Reported foodservice environmental sustainability practices in Australian healthcare and aged care services pre and post the onset of COVID-19.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition & Dietetics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1111/1747-0080.12916
K MacKenzie-Shalders, J Higgs, D Cruickshank, X Tang, J Collins
{"title":"Reported foodservice environmental sustainability practices in Australian healthcare and aged care services pre and post the onset of COVID-19.","authors":"K MacKenzie-Shalders, J Higgs, D Cruickshank, X Tang, J Collins","doi":"10.1111/1747-0080.12916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Healthcare foodservices substantially impact global environmental changes. This study investigated environmentally sustainable practices in Australian health foodservices; and perceptions of the influence of COVID-19 on foodservice environmental sustainability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational study was undertaken collecting data at two time points (2019 and 2022) via a pre-workshop survey with healthcare foodservice stakeholders. The survey used rating scales and free text options to explore sustainable practices, perceived barriers and enablers to sustainable practices, and a free-text response on the impact of COVID-19. Analysis included independent samples t-tests (continuous, normally distributed), Mann-Whitney U tests (continuous non-normally distributed data), and Pearson chi-squared tests (categorical data). A qualitative analysis of free text responses to a single question about the impact of COVID-19 was used to identify, analyse, and report positive and negative aspects of COVID-19 for sustainable foodservice practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographic and employment characteristics were similar between timepoints n = 37 (2019) and n = 30 (2022), except for number who had attended sustainability training (n = 14, 38.8% vs n = 19, 63.3%; p = 0.038). There were fewer private hospital (n = 6, 16.2% vs n = 0), (0%) and more rural site representation in 2022 (n = 2, 5.4% vs n = 13, 43.3%; p <0.001). Sustainable foodservice practices were consistent across timepoints (overall mean (SD) sum score for sustainable practices 63.3 (20.7) vs 61.3 (20.4); p = 0.715), with recycling cardboard (n = 27, 90.0% vs n = 22, 84.6%), and the use of reusable cutlery (n = 26, 86.7% vs n = 22, 84.6%) the most prevalent practices at both timepoints. A 'lack of equipment' was the primary reported barrier while passionate staff (\"champions\") was the primary reported enabler. Participants reported that the COVID-19 pandemic led to an increase in single-use disposable items.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study describes negligible changes in reported environmental sustainability practices by Australian healthcare foodservice stakeholders from 2019 to 2022. The study provides useful information on sustainability beliefs and practices in healthcare foodservices.</p>","PeriodicalId":19368,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":"104-114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12916","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Healthcare foodservices substantially impact global environmental changes. This study investigated environmentally sustainable practices in Australian health foodservices; and perceptions of the influence of COVID-19 on foodservice environmental sustainability.

Methods: An observational study was undertaken collecting data at two time points (2019 and 2022) via a pre-workshop survey with healthcare foodservice stakeholders. The survey used rating scales and free text options to explore sustainable practices, perceived barriers and enablers to sustainable practices, and a free-text response on the impact of COVID-19. Analysis included independent samples t-tests (continuous, normally distributed), Mann-Whitney U tests (continuous non-normally distributed data), and Pearson chi-squared tests (categorical data). A qualitative analysis of free text responses to a single question about the impact of COVID-19 was used to identify, analyse, and report positive and negative aspects of COVID-19 for sustainable foodservice practices.

Results: Demographic and employment characteristics were similar between timepoints n = 37 (2019) and n = 30 (2022), except for number who had attended sustainability training (n = 14, 38.8% vs n = 19, 63.3%; p = 0.038). There were fewer private hospital (n = 6, 16.2% vs n = 0), (0%) and more rural site representation in 2022 (n = 2, 5.4% vs n = 13, 43.3%; p <0.001). Sustainable foodservice practices were consistent across timepoints (overall mean (SD) sum score for sustainable practices 63.3 (20.7) vs 61.3 (20.4); p = 0.715), with recycling cardboard (n = 27, 90.0% vs n = 22, 84.6%), and the use of reusable cutlery (n = 26, 86.7% vs n = 22, 84.6%) the most prevalent practices at both timepoints. A 'lack of equipment' was the primary reported barrier while passionate staff ("champions") was the primary reported enabler. Participants reported that the COVID-19 pandemic led to an increase in single-use disposable items.

Conclusions: This study describes negligible changes in reported environmental sustainability practices by Australian healthcare foodservice stakeholders from 2019 to 2022. The study provides useful information on sustainability beliefs and practices in healthcare foodservices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
报告了澳大利亚医疗保健和老年护理服务在COVID-19发病前后的食品服务环境可持续性实践。
目的:保健食品服务对全球环境变化产生重大影响。本研究调查了澳大利亚保健食品服务的环境可持续做法;以及对2019冠状病毒病对餐饮服务环境可持续性影响的看法。方法:通过对医疗餐饮服务利益相关者的研讨会前调查,在两个时间点(2019年和2022年)进行观察性研究。该调查使用评分量表和免费文本选项来探索可持续实践、可持续实践的感知障碍和推动因素,以及对COVID-19影响的免费文本回应。分析包括独立样本t检验(连续、正态分布)、Mann-Whitney U检验(连续、非正态分布数据)和Pearson卡方检验(分类数据)。通过对有关COVID-19影响的单一问题的免费文本回复进行定性分析,确定、分析和报告COVID-19对可持续餐饮服务实践的积极和消极影响。结果:人口统计学和就业特征在时间点n = 37(2019)和n = 30(2022)之间相似,除了参加可持续发展培训的人数(n = 14, 38.8% vs n = 19, 63.3%;p = 0.038)。2022年私立医院数量减少(n = 6, 16.2% vs n = 0),农村医院数量增加(n = 2, 5.4% vs n = 13, 43.3%);p结论:本研究描述了2019年至2022年澳大利亚医疗保健餐饮服务利益相关者报告的环境可持续性实践的可忽略不计的变化。该研究为保健食品服务的可持续性信念和实践提供了有用的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition & Dietetics
Nutrition & Dietetics 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition & Dietetics is the official journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia. Covering all aspects of food, nutrition and dietetics, the Journal provides a forum for the reporting, discussion and development of scientifically credible knowledge related to human nutrition and dietetics. Widely respected in Australia and around the world, Nutrition & Dietetics publishes original research, methodology analyses, research reviews and much more. The Journal aims to keep health professionals abreast of current knowledge on human nutrition and diet, and accepts contributions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Investigating the nutritional quality of charitable ready meals for people experiencing food insecurity-An Australian case study. Public health interventions targeted at discretionary food portion control: A qualitative study from consumers' perspectives. Global parent perspectives on school food service internationally: A mixed papers narrative review. Navigating challenges and adherence in time-restricted eating: A qualitative study. Extent of alignment between the Australian Dietary Guidelines and the NOVA classification system across the Australian packaged food supply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1