{"title":"Influence of Donor Transfusion on Heart Transplantation Outcomes: A United Network for Organ Sharing Registry Analysis","authors":"Sooyun Caroline Tavolacci, Vasiliki Gregory, Kenji Okumura, Ameesh Isath, Junichi Shimamura, David Spielvogel, Suguru Ohira","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>There is a lack of evidence regarding the impact of donor blood transfusion on heart transplant (HT) outcomes. We sought to elucidate the influence of donor transfusion on HT outcomes using the national database.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>From January 2004 to March 2023, donor transfusion information was available for 40 538 recipients for HT in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. We used the UNOS 4-level designation of transfusion (no blood [<i>N</i> = 18 575], 1–5 units [<i>N</i> = 14 098], 6–10 units [<i>N</i> = 4766], and massive transfusion of > 10 units [<i>N</i> = 3099]).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among this cohort, 53.2% of donors (<i>N</i> = 20 220) received a blood transfusion during the same admission. Donors who required blood transfusion commonly had head trauma as a cause of death (no-blood, 22% vs. 1–5 units, 61%, 6–10 units, 88%, massive, 89%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). An increased amount of donor blood transfusion did not affect rates of acute rejection (no-blood, 18% vs. 1–5 units, 19%, 6–10 units, 17%, massive, 19%, <i>p</i> = 0.13). The number of units transfused also did not affect 1-year survival rates. The Cox hazard model showed no effect of massive transfusion on mortality following transplant (no-blood, reference vs. 1–5 units; HR, 1.02 [<i>p</i> = 0.35], 6–10 units; HR, 1.10 [<i>p</i> = 0.01], massive transfusion; HR 1.04 [<i>p</i> = 0.3]).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Massive transfusion in donors was not associated with increased recipient mortality. Additionally, the amount of donor blood transfusion did not affect rejection rates following HT. The present study suggests that a history of donor blood transfusion, as well as the amount of transfusion, should not preclude donor heart utilization.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"38 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
There is a lack of evidence regarding the impact of donor blood transfusion on heart transplant (HT) outcomes. We sought to elucidate the influence of donor transfusion on HT outcomes using the national database.
Methods
From January 2004 to March 2023, donor transfusion information was available for 40 538 recipients for HT in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. We used the UNOS 4-level designation of transfusion (no blood [N = 18 575], 1–5 units [N = 14 098], 6–10 units [N = 4766], and massive transfusion of > 10 units [N = 3099]).
Results
Among this cohort, 53.2% of donors (N = 20 220) received a blood transfusion during the same admission. Donors who required blood transfusion commonly had head trauma as a cause of death (no-blood, 22% vs. 1–5 units, 61%, 6–10 units, 88%, massive, 89%, p < 0.001). An increased amount of donor blood transfusion did not affect rates of acute rejection (no-blood, 18% vs. 1–5 units, 19%, 6–10 units, 17%, massive, 19%, p = 0.13). The number of units transfused also did not affect 1-year survival rates. The Cox hazard model showed no effect of massive transfusion on mortality following transplant (no-blood, reference vs. 1–5 units; HR, 1.02 [p = 0.35], 6–10 units; HR, 1.10 [p = 0.01], massive transfusion; HR 1.04 [p = 0.3]).
Conclusions
Massive transfusion in donors was not associated with increased recipient mortality. Additionally, the amount of donor blood transfusion did not affect rejection rates following HT. The present study suggests that a history of donor blood transfusion, as well as the amount of transfusion, should not preclude donor heart utilization.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored.
Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include:
Immunology and immunosuppression;
Patient preparation;
Social, ethical, and psychological issues;
Complications, short- and long-term results;
Artificial organs;
Donation and preservation of organ and tissue;
Translational studies;
Advances in tissue typing;
Updates on transplant pathology;.
Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries.
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.