Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI) and Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB) Use are Associated With Increased Readmission After Ileostomy Creation.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY American Surgeon Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1177/00031348241307396
Connie Y Gan, Shahrose Rahman, Shaun R Flerchinger, Jeffrey S Barton
{"title":"Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI) and Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB) Use are Associated With Increased Readmission After Ileostomy Creation.","authors":"Connie Y Gan, Shahrose Rahman, Shaun R Flerchinger, Jeffrey S Barton","doi":"10.1177/00031348241307396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High output is a common cause for readmission after new ileostomy creation. The loss of sodium leads to compensatory activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are first-line therapy for hypertension in the United States. We hypothesized that concurrent use of ACEI/ARB increases the risk of readmission following new ileostomy creation due to the loss of this compensatory mechanism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing ileostomy creation between 2009-2022 at an integrated managed health care system were included in this retrospective study. Primary outcomes were hospital readmission and ED visit within 30-days. Additional variables included ACEI/ARB use, ileostomy type, Charlson Comorbidity Index, additional antihypertensives at discharge (furosemide, hydrochlorothiazide, spironolactone, amlodipine, nifedipine, and diltiazem), and readmission diagnosis. Descriptive and advanced statistical analysis was completed with SPSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 540 patients, 41.9% were readmitted or visited an ED within 30 days. There was no difference in readmission or ED visit based on age, gender, or ileostomy type. Patients discharged with ACEI/ARB (37.4% vs 25.5%, <i>P</i> = .005) and additional antihypertensives (37.2% vs 17.3%, <i>P</i> = .006) were at a higher risk for readmission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inhibition of RAAS is associated with increased risk for hospital readmission. In patients with hypertension undergoing ileostomy creation, individualized care plans are needed with earlier antimotility agent use or intravenous rehydration plans.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348241307396"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241307396","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High output is a common cause for readmission after new ileostomy creation. The loss of sodium leads to compensatory activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are first-line therapy for hypertension in the United States. We hypothesized that concurrent use of ACEI/ARB increases the risk of readmission following new ileostomy creation due to the loss of this compensatory mechanism.

Methods: Patients undergoing ileostomy creation between 2009-2022 at an integrated managed health care system were included in this retrospective study. Primary outcomes were hospital readmission and ED visit within 30-days. Additional variables included ACEI/ARB use, ileostomy type, Charlson Comorbidity Index, additional antihypertensives at discharge (furosemide, hydrochlorothiazide, spironolactone, amlodipine, nifedipine, and diltiazem), and readmission diagnosis. Descriptive and advanced statistical analysis was completed with SPSS.

Results: Of 540 patients, 41.9% were readmitted or visited an ED within 30 days. There was no difference in readmission or ED visit based on age, gender, or ileostomy type. Patients discharged with ACEI/ARB (37.4% vs 25.5%, P = .005) and additional antihypertensives (37.2% vs 17.3%, P = .006) were at a higher risk for readmission.

Conclusions: Inhibition of RAAS is associated with increased risk for hospital readmission. In patients with hypertension undergoing ileostomy creation, individualized care plans are needed with earlier antimotility agent use or intravenous rehydration plans.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)的使用与回肠造口术后再入院率增加有关。
背景:高输出量是新造回造口术后再入院的常见原因。钠的损失导致肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统(RAAS)的代偿性激活。在美国,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)是高血压的一线治疗药物。我们假设同时使用ACEI/ARB会由于失去这种代偿机制而增加新造回造口后再入院的风险。方法:回顾性研究2009-2022年间在综合管理卫生保健系统进行回肠造口术的患者。主要结局是30天内再次住院和急诊室就诊。其他变量包括ACEI/ARB使用、回肠造口类型、Charlson合并症指数、出院时额外的抗高血压药物(呋塞米、氢氯噻嗪、螺内酯、氨氯地平、硝苯地平和地尔硫卓)和再入院诊断。描述性和高级统计分析用SPSS软件完成。结果:在540例患者中,41.9%的患者在30天内再次入院或访问急诊室。年龄、性别或回肠造口类型在再入院或急诊科就诊方面没有差异。合并ACEI/ARB (37.4% vs 25.5%, P = 0.005)和其他抗高血压药物(37.2% vs 17.3%, P = 0.006)出院的患者再入院风险更高。结论:抑制RAAS与再入院风险增加有关。对于接受回肠造口术的高血压患者,需要个性化的护理计划,尽早使用抗运动药物或静脉补液计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
期刊最新文献
Inpatient Cost of Trauma Care Versus Repair of Elective Open Inguinal Hernias: Nationwide Trends Over Nearly a Decade. Axilla Management in Breast Cancer Surgery: Brief Review and Current Practice Recommendations. Paramedic Judgment as a Basis for Trauma Triage: Is it an Effective Strategy? Mental Practice, Visualization, and Mental Imagery in Surgery: a Systematic Review. Expression of Concern.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1