Comparison of suction technique and non-suction technique in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY International Urology and Nephrology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1007/s11255-024-04280-6
Pengan Chen, Gaoshen Mi, Jixiang Chen, Yu Liu, Zhongyu Jian, Xi Jin, Kunjie Wang
{"title":"Comparison of suction technique and non-suction technique in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Pengan Chen, Gaoshen Mi, Jixiang Chen, Yu Liu, Zhongyu Jian, Xi Jin, Kunjie Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11255-024-04280-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical efficacy of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery (RIRS) using the vacuum suction technique for the treatment of upper urinary calculi.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Sino Med, CNKI, WANFANG DATA, and Cochrane. We included studies comparing vacuum suction RIRS with non-vacuum RIRS. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we performed a meta-analysis of the selected studies. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control studies, and retrospective studies evaluating the efficacy of these techniques. Key outcomes analyzed included operative time, hospitalization duration, stone-free rates, and complication rates. Statistical analyses were conducted using mean differences (MD) for continuous variables and odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous outcomes, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies (6 RCTs, 1 case-control study, and 9 retrospective studies) involving a total of 2029 patients were included. Meta-analysis revealed that the vacuum suction technique significantly reduced operative time (MD = - 14.45 min, 95% CI [- 18.45; - 10.44], P < 0.00001) and hospital stay (MD = - 0.54 days, 95% CI [- 0.80; - 0.28], P < 0.00001). In addition, patients in the vacuum suction group had a higher stone-free rate (OR = 3.57, 95% CI [2.57; 4.95], P < 0.00001) and lower complication rates, particularly in reducing postoperative fever.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of the vacuum suction technique in RIRS significantly improves clinical outcomes by reducing operative time and hospitalization duration, enhancing stone-free rates, and lowering postoperative complication rates. This technique demonstrates a clear clinical advantage over non-vacuum RIRS and should be considered a preferred option for the management of upper urinary tract stones.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"1051-1062"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11903590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-04280-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery (RIRS) using the vacuum suction technique for the treatment of upper urinary calculi.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Sino Med, CNKI, WANFANG DATA, and Cochrane. We included studies comparing vacuum suction RIRS with non-vacuum RIRS. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we performed a meta-analysis of the selected studies. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control studies, and retrospective studies evaluating the efficacy of these techniques. Key outcomes analyzed included operative time, hospitalization duration, stone-free rates, and complication rates. Statistical analyses were conducted using mean differences (MD) for continuous variables and odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous outcomes, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Sixteen studies (6 RCTs, 1 case-control study, and 9 retrospective studies) involving a total of 2029 patients were included. Meta-analysis revealed that the vacuum suction technique significantly reduced operative time (MD = - 14.45 min, 95% CI [- 18.45; - 10.44], P < 0.00001) and hospital stay (MD = - 0.54 days, 95% CI [- 0.80; - 0.28], P < 0.00001). In addition, patients in the vacuum suction group had a higher stone-free rate (OR = 3.57, 95% CI [2.57; 4.95], P < 0.00001) and lower complication rates, particularly in reducing postoperative fever.

Conclusion: The application of the vacuum suction technique in RIRS significantly improves clinical outcomes by reducing operative time and hospitalization duration, enhancing stone-free rates, and lowering postoperative complication rates. This technique demonstrates a clear clinical advantage over non-vacuum RIRS and should be considered a preferred option for the management of upper urinary tract stones.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
逆行肾内结石手术中吸术与非吸术的比较:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:评价真空吸引逆行肾内结石手术治疗上尿路结石的临床疗效。方法:在PubMed、Embase、Sino Med、CNKI、万方数据、Cochrane等数据库中进行综合文献检索。我们纳入了比较真空吸入RIRS和非真空RIRS的研究。按照PRISMA指南,我们对选定的研究进行了荟萃分析。纳入标准为随机对照试验(rct)、病例对照研究和评价这些技术疗效的回顾性研究。分析的主要结果包括手术时间、住院时间、结石清除率和并发症发生率。采用连续变量的平均差异(MD)和二分类结果的优势比(OR)进行统计分析,并采用相应的95%置信区间(CI)。结果:共纳入16项研究(6项随机对照研究、1项病例对照研究和9项回顾性研究),共2029例患者。荟萃分析显示,真空吸痰技术可显著缩短手术时间(MD = - 14.45 min, 95% CI [- 18.45; - 10.44], P)。结论:真空吸痰技术在RIRS中的应用可减少手术时间和住院时间,提高结石清除率,降低术后并发症发生率,显著改善临床疗效。该技术与非真空RIRS相比具有明显的临床优势,应被视为治疗上尿路结石的首选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
International Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
329
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Early outcomes of concurrent MACE and Mitrofanoff procedures for management of neuropathic fecal and urinary incontinence in children. Al-Azhar experience. Radiomics as a tool for predicting biochemical recurrence after total prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Comparative efficacy of hyperthermic chemotherapy and BCG instillation in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Discordance between preoperative urine culture and intraoperative stone/pelvis culture as a predictor of post-PCNL sepsis: a single-center retrospective analysis for targeted antibiotic stewardship. Long-term trends in androgen-directed therapy in advanced prostate cancer: a 29-year national analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1