Hospital-based health technology assessment of a screening rapid test MTBI (GFAP and UCH-L1 blood biomarkers) for mild traumatic brain injury.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1017/S026646232400477X
Miriam Menacho Román, Jose Roberto Penedo Alonso, Audrey Morales Rodríguez, Inés Pecharromán de Las Heras, Agustina Vicente Bartulos, Ignacio Arribas Gómez, Nieves Plana Farrás
{"title":"Hospital-based health technology assessment of a screening rapid test MTBI (GFAP and UCH-L1 blood biomarkers) for mild traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Miriam Menacho Román, Jose Roberto Penedo Alonso, Audrey Morales Rodríguez, Inés Pecharromán de Las Heras, Agustina Vicente Bartulos, Ignacio Arribas Gómez, Nieves Plana Farrás","doi":"10.1017/S026646232400477X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The assessment of technology in hospital settings is a crucial step towards ensuring the delivery of efficient, effective, and safe healthcare.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study conducts a Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment to evaluate the efficacy of a screening rapid test for mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mild TBI) utilizing blood biomarkers, specifically Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) and Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1). The assessment focuses on the clinical utility and performance characteristics of the proposed rapid test within a hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The screening model was meticulously examined for its ability to accurately detect mild TBI, considering the sensitivity and specificity of GFAP and UCH-L1 as blood biomarkers. The study involved a thorough evaluation of the test's diagnostic accuracy, comparing its outcomes with established standards for mild TBI diagnosis.Results from the Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment highlight the potential of the GFAP and UCH-L1 blood biomarker-based rapid test as an efficient screening tool for mild TBI within a hospital environment. The evidence results show that the test is highly sensitive (91 percent to 100 percent) for the prediction of acute traumatic intracranial lesions, which helps rule out injury when the result is negative. When used within 12 hours of injury in adult patients with mild TBI, this test holds promise in reducing the utilization of CT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings contribute valuable insights into the feasibility and reliability of implementing this technology for timely and accurate identification of mild TBI, enhancing clinical decision making and patient care in hospital settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"e5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646232400477X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The assessment of technology in hospital settings is a crucial step towards ensuring the delivery of efficient, effective, and safe healthcare.

Objective: This study conducts a Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment to evaluate the efficacy of a screening rapid test for mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mild TBI) utilizing blood biomarkers, specifically Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) and Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1). The assessment focuses on the clinical utility and performance characteristics of the proposed rapid test within a hospital setting.

Methods: The screening model was meticulously examined for its ability to accurately detect mild TBI, considering the sensitivity and specificity of GFAP and UCH-L1 as blood biomarkers. The study involved a thorough evaluation of the test's diagnostic accuracy, comparing its outcomes with established standards for mild TBI diagnosis.Results from the Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment highlight the potential of the GFAP and UCH-L1 blood biomarker-based rapid test as an efficient screening tool for mild TBI within a hospital environment. The evidence results show that the test is highly sensitive (91 percent to 100 percent) for the prediction of acute traumatic intracranial lesions, which helps rule out injury when the result is negative. When used within 12 hours of injury in adult patients with mild TBI, this test holds promise in reducing the utilization of CT.

Conclusion: The findings contribute valuable insights into the feasibility and reliability of implementing this technology for timely and accurate identification of mild TBI, enhancing clinical decision making and patient care in hospital settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于医院的健康技术评估筛选快速测试mtbi (gfap和uch-l1血液生物标志物)对轻度创伤性脑损伤。
背景:对医院环境中的技术进行评估是确保提供高效、有效和安全医疗保健的关键一步。目的:本研究开展了一项基于医院的卫生技术评估,以评估利用血液生物标志物,特别是胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)和泛素c端水解酶L1 (UCH-L1)筛查轻度创伤性脑损伤(mild TBI)的快速试验的疗效。评估的重点是在医院环境中提出的快速检测的临床效用和性能特征。方法:考虑GFAP和UCH-L1作为血液生物标志物的敏感性和特异性,仔细检查筛选模型准确检测轻度TBI的能力。该研究包括对该测试的诊断准确性进行全面评估,并将其结果与轻度创伤性脑损伤诊断的既定标准进行比较。基于医院的卫生技术评估结果强调了GFAP和UCH-L1血液生物标志物快速检测作为医院环境中轻度TBI的有效筛查工具的潜力。证据结果表明,该测试对于预测急性创伤性颅内病变具有很高的敏感性(91%至100%),这有助于在结果为阴性时排除损伤。当在成人轻度脑外伤患者受伤后12小时内使用时,该测试有望减少CT的使用。结论:该研究结果为实施该技术的可行性和可靠性提供了有价值的见解,以及时准确地识别轻度TBI,提高临床决策和医院环境中的患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
期刊最新文献
A MINIMUM DATASET FOR DESTINATION THERAPY WITH LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE: THE EVIDENCE THAT MATTERS TO DECISION MAKERS. A decision-analytic method to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of remote monitoring technology for chronic depression. Development of a value assessment framework for Health Technology Assessment in rare diseases drugs: insights from a Delphi study in Brazil. Good Practices for Health Technology Assessment Guideline Development: A Report of the Health Technology Assessment International, HTAsiaLink, and ISPOR Special Task Force. How can actuarial science contribute to the field of health technology assessment? An interdisciplinary perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1