Palliative Care Outcomes for Critically ill Children After Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Intensive Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-08 DOI:10.1177/08850666241304320
Katherine Perofsky, Ami Doshi, Zaineb Boulil, Julia Beauchamp Walters, Euyhyun Lee, David Dimmock, Stephen Kingsmore, Nicole G Coufal
{"title":"Palliative Care Outcomes for Critically ill Children After Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing.","authors":"Katherine Perofsky, Ami Doshi, Zaineb Boulil, Julia Beauchamp Walters, Euyhyun Lee, David Dimmock, Stephen Kingsmore, Nicole G Coufal","doi":"10.1177/08850666241304320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Clinical utility of rapid whole genome sequencing (rWGS) has been reported in 30-70% of pediatric ICU patients who receive a molecular diagnosis. Rapid molecular diagnostic techniques have been increasingly integrated into critical care, yet the influence of genetic test results on palliative care related decision making is largely unknown. This study evaluates palliative care related outcomes after rWGS.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary children's hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Acutely ill children <math><mo>≤</mo></math> 18 years of age who received rWGS due to suspected genetic disease between July 2016 and November 2019.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>rWGS with associated precision medicine.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>536 patients underwent rWGS, of whom 152 (28.4%) received a molecular diagnosis. Diagnostic rWGS was associated with more code status modifications, an increase in palliative care inpatient consultations, and greater enrollment in home-based palliative services. A comparison of diagnostic and nondiagnostic rWGS groups where palliative decisions were made prior to reporting of genomic testing results did not identify differences between the groups. In the subset of patients who had palliative care interventions (<i>n </i>= 57, 53% with diagnostic rWGS), time to palliative care consultation and time to compassionate extubation were shorter for patients with rWGS-based diagnoses (Kaplan-Meier method, <i>P </i>= .008; <i>P </i>= .015). Significantly more patients in this subgroup with diagnostic rWGS received home-based palliative care (Chi-squared, <i>P = </i>.025, 95% CI [-0.47, -0.05]). Univariate Poisson regression indicated that diagnostic rWGS is associated with significantly fewer emergency visits, PICU admissions, and unplanned intubations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diagnostic rWGS correlates with more rapid engagement of pediatric palliative care services, higher enrollment rates in home-based palliative care, and shorter time to compassionate extubation. Further studies are needed with larger cohort sizes and validated pediatric palliative care outcome measurement tools to accurately determine if this change in care is driven by the underlying condition or knowledge of a molecular diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666241304320"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241304320","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Clinical utility of rapid whole genome sequencing (rWGS) has been reported in 30-70% of pediatric ICU patients who receive a molecular diagnosis. Rapid molecular diagnostic techniques have been increasingly integrated into critical care, yet the influence of genetic test results on palliative care related decision making is largely unknown. This study evaluates palliative care related outcomes after rWGS.

Design: Retrospective chart review.

Setting: Tertiary children's hospital.

Patients: Acutely ill children 18 years of age who received rWGS due to suspected genetic disease between July 2016 and November 2019.

Interventions: rWGS with associated precision medicine.

Measurements and main results: 536 patients underwent rWGS, of whom 152 (28.4%) received a molecular diagnosis. Diagnostic rWGS was associated with more code status modifications, an increase in palliative care inpatient consultations, and greater enrollment in home-based palliative services. A comparison of diagnostic and nondiagnostic rWGS groups where palliative decisions were made prior to reporting of genomic testing results did not identify differences between the groups. In the subset of patients who had palliative care interventions (n = 57, 53% with diagnostic rWGS), time to palliative care consultation and time to compassionate extubation were shorter for patients with rWGS-based diagnoses (Kaplan-Meier method, P = .008; P = .015). Significantly more patients in this subgroup with diagnostic rWGS received home-based palliative care (Chi-squared, P = .025, 95% CI [-0.47, -0.05]). Univariate Poisson regression indicated that diagnostic rWGS is associated with significantly fewer emergency visits, PICU admissions, and unplanned intubations.

Conclusions: Diagnostic rWGS correlates with more rapid engagement of pediatric palliative care services, higher enrollment rates in home-based palliative care, and shorter time to compassionate extubation. Further studies are needed with larger cohort sizes and validated pediatric palliative care outcome measurement tools to accurately determine if this change in care is driven by the underlying condition or knowledge of a molecular diagnosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快速全基因组测序后危重儿童的姑息治疗结果。
目的:快速全基因组测序(rWGS)在30-70%接受分子诊断的儿科ICU患者中的临床应用已被报道。快速分子诊断技术已经越来越多地集成到重症监护中,然而基因检测结果对姑息治疗相关决策的影响在很大程度上是未知的。本研究评估rWGS后的姑息治疗相关结果。设计:回顾性图表回顾。单位:三级儿童医院。患者:2016年7月至2019年11月期间因疑似遗传病接受rWGS治疗的≤18岁的急性患儿。干预措施:rWGS与相关的精准医学。测量和主要结果:536例患者接受了rWGS,其中152例(28.4%)接受了分子诊断。诊断性rWGS与更多的代码状态修改、姑息治疗住院咨询的增加以及更多的家庭姑息治疗服务登记相关。在报告基因组检测结果之前做出姑息决定的诊断性和非诊断性rWGS组之间的比较没有发现组间的差异。在接受姑息治疗干预的患者亚组(n = 57, 53%诊断性rWGS)中,基于rWGS诊断的患者进行姑息治疗咨询的时间和体恤拔管的时间更短(Kaplan-Meier法,P = 0.008;p = .015)。在诊断性rWGS的这个亚组中,有更多的患者接受了基于家庭的姑息治疗(χ 2, P =。0.25, 95% ci[-0.47, -0.05])。单变量泊松回归表明,诊断性rWGS与急诊就诊、PICU入院和计划外插管的显著减少有关。结论:诊断性rWGS与更快地接受儿科姑息治疗服务、更高的家庭姑息治疗入组率和更短的同情拔管时间相关。进一步的研究需要更大的队列规模和经过验证的儿科姑息治疗结果测量工具,以准确地确定这种护理变化是由潜在疾病还是分子诊断知识驱动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Sepsis Onset Timing on All-Cause Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Serial Lactate in Clinical Medicine - A Narrative Review. A Combined Model of Vital Signs and Serum Biomarkers Outperforms Shock Index in the Prediction of Hemorrhage Control Interventions in Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients. The Effects of Inspiratory Muscle Training in Critically ill Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Anticoagulation Monitoring Strategies During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Therapy - Differences Between Simultaneously Obtained Coagulation Tests: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1