Deep learning dose prediction to approach Erasmus-iCycle dosimetric plan quality within seconds for instantaneous treatment planning.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Radiotherapy and Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110662
Joep van Genderingen, Dan Nguyen, Franziska Knuth, Hazem A A Nomer, Luca Incrocci, Abdul Wahab M Sharfo, András Zolnay, Uwe Oelfke, Steve Jiang, Linda Rossi, Ben J M Heijmen, Sebastiaan Breedveld
{"title":"Deep learning dose prediction to approach Erasmus-iCycle dosimetric plan quality within seconds for instantaneous treatment planning.","authors":"Joep van Genderingen, Dan Nguyen, Franziska Knuth, Hazem A A Nomer, Luca Incrocci, Abdul Wahab M Sharfo, András Zolnay, Uwe Oelfke, Steve Jiang, Linda Rossi, Ben J M Heijmen, Sebastiaan Breedveld","doi":"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Fast, high-quality deep learning (DL) prediction of patient-specific 3D dose distributions can enable instantaneous treatment planning (IP), in which the treating physician can evaluate the dose and approve the plan immediately after contouring, rather than days later. This would greatly benefit clinical workload, patient waiting times and treatment quality. IP requires that predicted dose distributions closely match the ground truth. This study examines how training dataset size and model size affect dose prediction accuracy for Erasmus-iCycle GT plans to enable IP.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>For 1250 prostate patients, dose distributions were automatically generated using Erasmus-iCycle. Hierarchically Densely Connected U-Nets with 2/3/4/5/6 pooling layers were trained with datasets of 50/100/250/500/1000 patients, using a validation set of 100 patients. A fixed test set of 150 patients was used for evaluations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all model sizes, prediction accuracy increased with the number of training patients, without levelling off at 1000 patients. For 4-6 level models with 1000 training patients, prediction accuracies were high and comparable. For 6 levels and 1000 training patients, the median prediction errors and interquartile ranges for PTV V<sub>95%</sub>, rectum V<sub>75</sub><sub>Gy</sub> and bladder V<sub>65</sub><sub>Gy</sub> were 0.01 [-0.06,0.15], 0.01 [-0.20,0.29] and -0.02 [-0.27,0.27] %-point. Dose prediction times were around 1.2 s.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although even for 1000 training patients there was no convergence in obtained prediction accuracy yet, the accuracy for the 6-level model with 1000 training patients may be adequate for the pursued instantaneous planning, which is subject of further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"110662"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110662","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Fast, high-quality deep learning (DL) prediction of patient-specific 3D dose distributions can enable instantaneous treatment planning (IP), in which the treating physician can evaluate the dose and approve the plan immediately after contouring, rather than days later. This would greatly benefit clinical workload, patient waiting times and treatment quality. IP requires that predicted dose distributions closely match the ground truth. This study examines how training dataset size and model size affect dose prediction accuracy for Erasmus-iCycle GT plans to enable IP.

Materials and methods: For 1250 prostate patients, dose distributions were automatically generated using Erasmus-iCycle. Hierarchically Densely Connected U-Nets with 2/3/4/5/6 pooling layers were trained with datasets of 50/100/250/500/1000 patients, using a validation set of 100 patients. A fixed test set of 150 patients was used for evaluations.

Results: For all model sizes, prediction accuracy increased with the number of training patients, without levelling off at 1000 patients. For 4-6 level models with 1000 training patients, prediction accuracies were high and comparable. For 6 levels and 1000 training patients, the median prediction errors and interquartile ranges for PTV V95%, rectum V75Gy and bladder V65Gy were 0.01 [-0.06,0.15], 0.01 [-0.20,0.29] and -0.02 [-0.27,0.27] %-point. Dose prediction times were around 1.2 s.

Conclusion: Although even for 1000 training patients there was no convergence in obtained prediction accuracy yet, the accuracy for the 6-level model with 1000 training patients may be adequate for the pursued instantaneous planning, which is subject of further research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深度学习剂量预测,在几秒钟内接近Erasmus-iCycle剂量计计划质量,用于即时治疗计划。
背景和目的:快速、高质量的深度学习(DL)预测患者特异性3D剂量分布可以实现瞬时治疗计划(IP),其中治疗医生可以在轮廓后立即评估剂量并批准计划,而不是几天后。这将大大有利于临床工作量、患者等待时间和治疗质量。IP要求预测的剂量分布与实际情况密切匹配。本研究探讨了训练数据集大小和模型大小如何影响Erasmus-iCycle GT计划的剂量预测精度,以实现IP。材料与方法:采用Erasmus-iCycle自动生成1250例前列腺患者的剂量分布。使用100名患者的验证集,使用50/100/250/500/1000患者的数据集训练具有2/3/4/5/6池化层的分层密集连接U-Nets。采用固定的150例患者测试集进行评估。结果:对于所有模型大小,预测精度随着训练患者数量的增加而增加,在1000名患者时没有趋于稳定。对于有1000名训练患者的4-6级模型,预测精度很高,具有可比性。在6个水平、1000名训练患者中,PTV V95%、直肠V75Gy和膀胱V65Gy的中位预测误差和四分位数范围分别为0.01[-0.06,0.15]、0.01[-0.20,0.29]和-0.02 [-0.27,0.27]%-point。剂量预测时间约为1.2 s。结论:尽管对于1000名训练患者,所得到的预测精度还没有收敛,但对于1000名训练患者的6级模型,其精度可能足以满足所追求的瞬时计划,有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Radiotherapy and Oncology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.
期刊最新文献
Deglutition preservation after swallowing (SWOARs)-sparing IMRT in head and neck cancers: definitive results of a multicenter prospective study of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO). Association of the time of day of chemoradiotherapy and durvalumab with tumor control in lung cancer. Aiming for patient safety indicators in radiation oncology - Results from a systematic literature review as part of the PaSaGeRO study. Randomized trials: When scientific rigor meets field reality. A prognostic and predictive model based on deep learning to identify optimal candidates for intensity-modulated radiotherapy alone in patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1