Prognostic Value of Four Objective Nutritional Indices in Predicting Long-Term Prognosis in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Clinical Interventions in Aging Pub Date : 2024-12-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CIA.S493726
Qingwei He, Xingman Fan, Bowen Li, Qiongyi He, Yukun Cao, Haitao Zhang
{"title":"Prognostic Value of Four Objective Nutritional Indices in Predicting Long-Term Prognosis in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Qingwei He, Xingman Fan, Bowen Li, Qiongyi He, Yukun Cao, Haitao Zhang","doi":"10.2147/CIA.S493726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several objective and comprehensive nutritional assessment methods have been used for predicting adverse outcomes in elderly patients with various diseases. However, their predictive value for long-term adverse outcomes in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear. This study aimed to explore the prognostic significance of the four nutritional indices, namely Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT), and High-Sensitivity Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (HS-mGPS), in evaluating the long-term prognosis in elderly patients with AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted at a single center and included a total of 261 elderly patients with AF from December 2015 to December 2021. Patients were divided into all-cause death and survival groups based on the follow-up results. Kaplan-Meier analysis and COX regression were conducted to explore the relationship between all-cause mortality and nutritional scores. In addition, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the predictive value of the four nutritional screening tools for the endpoint event.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the follow-up period, 119 cases (45.59%) of all-cause mortality were recorded. The cumulative incidence of all-cause death was significantly higher in participants with a lower PNI, lower GNRI, higher CONUT, and higher HS-mGPS levels. And the low PNI (HR 1.325, 95% CI 1.032-2.857, P=0.025) and the high HS-mGPS (HR 2.166, 95% CI 1.281-4.326, P=0.023) groups were independently and significantly associated with increased risk of all-cause death analyzed by multivariate COX regression. Additionally, PNI showed the best area under the curve value (AUC: 0.696, 95% CI 0.632-0.760 P < 0.001) for the prediction of all-cause mortality compared with the other nutritional indices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among the four nutritional risk screening tools, PNI might be a simple and useful indicator in predicting the long-term prognosis of elderly patients with AF.</p>","PeriodicalId":48841,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","volume":"19 ","pages":"2043-2056"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11625436/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S493726","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several objective and comprehensive nutritional assessment methods have been used for predicting adverse outcomes in elderly patients with various diseases. However, their predictive value for long-term adverse outcomes in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear. This study aimed to explore the prognostic significance of the four nutritional indices, namely Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT), and High-Sensitivity Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (HS-mGPS), in evaluating the long-term prognosis in elderly patients with AF.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at a single center and included a total of 261 elderly patients with AF from December 2015 to December 2021. Patients were divided into all-cause death and survival groups based on the follow-up results. Kaplan-Meier analysis and COX regression were conducted to explore the relationship between all-cause mortality and nutritional scores. In addition, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the predictive value of the four nutritional screening tools for the endpoint event.

Results: During the follow-up period, 119 cases (45.59%) of all-cause mortality were recorded. The cumulative incidence of all-cause death was significantly higher in participants with a lower PNI, lower GNRI, higher CONUT, and higher HS-mGPS levels. And the low PNI (HR 1.325, 95% CI 1.032-2.857, P=0.025) and the high HS-mGPS (HR 2.166, 95% CI 1.281-4.326, P=0.023) groups were independently and significantly associated with increased risk of all-cause death analyzed by multivariate COX regression. Additionally, PNI showed the best area under the curve value (AUC: 0.696, 95% CI 0.632-0.760 P < 0.001) for the prediction of all-cause mortality compared with the other nutritional indices.

Conclusion: Among the four nutritional risk screening tools, PNI might be a simple and useful indicator in predicting the long-term prognosis of elderly patients with AF.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四项客观营养指标在预测老年房颤患者长期预后中的预后价值:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:几种客观、全面的营养评估方法已被用于预测老年各种疾病患者的不良结局。然而,它们对老年心房颤动(AF)患者长期不良结局的预测价值尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨预后营养指数(PNI)、老年营养风险指数(GNRI)、控制营养状况(CONUT)和高灵敏度修正格拉斯哥预后评分(HS-mGPS)四项营养指标在评价老年af患者长期预后中的预后意义。本回顾性研究在单中心进行,共纳入2015年12月至2021年12月261例老年房颤患者。根据随访结果将患者分为全因死亡组和生存组。采用Kaplan-Meier分析和COX回归探讨全因死亡率与营养评分之间的关系。此外,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线比较四种营养筛查工具对终点事件的预测价值。结果:随访期间共记录全因死亡率119例,占45.59%。低PNI、低GNRI、高CONUT和高HS-mGPS水平的参与者,全因死亡的累积发生率明显更高。多因素COX回归分析,低PNI组(HR 1.325, 95% CI 1.032 ~ 2.857, P=0.025)和高HS-mGPS组(HR 2.166, 95% CI 1.281 ~ 4.326, P=0.023)与全因死亡风险增加独立且显著相关。与其他营养指标相比,PNI曲线下面积(AUC: 0.696, 95% CI 0.632 ~ 0.760 P < 0.001)预测全因死亡率最佳。结论:在4种营养风险筛查工具中,PNI可能是预测老年房颤患者长期预后的一种简单有效的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Clinical Interventions in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
193
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Interventions in Aging, is an online, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on concise rapid reporting of original research and reviews in aging. Special attention will be given to papers reporting on actual or potential clinical applications leading to improved prevention or treatment of disease or a greater understanding of pathological processes that result from maladaptive changes in the body associated with aging. This journal is directed at a wide array of scientists, engineers, pharmacists, pharmacologists and clinical specialists wishing to maintain an up to date knowledge of this exciting and emerging field.
期刊最新文献
Traditional Chinese Medicine Constitution and Cognitive Frailty in Older Adults: Prediction Models and Sleep-Quality Mediation Pathway from a Multicenter Study in China. Older Patients' Postoperative Neurocognitive Recovery: A Narrative Review. A Pelvic Floor Muscle Training-Based Complex Intervention for Community-Dwelling Older Women with Urinary Incontinence: A Feasibility Study and Process Evaluation. Global Poorer Olfaction, Frailty and Postoperative Adverse Outcomes: Exploring Their Interplay in a Prospective Cohort of Older Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery. Association Between Fibrinogen-to-Albumin Ratio and Long-Term Mortality in Senile Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Prospective 10-Year Follow-up Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1