Dissemination and Implementation - A Primer for Accelerating "Time to Translation" in Radiation Oncology.

Patricia Mae G Santos, Sierra Silverwood, Gita Suneja, Eric Ford, Nikhil G Thaker, Jamie S Ostroff, Bryan J Weiner, Erin F Gillespie
{"title":"Dissemination and Implementation - A Primer for Accelerating \"Time to Translation\" in Radiation Oncology.","authors":"Patricia Mae G Santos, Sierra Silverwood, Gita Suneja, Eric Ford, Nikhil G Thaker, Jamie S Ostroff, Bryan J Weiner, Erin F Gillespie","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The field of radiation oncology has achieved significant technological and scientific advancements in the 21<sup>st</sup> century. Yet uptake of new evidence-based practices has been heterogeneous, even in the presence of national and international guidelines. Addressing barriers to practice change requires a deliberate focus on developing and testing strategies tailored to improving care delivery and quality, especially for vulnerable patient populations. Implementation science provides a systematic approach to developing and testing strategies, though applications in radiation oncology remain limited. In this critical review, we aim to 1) assess the time from first evidence to widespread adoption, or \"time to translation,\" across multiple evidence-based practices involving radiation therapy, and 2) provide a primer on the application of implementation science to radiation oncology. Specifically, we discuss potential targets for implementation research in radiation oncology, including both evidence-based practices and quality metrics, and highlight examples of studies evaluating implementation strategies. We also define key concepts and frameworks in the field of implementation science, review common study designs including hybrid trials and cluster randomization, and discuss the interaction with related disciplines such as quality improvement and behavioral economics. Ultimately, this review aims to illustrate how a comprehensive understanding of implementation science could be used to promote equity and quality in cancer care through the development of effective, scalable, and sustainable care delivery solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.101","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The field of radiation oncology has achieved significant technological and scientific advancements in the 21st century. Yet uptake of new evidence-based practices has been heterogeneous, even in the presence of national and international guidelines. Addressing barriers to practice change requires a deliberate focus on developing and testing strategies tailored to improving care delivery and quality, especially for vulnerable patient populations. Implementation science provides a systematic approach to developing and testing strategies, though applications in radiation oncology remain limited. In this critical review, we aim to 1) assess the time from first evidence to widespread adoption, or "time to translation," across multiple evidence-based practices involving radiation therapy, and 2) provide a primer on the application of implementation science to radiation oncology. Specifically, we discuss potential targets for implementation research in radiation oncology, including both evidence-based practices and quality metrics, and highlight examples of studies evaluating implementation strategies. We also define key concepts and frameworks in the field of implementation science, review common study designs including hybrid trials and cluster randomization, and discuss the interaction with related disciplines such as quality improvement and behavioral economics. Ultimately, this review aims to illustrate how a comprehensive understanding of implementation science could be used to promote equity and quality in cancer care through the development of effective, scalable, and sustainable care delivery solutions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辐射肿瘤学领域在 21 世纪取得了重大的技术和科学进步。然而,即使是在国家和国际指南的指导下,新的循证实践的采用情况也不尽相同。要解决实践变革的障碍,就必须有意识地关注制定和测试专门用于改善医疗服务和质量的策略,尤其是针对弱势患者群体。实施科学为制定和测试策略提供了系统的方法,但在放射肿瘤学中的应用仍然有限。在这篇关键性综述中,我们旨在:1)评估涉及放射治疗的多种循证实践从首次证据到广泛采用的时间,即 "转化时间";2)提供将实施科学应用于放射肿瘤学的入门指南。具体而言,我们讨论了放射肿瘤学实施研究的潜在目标,包括循证实践和质量指标,并重点介绍了评估实施策略的研究实例。我们还定义了实施科学领域的关键概念和框架,回顾了包括混合试验和分组随机化在内的常见研究设计,并讨论了与质量改进和行为经济学等相关学科的互动。最后,本综述旨在说明如何利用对实施科学的全面了解,通过开发有效、可扩展和可持续的医疗服务解决方案来促进癌症治疗的公平性和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
期刊最新文献
Conjunction Junction, Preserve the Function: Nonoperative Management of Head and Neck Rhabdomyosarcoma. Getting Cheeky With It: Adult Rhabdomyosarcoma. In Regard to Song et al. In Reply to Khor et al. Looking Forward and Looking Back: Cutting-Edge Advances and Long-Standing Controversies in Head and Neck Cancer Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1