Preventive effect of probiotics on infections following colorectal cancer surgery: An umbrella meta-analysis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.4240/wjgs.v16.i11.3546
Yue Han, Yong Wang, Min Guan
{"title":"Preventive effect of probiotics on infections following colorectal cancer surgery: An umbrella meta-analysis.","authors":"Yue Han, Yong Wang, Min Guan","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i11.3546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative infections remain a significant source of morbidity among patients undergoing colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. While probiotics have been proposed as a potential strategy to mitigate the risk of these infections, contemporary meta-analyses have produced conflicting findings.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To synthesize the available evidence regarding the prophylactic efficacy of probiotics in preventing infections following CRC surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed and Scopus was conducted to identify relevant meta-analyses published up to February 2024. To assess the efficacy of probiotics on outcomes, relative risks (RR) and their corresponding 95%CI were pooled using a random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This comprehensive umbrella meta-analysis integrated eleven meta-analyses encompassing 11518 participants who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Probiotics administration resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of total infections (RR: 0.40, 95%CI: 0.31-0.51; moderate certainty), surgical site infections (RR: 0.56, 95%CI: 0.49-0.63; high certainty), pneumonia (RR: 0.38, 95%CI: 0.30-0.48; high certainty), urinary tract infections (RR: 0.44, 95%CI: 0.31-0.61; moderate certainty), bacteremia (RR: 0.41, 95%CI: 0.30-0.56; high certainty), and sepsis (RR: 0.35, 95%CI: 0.25-0.44; high certainty). However, probiotics did not significantly affect intra-abdominal, central line, or peritoneal infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Probiotics have demonstrated potential in mitigating postoperative infectious complications among patients undergoing CRC surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"16 11","pages":"3546-3558"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i11.3546","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postoperative infections remain a significant source of morbidity among patients undergoing colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. While probiotics have been proposed as a potential strategy to mitigate the risk of these infections, contemporary meta-analyses have produced conflicting findings.

Aim: To synthesize the available evidence regarding the prophylactic efficacy of probiotics in preventing infections following CRC surgery.

Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed and Scopus was conducted to identify relevant meta-analyses published up to February 2024. To assess the efficacy of probiotics on outcomes, relative risks (RR) and their corresponding 95%CI were pooled using a random effects model.

Results: This comprehensive umbrella meta-analysis integrated eleven meta-analyses encompassing 11518 participants who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Probiotics administration resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of total infections (RR: 0.40, 95%CI: 0.31-0.51; moderate certainty), surgical site infections (RR: 0.56, 95%CI: 0.49-0.63; high certainty), pneumonia (RR: 0.38, 95%CI: 0.30-0.48; high certainty), urinary tract infections (RR: 0.44, 95%CI: 0.31-0.61; moderate certainty), bacteremia (RR: 0.41, 95%CI: 0.30-0.56; high certainty), and sepsis (RR: 0.35, 95%CI: 0.25-0.44; high certainty). However, probiotics did not significantly affect intra-abdominal, central line, or peritoneal infections.

Conclusion: Probiotics have demonstrated potential in mitigating postoperative infectious complications among patients undergoing CRC surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
益生菌对结直肠癌手术后感染的预防作用:一项综合荟萃分析。
背景:术后感染仍然是结直肠癌(CRC)手术患者发病率的重要来源。虽然益生菌被认为是降低这些感染风险的潜在策略,但当代荟萃分析产生了相互矛盾的发现。目的:综合现有证据,探讨益生菌对结直肠癌术后感染的预防作用。方法:综合检索PubMed和Scopus,确定截至2024年2月发表的相关meta分析。为了评估益生菌对预后的影响,使用随机效应模型汇总了相对风险(RR)及其相应的95%CI。结果:该综合综合荟萃分析纳入了11项荟萃分析,包括11518名符合纳入标准的受试者。服用益生菌可显著降低总感染发生率(RR: 0.40, 95%CI: 0.31-0.51;中等确定性),手术部位感染(RR: 0.56, 95%CI: 0.49-0.63;高确定性)、肺炎(RR: 0.38, 95%CI: 0.30-0.48;高确定性)、尿路感染(RR: 0.44, 95%CI: 0.31-0.61;中度确定性)、菌血症(RR: 0.41, 95%CI: 0.30-0.56;高确定性)和脓毒症(RR: 0.35, 95%CI: 0.25-0.44;高确定性)。然而,益生菌对腹腔内、中央静脉或腹膜感染没有显著影响。结论:益生菌具有减轻结直肠癌手术患者术后感染并发症的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
期刊最新文献
Five-year complete remission of super-giant hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatectomy followed by sorafenib plus camrelizumab: A case report. Gastrointestinal bleeding after pancreatoduodenectomy: Report of four cases. Improving predictive accuracy of early recurrence in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Role of postoperative serum tumor markers. Influence factors of clinical effects on patients with early gastric cancer: A retrospective study. Laparoscopic hepatectomy using indocyanine green attenuates postoperative inflammatory response for hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1