Causes of Revision of Total Knee Arthroplasties in a Tertiary Hospital in Brazil.

Q3 Medicine Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia Pub Date : 2024-12-07 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1757304
Alan de Paula Mozella, Hugo Alexandre de Araújo Barros Cobra, Sandra Tie Nishibe Minamoto, Rodrigo Salim, Ana Carolina Leal
{"title":"Causes of Revision of Total Knee Arthroplasties in a Tertiary Hospital in Brazil.","authors":"Alan de Paula Mozella, Hugo Alexandre de Araújo Barros Cobra, Sandra Tie Nishibe Minamoto, Rodrigo Salim, Ana Carolina Leal","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1757304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>  To identify the causes of revision of total knee arthroplasty in a referral center in Brazil. <b>Methods</b>  This is a case series, with 80 patients undergoing revision surgery for total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) at a referral center for knee surgery, between August 2019 and November 2021, with a mean age of 69.6 years. Of these patients, 60.23% were female and 39.77% were male. The average body mass index (BMI) was 30.23 kg/m <sup>2</sup> . The causes of TKA failure were defined as: periprosthetic infection according to the 2018 International Consensus Meeting criteria, ligament instability, range of motion limitation, periprosthetic fracture, malalignment, aseptic loosening, pain due to non-replacement of the patellar cartilage, polyethylene wear, fracture of implants, insufficiency of the extensor mechanism. <b>Results</b>  Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) was the main cause of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), corresponding to 47.73% of cases. Aseptic loosening of one or more components represented the second most frequent reason for TKA failure, accounting for 35.23% of revisions. Range of motion limitation represented the third most frequent cause, accounting for 5.68% of surgeries. Instability was the fourth most frequent reason for RTKA, occurring in 4.55% of patients. The other causes of revision were: periprosthetic fracture (3.41%), failure due to rupture of the extensor mechanism (2.27%), and pain attributed to non-replacement of the patellar cartilage (1.14%). <b>Conclusions</b>  Periprosthetic joint infection was the most frequent cause of TKA revision in our series. Other reasons for TKA failures were, in descending order: aseptic loosening, limited range of motion, and instability.</p>","PeriodicalId":21536,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia","volume":"59 5","pages":"e696-e701"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11624922/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective  To identify the causes of revision of total knee arthroplasty in a referral center in Brazil. Methods  This is a case series, with 80 patients undergoing revision surgery for total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) at a referral center for knee surgery, between August 2019 and November 2021, with a mean age of 69.6 years. Of these patients, 60.23% were female and 39.77% were male. The average body mass index (BMI) was 30.23 kg/m 2 . The causes of TKA failure were defined as: periprosthetic infection according to the 2018 International Consensus Meeting criteria, ligament instability, range of motion limitation, periprosthetic fracture, malalignment, aseptic loosening, pain due to non-replacement of the patellar cartilage, polyethylene wear, fracture of implants, insufficiency of the extensor mechanism. Results  Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) was the main cause of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), corresponding to 47.73% of cases. Aseptic loosening of one or more components represented the second most frequent reason for TKA failure, accounting for 35.23% of revisions. Range of motion limitation represented the third most frequent cause, accounting for 5.68% of surgeries. Instability was the fourth most frequent reason for RTKA, occurring in 4.55% of patients. The other causes of revision were: periprosthetic fracture (3.41%), failure due to rupture of the extensor mechanism (2.27%), and pain attributed to non-replacement of the patellar cartilage (1.14%). Conclusions  Periprosthetic joint infection was the most frequent cause of TKA revision in our series. Other reasons for TKA failures were, in descending order: aseptic loosening, limited range of motion, and instability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西某三级医院全膝关节置换术翻修的原因分析
目的探讨巴西某转诊中心全膝关节置换术翻修的原因。这是一个病例系列,包括2019年8月至2021年11月在膝关节手术转诊中心接受全膝关节置换术(RTKA)翻修手术的80例患者,平均年龄为69.6岁。其中女性占60.23%,男性占39.77%。平均体重指数(BMI)为30.23 kg/ m2。TKA失败的原因被定义为:根据2018年国际共识会议标准,假体周围感染,韧带不稳定,活动范围限制,假体周围骨折,错位,无菌性松动,髌骨软骨未置换引起的疼痛,聚乙烯磨损,植入物骨折,伸肌机制不全。结果假体周围关节感染(PJI)是翻修型全膝关节置换术(TKA)的主要原因,占47.73%。一个或多个部件的无菌松动是TKA失败的第二大常见原因,占修订的35.23%。活动范围受限是第三大常见原因,占手术的5.68%。不稳定是RTKA的第四大常见原因,发生率为4.55%。其他翻修的原因有:假体周围骨折(3.41%)、伸肌机制断裂失败(2.27%)和未置换髌骨软骨引起的疼痛(1.14%)。结论:假体周围关节感染是TKA翻修最常见的原因。TKA失败的其他原因依次为:无菌性松动、活动范围受限和不稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
142
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hip Hemiarthroplasty in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Case Series and Review of the Literature. Long-term Outcomes 18 Years after the Arthroscopic Fixation of a Scapular Articular Fracture: A Case Report. Malunion in a Self-stabilized Fracture of the Odontoid Process Type II with a Chronic Anterior Atlantoaxial Subluxation in a Neurologically Intact Patient: A Case Report. Reichel Syndrome in Children: A Case Report. Minimally-invasive Distal Metatarsal Diaphyseal Osteotomy in the Treatment of Plantar Ulcer in the Diabetic Foot: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1