Development of flexibility in primary school students.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.23736/S0022-4707.24.15971-3
Georgiy Polevoy, Ibrahim Ouergui, Luca P Ardigò
{"title":"Development of flexibility in primary school students.","authors":"Georgiy Polevoy, Ibrahim Ouergui, Luca P Ardigò","doi":"10.23736/S0022-4707.24.15971-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The flexibility development issue has not been studied well enough. Still, the problem can be partially solved in physical education lessons in a secondary school if a set of simple exercises for flexibility development is permanently added to the standard physical education (PE) program. The study aimed to increase flexibility in children aged 9-10 years in PE lessons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research was conducted in secondary school number 40 (Kirov, Russia). The study involved 56 children from 3<sup>rd</sup> grade. Students were split into 2 groups of 28 children each. School children in each group were engaged in PE according to the school schedule 3 times a week for 40 minutes. The control group (CG) was engaged in the usual program and the children from the experimental group (EG) in the preparatory and final part of the lesson performed special sets of physical exercises to develop flexibility. To match the training volume, CG prolonged the usual program accordingly. The research used tests that determined mobility in the hip joint (forward tilt), the flexibility of the spine (exercise \"bridge\") and mobility in the shoulder joint (exercise \"boat\").</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For forward tilt performance, there was a significant difference in poststudy with EG resulting in higher performance than CG. Regarding post-to-pre research, EG and CG showed a significant difference with better values post compared with preintervention. Regarding the bridge test, a significant difference between groups was found regarding delta change with better performance for EG than CG. For post-to-preintervention comparisons, both EG and CG showed a significant difference with better values at post compared with prestudy. Concerning the boat test, EG resulted in higher performance than CG postintervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>If a set of physical exercises is introduced in PE classes to develop flexibility in schoolchildren aged 9-10, then their indicators will significantly improve.</p>","PeriodicalId":17013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","volume":" ","pages":"306-311"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.24.15971-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The flexibility development issue has not been studied well enough. Still, the problem can be partially solved in physical education lessons in a secondary school if a set of simple exercises for flexibility development is permanently added to the standard physical education (PE) program. The study aimed to increase flexibility in children aged 9-10 years in PE lessons.

Methods: The research was conducted in secondary school number 40 (Kirov, Russia). The study involved 56 children from 3rd grade. Students were split into 2 groups of 28 children each. School children in each group were engaged in PE according to the school schedule 3 times a week for 40 minutes. The control group (CG) was engaged in the usual program and the children from the experimental group (EG) in the preparatory and final part of the lesson performed special sets of physical exercises to develop flexibility. To match the training volume, CG prolonged the usual program accordingly. The research used tests that determined mobility in the hip joint (forward tilt), the flexibility of the spine (exercise "bridge") and mobility in the shoulder joint (exercise "boat").

Results: For forward tilt performance, there was a significant difference in poststudy with EG resulting in higher performance than CG. Regarding post-to-pre research, EG and CG showed a significant difference with better values post compared with preintervention. Regarding the bridge test, a significant difference between groups was found regarding delta change with better performance for EG than CG. For post-to-preintervention comparisons, both EG and CG showed a significant difference with better values at post compared with prestudy. Concerning the boat test, EG resulted in higher performance than CG postintervention.

Conclusions: If a set of physical exercises is introduced in PE classes to develop flexibility in schoolchildren aged 9-10, then their indicators will significantly improve.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
培养小学生的灵活性。
背景:对柔韧性发展问题的研究还不够深入。尽管如此,如果在中学体育课上长期加入一套简单的柔韧性发展练习,这个问题还是可以得到部分解决。本研究旨在提高 9-10 岁儿童在体育课上的柔韧性:研究在第 40 中学(俄罗斯基洛夫)进行。研究涉及 56 名三年级学生。学生被分成两组,每组 28 人。每组学生按照学校安排上体育课,每周 3 次,每次 40 分钟。对照组(CG)参加常规课程,而实验组(EG)的孩子则在课前和课后进行专门的成套体育锻炼,以发展柔韧性。为了配合训练量,CG 相应地延长了常规项目的时间。研究采用的测试包括髋关节的活动度(前倾)、脊柱的灵活性("桥 "练习)和肩关节的活动度("船 "练习):结果:在前倾表现方面,EG 的表现高于 CG,这在研究后有显著差异。在干预后与干预前的对比研究中,EG 和 CG 显示出显著差异,干预后的数值高于干预前的数值。在桥接测试方面,各组之间在 delta 变化方面存在显著差异,EG 的表现优于 CG。在干预后与干预前的比较中,EG 和 CG 均显示出显著差异,干预后的数值优于干预前的数值。关于划船测试,干预后 EG 的成绩高于 CG:结论:如果在体育课中引入一套体育锻炼来培养 9-10 岁学龄儿童的柔韧性,那么他们的各项指标都将得到明显改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
393
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness publishes scientific papers relating to the area of the applied physiology, preventive medicine, sports medicine and traumatology, sports psychology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines.
期刊最新文献
An intermittent recovery test for soccer players: a validation study. Differences in throwing kinematics due to changes in run-up speed in javelin throwing. Cut-off values for estimated cardiorespiratory fitness in terms of physical functioning among middle-aged to older adults. Factor analysis on the performance of elite male fencing athletes. Shoulder injury patterns and trends in the national football league: an epidemiological analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1