The influence of photobiomodulation on upper body muscular performance in collegiate athletes.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.23736/S0022-4707.24.16418-3
Anthony D'Amico, Charla Bouranis, Kevin Silva, Katelyn Nicolay, Joseph Gallo
{"title":"The influence of photobiomodulation on upper body muscular performance in collegiate athletes.","authors":"Anthony D'Amico, Charla Bouranis, Kevin Silva, Katelyn Nicolay, Joseph Gallo","doi":"10.23736/S0022-4707.24.16418-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Photobiomodulation (PBM), has been shown to improve muscular performance during single-joint resistance exercises. It is unclear whether this benefit extends to multiple-joint exercises, such as the barbell bench press.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a within-group design, 15 collegiate athletes (mean±SD; age 20.2±1.6 yrs; BMI 26.0±4.5 kg<sup>.</sup>m<sup>-2</sup>) received PBM or sham treatment six hours prior and then immediately preceding a bench press protocol. Two treatment sites each on the pectoralis major, triceps, and deltoids were irradiated. Bench press one repetition maximum (1RM), volume load (VL) lifted during five sets to failure at 60% 1RM, and muscular soreness were compared between PBM and sham conditions. Testing was conducted over three sessions separated by a week each, with a baseline testing day occurring first, and the PBM and sham condition testing days following in a counterbalanced fashion. A repeated measures ANOVA was applied for analysis (alpha level=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed between PBM and sham conditions for bench press 1RM or soreness (P≥0.05). VL was greater in both PBM and sham conditions compared to baseline (P≤0.05). VL was not significantly different between PBM and sham.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that muscular performance during multi-joint resistance exercises such as the bench press may not benefit from PBM in the same fashion as single-joint resistance exercises.</p>","PeriodicalId":17013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","volume":" ","pages":"354-360"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.24.16418-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Photobiomodulation (PBM), has been shown to improve muscular performance during single-joint resistance exercises. It is unclear whether this benefit extends to multiple-joint exercises, such as the barbell bench press.

Methods: In a within-group design, 15 collegiate athletes (mean±SD; age 20.2±1.6 yrs; BMI 26.0±4.5 kg.m-2) received PBM or sham treatment six hours prior and then immediately preceding a bench press protocol. Two treatment sites each on the pectoralis major, triceps, and deltoids were irradiated. Bench press one repetition maximum (1RM), volume load (VL) lifted during five sets to failure at 60% 1RM, and muscular soreness were compared between PBM and sham conditions. Testing was conducted over three sessions separated by a week each, with a baseline testing day occurring first, and the PBM and sham condition testing days following in a counterbalanced fashion. A repeated measures ANOVA was applied for analysis (alpha level=0.05).

Results: No significant differences were observed between PBM and sham conditions for bench press 1RM or soreness (P≥0.05). VL was greater in both PBM and sham conditions compared to baseline (P≤0.05). VL was not significantly different between PBM and sham.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that muscular performance during multi-joint resistance exercises such as the bench press may not benefit from PBM in the same fashion as single-joint resistance exercises.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
光生物调制对大学生运动员上半身肌肉表现的影响。
背景:光生物调节(PBM)已被证明可以改善单关节阻力运动中的肌肉表现。目前还不清楚这种益处是否也适用于多关节锻炼,比如杠铃卧推。方法:采用组内设计,选取15名大学生运动员(mean±SD;年龄20.2±1.6岁;体重指数(26.0±4.5 kg.m-2)在接受PBM或假治疗前6小时,然后立即进行卧推治疗。照射胸大肌、肱三头肌和三角肌各两个治疗部位。卧推一次最大重复(1RM),体积负荷(VL)在五组中提升到60%的1RM失败,肌肉酸痛在PBM和假条件下进行比较。测试分三个阶段进行,每个阶段间隔一周,首先进行基线测试,然后以平衡的方式进行PBM和假条件测试。采用重复测量方差分析(α水平=0.05)。结果:PBM与假手术组在卧推1RM和酸痛方面无显著差异(P≥0.05)。与基线相比,PBM组和假手术组的VL都更高(P≤0.05)。VL在PBM和sham之间无显著差异。结论:这些发现表明,多关节阻力练习(如卧推)中的肌肉表现可能不会像单关节阻力练习那样受益于PBM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
393
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness publishes scientific papers relating to the area of the applied physiology, preventive medicine, sports medicine and traumatology, sports psychology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of blood flow restriction training in upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders: a meta-analysis. Plyometric training enhances jump, sprint, and agility performance across different surface types: a systematic review and meta-analysis. A 45-year global systematic evaluation of musculoskeletal injuries in swimmers: a systematic review and meta-analysis with 10973 athletes. Does the asymmetry in the boat make sweep rowers less symmetric in the gym? A case study of how rowers sit on the rowing ergometer. Comparing the effects of static and variable loading in potentiation of the lower extremities through vertical jump.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1