Community Engagement Studios to advance multi-site research with older adults.

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2024-10-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2024.630
Meredith C Masel, Kerri L Cavanaugh, Sharon P Croisant, Krista Bohn, James S Goodwin, Martha L Bruce, Paul J Barr
{"title":"Community Engagement Studios to advance multi-site research with older adults.","authors":"Meredith C Masel, Kerri L Cavanaugh, Sharon P Croisant, Krista Bohn, James S Goodwin, Martha L Bruce, Paul J Barr","doi":"10.1017/cts.2024.630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Operationalizing multi-site Community Engagement (CE) Studios to inform a research program is valuable for researchers. We describe the process and outcomes of hosting three CE Studios with Community Experts aged 65 years or older with chronic conditions and care partners of older adults. Experts gave feedback about processes for testing the feasibility, efficacy, effectiveness, and implementation of audio recording clinic visits and sharing recordings with patients who have multimorbidity and their care partners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CE Cores of the Clinical and Translational Science Awards Programs at three academic health science centers created a joint CE Studio guide. Studios were conducted iteratively by site. Following receipt of the final reports, responses were compared to find themes, similarities, and differences on four topics in addition to overall commentary: Recruitment and Retention, Study Protocol, Study Reminders and Frequency, and Recording Technology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen older adults and care partners in three states provided valuable feedback to inform multi-site trials. Feedback influenced multiple aspects of trials in process or subsequently funded. Experts provided critique on the wording of study invitations, information sheets, and reminders to engage in study procedures. Experts were concerned for participants being disappointed by randomization to a control arm and advised how investigators should prepare to address that.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multi-site CE Studios should be consecutive, so each team can learn from the previous teams. Using the CES Toolkit ensures that final reports were easily comparable and utilized to develop a research program that now includes three federally funded clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"e186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Operationalizing multi-site Community Engagement (CE) Studios to inform a research program is valuable for researchers. We describe the process and outcomes of hosting three CE Studios with Community Experts aged 65 years or older with chronic conditions and care partners of older adults. Experts gave feedback about processes for testing the feasibility, efficacy, effectiveness, and implementation of audio recording clinic visits and sharing recordings with patients who have multimorbidity and their care partners.

Methods: The CE Cores of the Clinical and Translational Science Awards Programs at three academic health science centers created a joint CE Studio guide. Studios were conducted iteratively by site. Following receipt of the final reports, responses were compared to find themes, similarities, and differences on four topics in addition to overall commentary: Recruitment and Retention, Study Protocol, Study Reminders and Frequency, and Recording Technology.

Results: Eighteen older adults and care partners in three states provided valuable feedback to inform multi-site trials. Feedback influenced multiple aspects of trials in process or subsequently funded. Experts provided critique on the wording of study invitations, information sheets, and reminders to engage in study procedures. Experts were concerned for participants being disappointed by randomization to a control arm and advised how investigators should prepare to address that.

Conclusions: Multi-site CE Studios should be consecutive, so each team can learn from the previous teams. Using the CES Toolkit ensures that final reports were easily comparable and utilized to develop a research program that now includes three federally funded clinical trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区参与工作室推进老年人的多地点研究。
介绍:多站点社区参与(CE)工作室的运作对研究人员来说是有价值的。我们描述了举办三个CE工作室的过程和结果,这些工作室有65岁或65岁以上的慢性病社区专家和老年人的护理伙伴。专家们就测试可行性、疗效、有效性和实施录音门诊就诊以及与患有多种疾病的患者及其护理伙伴共享录音的过程提供了反馈。方法:三个学术卫生科学中心临床和转化科学奖励项目的CE核心创建了一个联合CE工作室指南。工作室是按场地进行迭代的。在收到最终报告后,除了总体评论外,还对回答进行了比较,以找出四个主题的主题、相似点和不同点:招募和保留、研究方案、学习提醒和频率以及记录技术。结果:三个州的18名老年人和护理伙伴提供了有价值的反馈,为多地点试验提供了信息。反馈影响了正在进行或随后资助的试验的多个方面。专家对研究邀请的措辞、信息表和参与研究程序的提醒提出了批评。专家们担心参与者对随机分配到对照组感到失望,并建议研究人员应该如何准备解决这个问题。结论:多地点CE工作室应该是连续的,这样每个团队都可以向之前的团队学习。使用CES工具包可确保最终报告易于比较,并用于开发研究项目,目前包括三个联邦资助的临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Using technology to increase reach and optimize consent experience for a large-scale research program. Evaluating translational science knowledge gains following an online short course for a general scientific audience. Health impacts of a remotely delivered prolonged nightly fasting intervention in stressed adults with memory decline and obesity: A nationwide randomized controlled pilot trial - ADDENDUM. The changing demographics and severity in hospitalized patients across COVID-19 variants: A national cohort study. A pilot randomized controlled trial of the iPeer2Peer program in adolescents with sickle cell disease: A mixed method study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1