Jeeyon G Rim, Jennifer G Jackman, Christoph P Hornik, Joni L Rutter, Haider Warraich, Janet Wittes, Lee Fleisher, Brian S Anderson, Ester Krofah, Elizabeth Kinter, Trevan Locke, Lindsay Kehoe, Ali Abbasi, Hilary Marston, Ann Meeker-O'Connell, Wendy Weber, Tracy Wang, Adrian F Hernandez, Martin Landray, Scott M Palmer
{"title":"Accelerating evidence generation: Addressing critical challenges and charting a path forward.","authors":"Jeeyon G Rim, Jennifer G Jackman, Christoph P Hornik, Joni L Rutter, Haider Warraich, Janet Wittes, Lee Fleisher, Brian S Anderson, Ester Krofah, Elizabeth Kinter, Trevan Locke, Lindsay Kehoe, Ali Abbasi, Hilary Marston, Ann Meeker-O'Connell, Wendy Weber, Tracy Wang, Adrian F Hernandez, Martin Landray, Scott M Palmer","doi":"10.1017/cts.2024.621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Efficient evidence generation to assess the clinical and economic impact of medical therapies is critical amid rising healthcare costs and aging populations. However, drug development and clinical trials remain far too expensive and inefficient for all stakeholders. On October 25-26, 2023, the Duke Clinical Research Institute brought together leaders from academia, industry, government agencies, patient advocacy, and nonprofit organizations to explore how different entities and influencers in drug development and healthcare can realign incentive structures to efficiently accelerate evidence generation that addresses the highest public health needs. Prominent themes surfaced, including competing research priorities and incentives, inadequate representation of patient population in clinical trials, opportunities to better leverage existing technology and infrastructure in trial design, and a need for heightened transparency and accountability in research practices. The group determined that together these elements contribute to an inefficient and costly clinical research enterprise, amplifying disparities in population health and sustaining gaps in evidence that impede advancements in equitable healthcare delivery and outcomes. The goal of addressing the identified challenges is to ultimately make clinical trials faster, more inclusive, and more efficient across diverse communities and settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"e184"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626582/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Efficient evidence generation to assess the clinical and economic impact of medical therapies is critical amid rising healthcare costs and aging populations. However, drug development and clinical trials remain far too expensive and inefficient for all stakeholders. On October 25-26, 2023, the Duke Clinical Research Institute brought together leaders from academia, industry, government agencies, patient advocacy, and nonprofit organizations to explore how different entities and influencers in drug development and healthcare can realign incentive structures to efficiently accelerate evidence generation that addresses the highest public health needs. Prominent themes surfaced, including competing research priorities and incentives, inadequate representation of patient population in clinical trials, opportunities to better leverage existing technology and infrastructure in trial design, and a need for heightened transparency and accountability in research practices. The group determined that together these elements contribute to an inefficient and costly clinical research enterprise, amplifying disparities in population health and sustaining gaps in evidence that impede advancements in equitable healthcare delivery and outcomes. The goal of addressing the identified challenges is to ultimately make clinical trials faster, more inclusive, and more efficient across diverse communities and settings.
在医疗成本上升和人口老龄化的背景下,有效的证据生成以评估医疗疗法的临床和经济影响至关重要。然而,对于所有利益相关者来说,药物开发和临床试验仍然过于昂贵和低效。2023年10月25日至26日,杜克临床研究所(Duke Clinical Research Institute)汇集了来自学术界、工业界、政府机构、患者倡导和非营利组织的领导人,探讨药物开发和医疗保健领域的不同实体和影响者如何重新调整激励结构,以有效地加速证据生成,从而满足最高的公共卫生需求。突出的主题浮出水面,包括相互竞争的研究重点和激励措施,临床试验中患者群体的代表性不足,在试验设计中更好地利用现有技术和基础设施的机会,以及在研究实践中提高透明度和问责制的必要性。该小组认为,这些因素加在一起,导致临床研究工作效率低下、成本高昂,扩大了人口健康方面的差距,并在证据方面持续存在差距,阻碍了公平医疗服务和结果的进步。解决已确定的挑战的目标是最终使临床试验在不同社区和环境中更快、更具包容性和更有效。