence of sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assumed that immunoglobulin (Ig) M and IgA enriched IgG (IGAM) therapy may support SARS COV-2 sepsis-related phase improving patient outcome. We conducted a retrospective case-control study on all the patients admitted to our ICU during the three pandemic waves between February 2020 and April 2021. Upon ICU admission, patients received anticoagulants with the standard supportive treatment (ST) ± IGAM therapy. After matching for the baseline characteristics and treatments, the patients receiving IGAM therapy too (group A), were compared with those undergoing ST (group B) only.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>85 patients were enrolled in group A, whereas 111 in group B. The mortality resulted lower in group A [37.6% versus 55.8%, OR: 0.7 (02-08), <i>P</i> = .01)]. A logistic regression analysis identified IGAM treatment as a survival predictor [OR: 0.35 (95%CI, 0.2-0.8)], whereas experiencing a super-infection [OR: 1.88 (95%CI, 1.5-4.9)] and a septic shock [OR: 1.92 (95%CI, 1.4-4.3)] as predictors of death. On day 7, the probability of dying was 3 times higher in patients treated with ST only. Variable life adjustment display (VLAD) was equal to 2.4 in group A, while - 2.2 group B (in terms of lives saved in relation with those expected, in according with Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The treatment based on IGAM infusion seems to give an advantage chance of survival in SARS-CoV-2 severe infection. Further prospective studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666241301689"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241301689","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 in patients who need Intensive Care (ICU) is associated with a mortality rate ranging from 10 to 40%-45%, with an increase in morbidity and mortality in presence of sepsis.

Methods: We assumed that immunoglobulin (Ig) M and IgA enriched IgG (IGAM) therapy may support SARS COV-2 sepsis-related phase improving patient outcome. We conducted a retrospective case-control study on all the patients admitted to our ICU during the three pandemic waves between February 2020 and April 2021. Upon ICU admission, patients received anticoagulants with the standard supportive treatment (ST) ± IGAM therapy. After matching for the baseline characteristics and treatments, the patients receiving IGAM therapy too (group A), were compared with those undergoing ST (group B) only.

Results: 85 patients were enrolled in group A, whereas 111 in group B. The mortality resulted lower in group A [37.6% versus 55.8%, OR: 0.7 (02-08), P = .01)]. A logistic regression analysis identified IGAM treatment as a survival predictor [OR: 0.35 (95%CI, 0.2-0.8)], whereas experiencing a super-infection [OR: 1.88 (95%CI, 1.5-4.9)] and a septic shock [OR: 1.92 (95%CI, 1.4-4.3)] as predictors of death. On day 7, the probability of dying was 3 times higher in patients treated with ST only. Variable life adjustment display (VLAD) was equal to 2.4 in group A, while - 2.2 group B (in terms of lives saved in relation with those expected, in according with Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) score.

Conclusion: The treatment based on IGAM infusion seems to give an advantage chance of survival in SARS-CoV-2 severe infection. Further prospective studies are warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ig-M和Ig-A富集Ig-G输注对SARS-CoV-2重症感染危重患者的辅助治疗
在需要重症监护(ICU)的患者中,SARS-CoV-2与死亡率相关,死亡率在10%至40%-45%之间,存在败血症时发病率和死亡率会增加。方法:我们假设免疫球蛋白(Ig) M和IgA富集IgG (IGAM)治疗可能支持SARS COV-2败血症相关阶段改善患者预后。我们对2020年2月至2021年4月三次大流行期间ICU收治的所有患者进行了回顾性病例对照研究。在ICU入院时,患者接受抗凝治疗和标准支持治疗(ST)±IGAM治疗。在基线特征和治疗方法匹配后,将同时接受IGAM治疗的患者(A组)与仅接受ST治疗的患者(B组)进行比较。结果:A组85例,b组111例,死亡率低于A组[37.6%比55.8%,OR: 0.7 (02-08), P = 0.01)]。logistic回归分析确定IGAM治疗是生存预测因子[OR: 0.35 (95%CI, 0.2-0.8)],而经历超感染[OR: 1.88 (95%CI, 1.5-4.9)]和脓毒性休克[OR: 1.92 (95%CI, 1.4-4.3)]是死亡预测因子。在第7天,仅接受ST治疗的患者死亡概率高出3倍。可变寿命调节显示(VLAD)在A组为2.4,而在B组为- 2.2(根据简化急性生理评分II (SAPS II)评分,与预期的生命相关)。结论:以IGAM输注治疗SARS-CoV-2重症感染患者生存率较高。进一步的前瞻性研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Sepsis Onset Timing on All-Cause Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Serial Lactate in Clinical Medicine - A Narrative Review. A Combined Model of Vital Signs and Serum Biomarkers Outperforms Shock Index in the Prediction of Hemorrhage Control Interventions in Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients. The Effects of Inspiratory Muscle Training in Critically ill Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Anticoagulation Monitoring Strategies During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Therapy - Differences Between Simultaneously Obtained Coagulation Tests: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1