Is inertial training more effective than traditional resistance training in young healthy males?

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2024-11-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2024.1487624
Alicja Naczk, Katarzyna Kisiel-Sajewicz, Ewa Gajewska, Piotr Gramza, Tomasz Jędzrzejczak, Mariusz Naczk
{"title":"Is inertial training more effective than traditional resistance training in young healthy males?","authors":"Alicja Naczk, Katarzyna Kisiel-Sajewicz, Ewa Gajewska, Piotr Gramza, Tomasz Jędzrzejczak, Mariusz Naczk","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2024.1487624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Inertial training, also called flywheel training is more and more popular among sportsmen. The available data concerning the effectiveness of inertial training compared to conventional resistance strength training are contradictory. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of inertial training (IT) vs. traditional gravity-dependent resistance training (TRT) on elbow flexor and knee extensor strength.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six young, recreationally active males were randomized into IT group (n = 13) or TRT group (n = 13). Both groups performed strength training three times a week for 6 weeks. Before and after training, the maximum force of the trained muscles was evaluated under training conditions (one repetition maximum under gravity-dependent conditions and maximal force under inertial conditions) and isometric conditions. Countermovement jump, squat jump, pull-up test, and limb circumference were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Elbow flexor muscle strength and arm circumference increased significantly in both IT and TRT over the course of training. There were no significant differences in relative muscle strength increases between groups. Knee extensor muscle strength also improved significantly in IT, regardless of the tested conditions, while TRT showed significant changes in one repetition maximum and isometric force but no significant changes in force obtained under inertial conditions. Thigh circumference increased in IT (P ≤ 0.05) but was unchanged in TRT. Jumping abilities improved significantly in both groups, without any differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We cannot confirm the superiority of inertial training over traditional resistance training definitively. Nevertheless, inertial training had a slight advantage over traditional resistance training when knee extensor muscle training was considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1487624"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11625812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1487624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Inertial training, also called flywheel training is more and more popular among sportsmen. The available data concerning the effectiveness of inertial training compared to conventional resistance strength training are contradictory. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of inertial training (IT) vs. traditional gravity-dependent resistance training (TRT) on elbow flexor and knee extensor strength.

Methods: Twenty-six young, recreationally active males were randomized into IT group (n = 13) or TRT group (n = 13). Both groups performed strength training three times a week for 6 weeks. Before and after training, the maximum force of the trained muscles was evaluated under training conditions (one repetition maximum under gravity-dependent conditions and maximal force under inertial conditions) and isometric conditions. Countermovement jump, squat jump, pull-up test, and limb circumference were also evaluated.

Results: Elbow flexor muscle strength and arm circumference increased significantly in both IT and TRT over the course of training. There were no significant differences in relative muscle strength increases between groups. Knee extensor muscle strength also improved significantly in IT, regardless of the tested conditions, while TRT showed significant changes in one repetition maximum and isometric force but no significant changes in force obtained under inertial conditions. Thigh circumference increased in IT (P ≤ 0.05) but was unchanged in TRT. Jumping abilities improved significantly in both groups, without any differences between groups.

Conclusion: We cannot confirm the superiority of inertial training over traditional resistance training definitively. Nevertheless, inertial training had a slight advantage over traditional resistance training when knee extensor muscle training was considered.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在年轻健康男性中,惯性训练比传统阻力训练更有效吗?
目的:惯性训练,又称飞轮训练,越来越受到运动员的欢迎。关于惯性训练与常规阻力力量训练的有效性,现有的数据是矛盾的。本研究的目的是比较惯性训练(IT)与传统的重力依赖阻力训练(TRT)对肘关节屈肌和膝关节伸肌力量的影响。方法:将26名年轻、爱娱乐的男性随机分为IT组(n = 13)和TRT组(n = 13)。两组每周进行三次力量训练,持续6周。在训练前后,分别在训练条件下(重力依赖条件下的一次最大重复和惯性条件下的最大力量)和等长条件下评估训练肌肉的最大力量。并对反动作跳、深蹲跳、引体向上试验和肢体围度进行评价。结果:在IT和TRT训练过程中,肘关节屈肌力量和臂围明显增加。各组间相对肌力增加无显著差异。无论测试条件如何,在IT组中膝关节伸肌力量也有显著提高,而在TRT组中,单次重复最大值和等距力有显著变化,而在惯性条件下获得的力没有显著变化。IT组大腿围增大(P≤0.05),TRT组不变。两组的跳跃能力均有显著提高,组间无差异。结论:惯性训练优于传统的抗阻训练,尚不能确定。然而,当考虑到膝关节伸肌训练时,惯性训练比传统的阻力训练有轻微的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
期刊最新文献
A multimodal deep learning-based model for posture asymmetry recognition and sports injury risk prediction in adolescent table tennis athletes. Effects of a low-load multi-component training program with blood flow restriction versus the same program without blood flow restriction on muscle thickness and functional outcomes in physically inactive young adults: randomized controlled trial. Feasibility and physiological effects of a combined exercise and nutritional intervention in older adults with cancer under catabolic stress. Editorial: Lifetime achievements in avian physiology. The role of circadian rhythms in the pathogenesis of myopia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1