Comparison between in situ fixation and fixation after closed reduction in valgus impacted femoral neck fractures: A Multicenter Study.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1097/BOT.0000000000002942
Byung-Woong Jang, Jung-Wee Park, Jae-Hwi Nho, Jinjae Kim, Tae-Young Kim, Young-Kyun Lee, Jin-Woo Kim
{"title":"Comparison between in situ fixation and fixation after closed reduction in valgus impacted femoral neck fractures: A Multicenter Study.","authors":"Byung-Woong Jang, Jung-Wee Park, Jae-Hwi Nho, Jinjae Kim, Tae-Young Kim, Young-Kyun Lee, Jin-Woo Kim","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between in situ fixation and fixation after closed reduction (CR) in patients aged 50 and above with valgus impacted femoral neck fractures using data from multiple centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Retrospective multicenter cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Five tertiary-care university hospitals.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Patients aged 50 and above, treated with operative fixation of valgus impacted femoral neck fractures using multiple cannulated screws from 2003 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Complications such as fixation failure, osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH), and reoperation were compared between the groups (in situ fixation group and fixation after CR group). Postoperative EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), Harris Hip Score (HHS), and Koval's grade were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the 206 patients (161 in situ fixation group, 45 in fixation after CR group) who met the inclusion criteria was 68.9 ± 10.9 years (range, 50 to 95 years). There were 39 men and 167 women. Fixation failure occurred in 11.2% (6.8% of in situ fixation group vs 26.7% of fixation after CR group, p = 0.002). Reoperation was required for 10.2% (7.5% of in situ fixation group vs 20% of fixation after CR group, p = 0.023). Fixation failure and reoperation rates were significantly higher in the fixation after CR group than in the in-situ fixation group (odds ratio = 4.757, p = 0.002 and odds ratio = 3.104, p = 0.023, respectively). At the two-year follow-up, ONFH occurred in 5.8% (9 out of 161, in situ fixation group vs 3 out of 45, fixation after CR group). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of ONFH between the two groups (p = 0.727). The Koval's grade at 6 and 12 months demonstrated better results in the in-situ group (p = 0.027, 0.044, respectively). Postoperative EQ-5D and HHS scores showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients aged 50 years or older with valgus impacted femoral neck fractures, when fixation was done after reduction, the reoperation rate was higher due to fixation failure compared to in-situ fixation. There was no significant difference in the incidence of ONFH in valgus impacted femoral neck fractures regardless of whether reduction was performed.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002942","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between in situ fixation and fixation after closed reduction (CR) in patients aged 50 and above with valgus impacted femoral neck fractures using data from multiple centers.

Methods: Design: Retrospective multicenter cohort study.

Setting: Five tertiary-care university hospitals.

Patient selection criteria: Patients aged 50 and above, treated with operative fixation of valgus impacted femoral neck fractures using multiple cannulated screws from 2003 to 2019.

Outcome measures and comparisons: Complications such as fixation failure, osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH), and reoperation were compared between the groups (in situ fixation group and fixation after CR group). Postoperative EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), Harris Hip Score (HHS), and Koval's grade were compared.

Results: The mean age of the 206 patients (161 in situ fixation group, 45 in fixation after CR group) who met the inclusion criteria was 68.9 ± 10.9 years (range, 50 to 95 years). There were 39 men and 167 women. Fixation failure occurred in 11.2% (6.8% of in situ fixation group vs 26.7% of fixation after CR group, p = 0.002). Reoperation was required for 10.2% (7.5% of in situ fixation group vs 20% of fixation after CR group, p = 0.023). Fixation failure and reoperation rates were significantly higher in the fixation after CR group than in the in-situ fixation group (odds ratio = 4.757, p = 0.002 and odds ratio = 3.104, p = 0.023, respectively). At the two-year follow-up, ONFH occurred in 5.8% (9 out of 161, in situ fixation group vs 3 out of 45, fixation after CR group). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of ONFH between the two groups (p = 0.727). The Koval's grade at 6 and 12 months demonstrated better results in the in-situ group (p = 0.027, 0.044, respectively). Postoperative EQ-5D and HHS scores showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusion: In patients aged 50 years or older with valgus impacted femoral neck fractures, when fixation was done after reduction, the reoperation rate was higher due to fixation failure compared to in-situ fixation. There was no significant difference in the incidence of ONFH in valgus impacted femoral neck fractures regardless of whether reduction was performed.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外翻冲击型股骨颈骨折闭式复位与原位固定的比较:一项多中心研究。
目的:本研究的目的是比较50岁及以上外翻影响型股骨颈骨折患者原位固定和闭合复位(CR)后固定的临床结果。方法:设计:回顾性多中心队列研究。环境:五所大学三级医院。患者选择标准:2003 - 2019年50岁及以上,行多枚空心螺钉手术固定外翻型股骨颈骨折患者。结果测量与比较:比较两组(原位固定组和CR后固定组)内固定失败、股骨头坏死(ONFH)、再手术等并发症。术后EuroQol-5维度(EQ-5D)、Harris髋关节评分(HHS)和Koval分级进行比较。结果:符合纳入标准的206例患者(原位固定组161例,CR后固定组45例)平均年龄为68.9±10.9岁(范围50 ~ 95岁)。其中男性39人,女性167人。11.2%的患者发生固定失败(原位固定组为6.8%,CR组为26.7%,p = 0.002)。10.2%的患者需要再次手术(原位固定组为7.5%,CR后固定组为20%,p = 0.023)。CR后固定组的固定失败率和再手术率明显高于原位固定组(优势比分别为4.757,p = 0.002和3.104,p = 0.023)。两年随访时,ONFH发生率为5.8%(原位固定组161例中有9例,CR后固定组45例中有3例)。两组间ONFH发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.727)。原位组在6个月和12个月时的Koval分级显示出更好的结果(p分别= 0.027,0.044)。两组术后EQ-5D、HHS评分差异无统计学意义。结论:50岁及以上外翻影响型股骨颈骨折患者复位后内固定,因内固定失败再手术率高于原位内固定。无论是否复位,外翻影响股骨颈骨折的ONFH发生率无显著差异。证据等级:治疗性III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
The Rapid Escalation of Fractures and Hospital Admissions from Electric Bicycle Injuries in the United States: An Analysis of National Injury Data from 2019 to 2023. Inability to Remove Locking Screws From the Femoral Neck System Due to Stripping of the Screwdriver Within the Locking Screw Head. Hardware Removal After Lisfranc Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Results in Improved Physical Function. Cast-OFF 2: One Week Versus 3-5 Weeks of Plaster Cast Immobilization for Non- or Minimally Displaced Distal Radius Fractures-A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. The Use of External Beam Radiation Therapy for Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis After Surgical Fixation of Acetabular Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1