Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Two Techniques in the Arthroscopic Treatment of Partial Articular Rotator Cuff Tears after Six Years of Follow-up.

Q3 Medicine Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia Pub Date : 2024-12-07 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1790211
Guilherme do Val Sella, Luciana Andrade da Silva, Ricardo Makoto Okamoto, Hector Carmona Marmille, Pedro Gabriel Pelegrino do Val, Alberto Naoki Miyazaki
{"title":"Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Two Techniques in the Arthroscopic Treatment of Partial Articular Rotator Cuff Tears after Six Years of Follow-up.","authors":"Guilherme do Val Sella, Luciana Andrade da Silva, Ricardo Makoto Okamoto, Hector Carmona Marmille, Pedro Gabriel Pelegrino do Val, Alberto Naoki Miyazaki","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1790211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>  To clinically evaluate the medium-term results of the arthroscopic treatment of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCT) using the transtendon repair (TTR) technique and the tear completion repair (TCR) technique through the modified University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Rating Scale, the Constant-Murley score, and force analysis. <b>Methods</b>  The present was a retrospective reevaluation study of cases operated on arthroscopically for PTRCT after a minimum follow-up of 6 years. There were 34 patients, 18 of whom underwent TTR and 16, TCR. We compared the current UCLA and Constant-Murley scores, the mean strength between the techniques, and the UCLA score currently and 2 years after surgery for the same group, as published in a previous study, to assess whether or not the results changed throughout time. <b>Results</b>  There was no statistical difference regarding the scores. The current UCLA scores were of 33.8 for the TTR and of 32.9 for the TCR ( <i>p</i>  = 0.113), and the current Constant-Murley scores were of 91.9 and 86.8 respectively ( <i>p</i>  = 0.075). For the TTR, the previous UCLA score was (2 years postoperatively) of 32.4 and the current score was of 33.8 ( <i>p</i>  = 0.374); for the TCR, the score after 2 years was of 32.4, and the current score was of 32.9 ( <i>p</i>  = 0.859). In the TTR, the mean strength was statistically higher on the dominant side (11 kg) than on the non-dominant side (7.80 kg) ( <i>p</i>  = 0.023) and those of the TCR (8.25 kg) ( <i>p</i>  = 0.042). <b>Conclusion</b>  There was no statistical difference in the medium term when comparing the UCLA and Constant-Murley scores concerning the technique used (TTR or TCR), nor was there any change in UCLA scores between 2 and 6 years postoperatively. Among the patients submitted to TTR, the mean strength was statistically higher on the dominant side than on the non-dominant side, and higher than that of the patients submitted to TCR.</p>","PeriodicalId":21536,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia","volume":"59 5","pages":"e771-e778"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11624924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1790211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective  To clinically evaluate the medium-term results of the arthroscopic treatment of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCT) using the transtendon repair (TTR) technique and the tear completion repair (TCR) technique through the modified University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Rating Scale, the Constant-Murley score, and force analysis. Methods  The present was a retrospective reevaluation study of cases operated on arthroscopically for PTRCT after a minimum follow-up of 6 years. There were 34 patients, 18 of whom underwent TTR and 16, TCR. We compared the current UCLA and Constant-Murley scores, the mean strength between the techniques, and the UCLA score currently and 2 years after surgery for the same group, as published in a previous study, to assess whether or not the results changed throughout time. Results  There was no statistical difference regarding the scores. The current UCLA scores were of 33.8 for the TTR and of 32.9 for the TCR ( p  = 0.113), and the current Constant-Murley scores were of 91.9 and 86.8 respectively ( p  = 0.075). For the TTR, the previous UCLA score was (2 years postoperatively) of 32.4 and the current score was of 33.8 ( p  = 0.374); for the TCR, the score after 2 years was of 32.4, and the current score was of 32.9 ( p  = 0.859). In the TTR, the mean strength was statistically higher on the dominant side (11 kg) than on the non-dominant side (7.80 kg) ( p  = 0.023) and those of the TCR (8.25 kg) ( p  = 0.042). Conclusion  There was no statistical difference in the medium term when comparing the UCLA and Constant-Murley scores concerning the technique used (TTR or TCR), nor was there any change in UCLA scores between 2 and 6 years postoperatively. Among the patients submitted to TTR, the mean strength was statistically higher on the dominant side than on the non-dominant side, and higher than that of the patients submitted to TCR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种技术在关节镜下治疗部分关节袖撕裂6年随访后的临床比较评价。
目的 通过改良的加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)肩关节评分量表、Constant-Murley 评分和力量分析,对使用经腱修复(TTR)技术和撕裂完成修复(TCR)技术在关节镜下治疗部分厚度肩袖撕裂(PTRCT)的中期效果进行临床评估。方法 本研究是对至少随访 6 年后在关节镜下接受 PTRCT 手术的病例进行的回顾性再评估。共有 34 例患者,其中 18 例接受了 TTR,16 例接受了 TCR。我们比较了当前的 UCLA 评分和 Constant-Murley 评分、两种技术的平均强度以及同一组患者术前和术后 2 年的 UCLA 评分(如之前研究中公布的),以评估结果是否随着时间的推移而发生变化。结果 在评分方面没有统计学差异。TTR 和 TCR 目前的 UCLA 评分分别为 33.8 分和 32.9 分(P = 0.113),目前的 Constant-Murley 评分分别为 91.9 分和 86.8 分(P = 0.075)。对于 TTR,UCLA 先前的评分(术后 2 年)为 32.4,当前评分为 33.8 ( p = 0.374);对于 TCR,2 年后的评分为 32.4,当前评分为 32.9 ( p = 0.859)。据统计,TTR 的优势侧平均力量(11 千克)高于非优势侧(7.80 千克)(P = 0.023),TCR 的优势侧平均力量(8.25 千克)高于非优势侧(8.25 千克)(P = 0.042)。结论 在中期比较 UCLA 和 Constant-Murley 评分时,所使用的技术(TTR 或 TCR)没有统计学差异,术后 2 年至 6 年 UCLA 评分也没有任何变化。据统计,在接受 TTR 治疗的患者中,优势侧的平均力量高于非优势侧,也高于接受 TCR 治疗的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
142
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hip Hemiarthroplasty in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Case Series and Review of the Literature. Long-term Outcomes 18 Years after the Arthroscopic Fixation of a Scapular Articular Fracture: A Case Report. Malunion in a Self-stabilized Fracture of the Odontoid Process Type II with a Chronic Anterior Atlantoaxial Subluxation in a Neurologically Intact Patient: A Case Report. Reichel Syndrome in Children: A Case Report. Minimally-invasive Distal Metatarsal Diaphyseal Osteotomy in the Treatment of Plantar Ulcer in the Diabetic Foot: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1