Influence of Donor Transfusion on Heart Transplantation Outcomes: A United Network for Organ Sharing Registry Analysis

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Clinical Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1111/ctr.70053
Sooyun Caroline Tavolacci, Vasiliki Gregory, Kenji Okumura, Ameesh Isath, Junichi Shimamura, David Spielvogel, Suguru Ohira
{"title":"Influence of Donor Transfusion on Heart Transplantation Outcomes: A United Network for Organ Sharing Registry Analysis","authors":"Sooyun Caroline Tavolacci,&nbsp;Vasiliki Gregory,&nbsp;Kenji Okumura,&nbsp;Ameesh Isath,&nbsp;Junichi Shimamura,&nbsp;David Spielvogel,&nbsp;Suguru Ohira","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>There is a lack of evidence regarding the impact of donor blood transfusion on heart transplant (HT) outcomes. We sought to elucidate the influence of donor transfusion on HT outcomes using the national database.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>From January 2004 to March 2023, donor transfusion information was available for 40 538 recipients for HT in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. We used the UNOS 4-level designation of transfusion (no blood [<i>N</i> = 18 575], 1–5 units [<i>N</i> = 14 098], 6–10 units [<i>N</i> = 4766], and massive transfusion of &gt; 10 units [<i>N</i> = 3099]).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among this cohort, 53.2% of donors (<i>N</i> = 20 220) received a blood transfusion during the same admission. Donors who required blood transfusion commonly had head trauma as a cause of death (no-blood, 22% vs. 1–5 units, 61%, 6–10 units, 88%, massive, 89%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). An increased amount of donor blood transfusion did not affect rates of acute rejection (no-blood, 18% vs. 1–5 units, 19%, 6–10 units, 17%, massive, 19%, <i>p</i> = 0.13). The number of units transfused also did not affect 1-year survival rates. The Cox hazard model showed no effect of massive transfusion on mortality following transplant (no-blood, reference vs. 1–5 units; HR, 1.02 [<i>p</i> = 0.35], 6–10 units; HR, 1.10 [<i>p</i> = 0.01], massive transfusion; HR 1.04 [<i>p</i> = 0.3]).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Massive transfusion in donors was not associated with increased recipient mortality. Additionally, the amount of donor blood transfusion did not affect rejection rates following HT. The present study suggests that a history of donor blood transfusion, as well as the amount of transfusion, should not preclude donor heart utilization.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"38 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

There is a lack of evidence regarding the impact of donor blood transfusion on heart transplant (HT) outcomes. We sought to elucidate the influence of donor transfusion on HT outcomes using the national database.

Methods

From January 2004 to March 2023, donor transfusion information was available for 40 538 recipients for HT in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. We used the UNOS 4-level designation of transfusion (no blood [N = 18 575], 1–5 units [N = 14 098], 6–10 units [N = 4766], and massive transfusion of > 10 units [N = 3099]).

Results

Among this cohort, 53.2% of donors (N = 20 220) received a blood transfusion during the same admission. Donors who required blood transfusion commonly had head trauma as a cause of death (no-blood, 22% vs. 1–5 units, 61%, 6–10 units, 88%, massive, 89%, p < 0.001). An increased amount of donor blood transfusion did not affect rates of acute rejection (no-blood, 18% vs. 1–5 units, 19%, 6–10 units, 17%, massive, 19%, p = 0.13). The number of units transfused also did not affect 1-year survival rates. The Cox hazard model showed no effect of massive transfusion on mortality following transplant (no-blood, reference vs. 1–5 units; HR, 1.02 [p = 0.35], 6–10 units; HR, 1.10 [p = 0.01], massive transfusion; HR 1.04 [p = 0.3]).

Conclusions

Massive transfusion in donors was not associated with increased recipient mortality. Additionally, the amount of donor blood transfusion did not affect rejection rates following HT. The present study suggests that a history of donor blood transfusion, as well as the amount of transfusion, should not preclude donor heart utilization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
捐献者输血对心脏移植结果的影响:器官共享联合网络登记处分析。
关于供者输血对心脏移植(HT)结果的影响缺乏证据。我们试图利用国家数据库阐明供体输血对HT结果的影响。方法:从2004年1月至2023年3月,在联合器官共享网络(UNOS)数据库中获取40538例HT受体的供者输血信息。我们采用UNOS 4级输血标准(无血[N = 18 575], 1-5单位[N = 14 098], 6-10单位[N = 4766],大量输血bbb10单位[N = 3099])。结果:在该队列中,53.2%的献血者(N = 20220)在同一次入院期间接受了输血。需要输血的献血者通常以头部创伤作为死亡原因(无血,22% vs. 1-5单位,61%,6-10单位,88%,大量,89%,p < 0.001)。供者输血量的增加不影响急性排斥反应的发生率(无血18% vs. 1-5单位,19%,6-10单位,17%,大量,19%,p = 0.13)。输血单位数也不影响1年生存率。Cox风险模型显示大量输血对移植后死亡率没有影响(无血对照1-5单位;HR, 1.02 [p = 0.35], 6-10个单位;HR, 1.10 [p = 0.01],大量输血;HR 1.04 [p = 0.3])。结论:供体大量输血与受体死亡率增加无关。此外,供者输血量不影响HT后的排异率。目前的研究表明,献血者输血史以及输血量不应排除献血者的心脏利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
期刊最新文献
Flying Kidneys or Flying Donors: What Do Prior Canadian Living Kidney Donors Think? Individual Association of Predicted Left and Right Ventricular Mass Ratios With Survival After Heart Transplantation: A UNOS Database Analysis Liver Transplant Fast-Track With an Emphasis on Reduced Delirium: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Reducing Length of Stay Hybrid Telemedicine and In-Person Care for Kidney Transplant Follow-Up: A Qualitative Study Is Survival Impacted by One or Several Successive Cancers After Liver Transplantation? A French National Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1