Comparison of two approaches to quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia in radical cystectomy: a randomized clinical trial.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Minerva anestesiologica Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18332-0
Ghada M Aboelfadl, Abdelraheem M Elawamy, Ahmed H Othman, Hassan M Abdelbaky, Ahmed M Aboelfadl, Marwa M Abdelrady
{"title":"Comparison of two approaches to quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia in radical cystectomy: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Ghada M Aboelfadl, Abdelraheem M Elawamy, Ahmed H Othman, Hassan M Abdelbaky, Ahmed M Aboelfadl, Marwa M Abdelrady","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18332-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effects following radical cystectomy using two ultrasound guided QLB techniques: anterior and intramuscular.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty patients aged 40-60 years old with ASA I, II were considered for this study. They were divided into two equal groups. Bilateral ultrasound guided QLB was performed via either the anterior (QLBa) or intramuscular (QLBi) approach with 2.5 mg/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine diluted to 20 mL of normal saline after surgery. The primary outcome was the time to the first request for analgesia, while the secondary outcomes were the dose of postoperative morphine consumption, numerical rating scale (NRS) at rest and on movement, Bromage Scale, adverse events, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean time to first request for analgesia was significantly prolonged in group QLBa (14.7±1.33 hours) compared to group QLBi (9.8±0.72 hours) (P<0.001). NRS either at rest or on movement were not statistically significant until 6 hours postoperatively. At 10, 12, and 14 h, Group QLBi had a significantly higher NRS Score at rest and on movement (P<0.001). Group QLBa had a significantly lower total morphine consumption (5.37±0.49 mg) compared to Group QLBi (6.4±0.77 mg) (P<0.001). The QLBa had higher patient satisfaction than the QLBi.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with QLBi, bilateral ultrasound guided QLBa provided a longer time to the first analgesic request, less postoperative opioid consumption, lower NRS at rest and on movement, and higher patients' satisfaction after radical cystectomy under general anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva anestesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18332-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effects following radical cystectomy using two ultrasound guided QLB techniques: anterior and intramuscular.

Methods: Sixty patients aged 40-60 years old with ASA I, II were considered for this study. They were divided into two equal groups. Bilateral ultrasound guided QLB was performed via either the anterior (QLBa) or intramuscular (QLBi) approach with 2.5 mg/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine diluted to 20 mL of normal saline after surgery. The primary outcome was the time to the first request for analgesia, while the secondary outcomes were the dose of postoperative morphine consumption, numerical rating scale (NRS) at rest and on movement, Bromage Scale, adverse events, and patient satisfaction.

Results: The mean time to first request for analgesia was significantly prolonged in group QLBa (14.7±1.33 hours) compared to group QLBi (9.8±0.72 hours) (P<0.001). NRS either at rest or on movement were not statistically significant until 6 hours postoperatively. At 10, 12, and 14 h, Group QLBi had a significantly higher NRS Score at rest and on movement (P<0.001). Group QLBa had a significantly lower total morphine consumption (5.37±0.49 mg) compared to Group QLBi (6.4±0.77 mg) (P<0.001). The QLBa had higher patient satisfaction than the QLBi.

Conclusions: Compared with QLBi, bilateral ultrasound guided QLBa provided a longer time to the first analgesic request, less postoperative opioid consumption, lower NRS at rest and on movement, and higher patients' satisfaction after radical cystectomy under general anesthesia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva anestesiologica
Minerva anestesiologica 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Anestesiologica is the journal of the Italian National Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care. Minerva Anestesiologica publishes scientific papers on Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Analgesia, Perioperative Medicine and related fields. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
期刊最新文献
Modified thoracoabdominal nerves block through perichondrial approach block for pediatric kidney transplantation. A randomized clinical trial comparing different combination of peripheral nerve blocks for intraoperative analgesia in patients on antithrombotic drugs undergoing hip fracture surgery: pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus femoral and obturator nerve block. Awake veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: practical aspects and considerations. Clinical application and progress in preoxygenation techniques. Comparison of two approaches to quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia in radical cystectomy: a randomized clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1