Advancing and strengthening the study of social networks in community-level dissemination and implementation research: A narrative review.

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2024-10-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2024.614
Ariella R Korn, Jennifer L Cruz, Natalie R Smith, Rebekah R Jacob, Megan Carney, Wallis Slater, Shoba Ramanadhan
{"title":"Advancing and strengthening the study of social networks in community-level dissemination and implementation research: A narrative review.","authors":"Ariella R Korn, Jennifer L Cruz, Natalie R Smith, Rebekah R Jacob, Megan Carney, Wallis Slater, Shoba Ramanadhan","doi":"10.1017/cts.2024.614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The dissemination and implementation (D&I) of evidence at the community level is critical to improve health and advance health equity. Social networks are considered essential to D&I efforts, but there lacks clarity regarding how best to study and leverage networks. We examined networks in community-level D&I frameworks to characterize the range of network actors, activities, and change approaches. We conducted a narrative review of 66 frameworks. Among frameworks that explicitly addressed networks - that is, elaborated on network characteristics, structure, and/or activities - we extracted and synthesized network concepts using descriptive statistics and narrative summaries. A total of 24 (36%) frameworks explicitly addressed networks. Commonly included actors were implementers, adopters/decision-makers, innovation developers, implementation support professionals, and innovation recipients. Network activities included the exchange of resources, knowledge, trust, and norms. Most network-explicit frameworks characterized ties within and across organizations and considered element(s) of network structure - for example, size, centrality, and density. The most common network change strategy was identifying individuals to champion D&I efforts. We discuss opportunities to expand network inquiry in D&I science, including understanding networks as implementation determinants, leveraging network change approaches as implementation strategies, and exploring network change as an implementation outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"e203"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626584/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The dissemination and implementation (D&I) of evidence at the community level is critical to improve health and advance health equity. Social networks are considered essential to D&I efforts, but there lacks clarity regarding how best to study and leverage networks. We examined networks in community-level D&I frameworks to characterize the range of network actors, activities, and change approaches. We conducted a narrative review of 66 frameworks. Among frameworks that explicitly addressed networks - that is, elaborated on network characteristics, structure, and/or activities - we extracted and synthesized network concepts using descriptive statistics and narrative summaries. A total of 24 (36%) frameworks explicitly addressed networks. Commonly included actors were implementers, adopters/decision-makers, innovation developers, implementation support professionals, and innovation recipients. Network activities included the exchange of resources, knowledge, trust, and norms. Most network-explicit frameworks characterized ties within and across organizations and considered element(s) of network structure - for example, size, centrality, and density. The most common network change strategy was identifying individuals to champion D&I efforts. We discuss opportunities to expand network inquiry in D&I science, including understanding networks as implementation determinants, leveraging network change approaches as implementation strategies, and exploring network change as an implementation outcome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推进和加强社区层面传播与实施研究中的社会网络研究:叙述性回顾。
在社区一级传播和实施证据对于改善健康和促进卫生公平至关重要。社交网络被认为是D&I工作的必要条件,但对于如何最好地研究和利用社交网络缺乏明确的认识。我们研究了社区级D&I框架中的网络,以表征网络参与者、活动和变化方法的范围。我们对66个框架进行了叙述性回顾。在明确处理网络的框架中——也就是说,详细阐述网络特征、结构和/或活动——我们使用描述性统计和叙述性总结提取和综合网络概念。总共有24个(36%)框架明确地解决了网络问题。通常包括的参与者是实现者、采用者/决策者、创新开发人员、实现支持专业人员和创新接受者。网络活动包括资源、知识、信任和规范的交换。大多数网络显式框架描述了组织内部和组织之间的联系,并考虑了网络结构的元素——例如,大小、中心性和密度。最常见的网络变更策略是确定个人来支持D&I工作。我们讨论了在D&I科学中扩展网络探究的机会,包括将网络理解为实施决定因素,利用网络变化方法作为实施策略,以及探索网络变化作为实施结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Health impacts of a remotely delivered prolonged nightly fasting intervention in stressed adults with memory decline and obesity: A nationwide randomized controlled pilot trial - ADDENDUM. Erratum: 489 Nasal-derived Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) carry a cargo of antiviral and immunomodulatory molecules - CORRIGENDUM. Local context review by single institutional review boards: Results from a modified Delphi process. Considerations and recommendations for collaborative research networks in epidemiology: Lessons learned from the diabetes LEAD Network. Training T-shaped translational scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1