Syed Muhammad Mehdi Zaidi, Mustafa Hassan Alvi, Syed Ashad Ahmed Fatmi, Laraib Abbasi, Ammar Hayat, Qunoot Irfan, Sana Zehra, Zainab Abbas, Syed Muhammad Askari Zaidi
{"title":"Effectiveness of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) for managing post-stroke dysphagia: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Syed Muhammad Mehdi Zaidi, Mustafa Hassan Alvi, Syed Ashad Ahmed Fatmi, Laraib Abbasi, Ammar Hayat, Qunoot Irfan, Sana Zehra, Zainab Abbas, Syed Muhammad Askari Zaidi","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2024.2437325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-Stroke Dysphagia (PSD) is a common complication that significantly affects the quality of life and health outcomes of stroke survivors. Traditional treatments often have limitations, necessitating the exploration of new therapeutic approaches. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) as an innovative treatment for PSD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to July 2024. Studies included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving stroke patients with confirmed dysphagia, comparing iTBS to control treatments. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Primary outcomes were changes in the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and Swallowing Severity Scale (SSA). Meta-analyses were conducted using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four RCTs with a total of 199 participants were included. iTBS significantly improved SSA (MD = -3.26, 95% CI [-4.66, -1.86], <i>p</i> < 0.001) and PAS (MD = -1.67, 95% CI [-2.49, -0.86], <i>p</i> < 0.001) immediately after treatment compared to sham stimulation. No significant adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>iTBS appears to have a positive immediate effect on improving swallowing function and reducing aspiration risk in PSD patients compared to sham stimulation. However, these effects may not persist in the long term, and further large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm these findings and establish standardized treatment protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2437325","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Post-Stroke Dysphagia (PSD) is a common complication that significantly affects the quality of life and health outcomes of stroke survivors. Traditional treatments often have limitations, necessitating the exploration of new therapeutic approaches. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) as an innovative treatment for PSD.
Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to July 2024. Studies included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving stroke patients with confirmed dysphagia, comparing iTBS to control treatments. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Primary outcomes were changes in the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and Swallowing Severity Scale (SSA). Meta-analyses were conducted using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4.
Results: Four RCTs with a total of 199 participants were included. iTBS significantly improved SSA (MD = -3.26, 95% CI [-4.66, -1.86], p < 0.001) and PAS (MD = -1.67, 95% CI [-2.49, -0.86], p < 0.001) immediately after treatment compared to sham stimulation. No significant adverse events were reported.
Conclusion: iTBS appears to have a positive immediate effect on improving swallowing function and reducing aspiration risk in PSD patients compared to sham stimulation. However, these effects may not persist in the long term, and further large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm these findings and establish standardized treatment protocols.
期刊介绍:
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues.
The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.