Impact of levetiracetam use in glioblastoma: an individual patient-level meta-analysis assessing overall survival.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgical Review Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1007/s10143-024-03137-x
Martin Vychopen, Agi Güresir, Alim Emre Basaran, Erdem Güresir, Johannes Wach
{"title":"Impact of levetiracetam use in glioblastoma: an individual patient-level meta-analysis assessing overall survival.","authors":"Martin Vychopen, Agi Güresir, Alim Emre Basaran, Erdem Güresir, Johannes Wach","doi":"10.1007/s10143-024-03137-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Levetiracetam (Lev), an antiepileptic drug (AED), enhances alkylating chemotherapy sensitivity in glioblastoma (GB) by inhibiting MGMT expression. This meta-analysis evaluates Lev's impact on GB treatment by analyzing overall survival of individual patient data (IPD) from published studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IPD was reconstructed using the R package IPDfromKM. Pooled IPD Kaplan-Meier charts of survival stratified by Lev therapy were created using the R package Survminer. One- and two-stage meta-analyses of Lev treatment regarding survival was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three articles covering 825 patients were included out of 3567 screened records. Lev usage prevalence was 0.36. IPD from 590 IDH wild-type glioblastomas, with a median follow-up of 16.1 months, were utilized. Pooled data revealed median survival times of 19.2 months (95%CI: 16.4-22.0) for Lev users versus 16.5 months (95%CI: 15.2-17.8) for partial/no use (p = 0.006). One-stage meta-analysis indicated a significant association between Lev use and survival in IDH wild-type GB (HR: 1.33, 95%CI: 1.08-1.64, p = 0.007). Two-stage meta-analysis confirmed these results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis highlights that Lev use may prolong survival in IDH wild-type GB patients. Further randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings and identify subgroups benefiting most from Lev treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"897"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11628436/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-03137-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Levetiracetam (Lev), an antiepileptic drug (AED), enhances alkylating chemotherapy sensitivity in glioblastoma (GB) by inhibiting MGMT expression. This meta-analysis evaluates Lev's impact on GB treatment by analyzing overall survival of individual patient data (IPD) from published studies.

Methods: IPD was reconstructed using the R package IPDfromKM. Pooled IPD Kaplan-Meier charts of survival stratified by Lev therapy were created using the R package Survminer. One- and two-stage meta-analyses of Lev treatment regarding survival was performed.

Results: Three articles covering 825 patients were included out of 3567 screened records. Lev usage prevalence was 0.36. IPD from 590 IDH wild-type glioblastomas, with a median follow-up of 16.1 months, were utilized. Pooled data revealed median survival times of 19.2 months (95%CI: 16.4-22.0) for Lev users versus 16.5 months (95%CI: 15.2-17.8) for partial/no use (p = 0.006). One-stage meta-analysis indicated a significant association between Lev use and survival in IDH wild-type GB (HR: 1.33, 95%CI: 1.08-1.64, p = 0.007). Two-stage meta-analysis confirmed these results.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis highlights that Lev use may prolong survival in IDH wild-type GB patients. Further randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings and identify subgroups benefiting most from Lev treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左乙拉西坦对胶质母细胞瘤的影响:一项评估总生存率的个体患者水平荟萃分析。
背景:左乙莱西坦(Lev)是一种抗癫痫药物(AED),通过抑制MGMT表达增强胶质母细胞瘤(GB)的烷基化化疗敏感性。本荟萃分析通过分析已发表研究的个体患者总生存率(IPD)来评估Lev对GB治疗的影响。方法:利用km的R包ipd重建IPD。使用R包Survminer创建Lev治疗分层的IPD Kaplan-Meier生存图。对Lev治疗的生存率进行了一阶段和两阶段的荟萃分析。结果:在3567份筛选记录中纳入了3篇文章,涵盖825例患者。Lev使用率为0.36。使用了590例IDH野生型胶质母细胞瘤的IPD,中位随访时间为16.1个月。汇总数据显示,Lev使用者的中位生存时间为19.2个月(95%CI: 16.4-22.0),而部分/不使用Lev者的中位生存时间为16.5个月(95%CI: 15.2-17.8) (p = 0.006)。单阶段荟萃分析显示,在IDH野生型GB患者中,Lev的使用与生存之间存在显著相关性(HR: 1.33, 95%CI: 1.08-1.64, p = 0.007)。两阶段荟萃分析证实了这些结果。结论:本荟萃分析强调,Lev可延长IDH野生型GB患者的生存期。需要进一步的随机试验来证实这些发现,并确定从Lev治疗中获益最多的亚组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
From microvascular decompression to radiosurgery: a network meta-analysis of interventions for medication-refractory trigeminal neuralgia. Venous and paradoxical air embolism in seated neurosurgery with patent foramen ovale: a systematic review. Handmade external ventricular drainage in resource-limited settings: safety, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness from a Peruvian cohort and global evidence review. Determining the optimal management of geriatric type II odontoid fractures: a comparative network meta-analysis. Shifting the paradigm in intracranial aneurysm detection with deep learning: A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis and meta-regression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1