A bivariate reference interval for TSH and free thyroxine.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1080/00365513.2024.2437613
Arne Åsberg, Gustav Mikkelsen
{"title":"A bivariate reference interval for TSH and free thyroxine.","authors":"Arne Åsberg, Gustav Mikkelsen","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2024.2437613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Frequently, the serum concentrations of TSH (s-TSH) and free thyroxine (s-FT4) are interpreted together when a physician considers the patient's thyroid status. Then, each measurement is compared with its univariate reference interval. However, a pair of s-TSH and s-FT4 may be more appropriately assessed if compared with a <i>bivariate</i> reference interval. We constructed a bivariate reference interval for s-TSH and s-FT4 from their measurements in 495 healthy blood donors. After Box-Cox transformation, we estimated the Mahalanobis distances from each pair of s-TSH and s-FT4 to the center of the bivariate distribution. The 95 percentile in the distribution of the Mahalanobis distances was defined as the limit of the bivariate reference interval. Univariate reference intervals comprising the central 95% (2.5-97.5 percentile) and 97.5% (1.25-98.75 percentile) of reference values were estimated from the same data. Normal thyroid function was defined as both s-TSH and s-FT4 within their respective univariate reference intervals, or as a Mahalanobis distance within the 95% bivariate reference interval. In 177,514 specimens from adult individuals in out-patient care, 76.6% were classified as bivariate normal. The corresponding figures for the 95% and 97.5% univariate reference intervals were 68.9% and 76.2%, respectively. The kappa statistics for classification agreement between the bivariate 95% reference interval and the 95% and 97.5% univariate reference intervals were 0.790 and 0.881, respectively. We thought the bivariate reference interval to be clinically most accurate but were unable to prove it.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"521-526"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2024.2437613","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Frequently, the serum concentrations of TSH (s-TSH) and free thyroxine (s-FT4) are interpreted together when a physician considers the patient's thyroid status. Then, each measurement is compared with its univariate reference interval. However, a pair of s-TSH and s-FT4 may be more appropriately assessed if compared with a bivariate reference interval. We constructed a bivariate reference interval for s-TSH and s-FT4 from their measurements in 495 healthy blood donors. After Box-Cox transformation, we estimated the Mahalanobis distances from each pair of s-TSH and s-FT4 to the center of the bivariate distribution. The 95 percentile in the distribution of the Mahalanobis distances was defined as the limit of the bivariate reference interval. Univariate reference intervals comprising the central 95% (2.5-97.5 percentile) and 97.5% (1.25-98.75 percentile) of reference values were estimated from the same data. Normal thyroid function was defined as both s-TSH and s-FT4 within their respective univariate reference intervals, or as a Mahalanobis distance within the 95% bivariate reference interval. In 177,514 specimens from adult individuals in out-patient care, 76.6% were classified as bivariate normal. The corresponding figures for the 95% and 97.5% univariate reference intervals were 68.9% and 76.2%, respectively. The kappa statistics for classification agreement between the bivariate 95% reference interval and the 95% and 97.5% univariate reference intervals were 0.790 and 0.881, respectively. We thought the bivariate reference interval to be clinically most accurate but were unable to prove it.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促甲状腺激素和游离甲状腺素的双变量参考区间。
通常,当医生考虑患者的甲状腺状态时,血清TSH (s-TSH)和游离甲状腺素(s-FT4)的浓度被一起解释。然后,将每个测量值与其单变量参考区间进行比较。然而,如果与双变量参考区间相比,一对s-TSH和s-FT4可能更适合评估。我们根据495名健康献血者的s-TSH和s-FT4的测量值构建了一个双变量参考区间。经过Box-Cox变换,我们估计了从每对s-TSH和s-FT4到二元分布中心的马氏距离。马氏距离分布的95%百分位数被定义为二元参考区间的极限。单变量参考区间由中间95%(2.5-97.5百分位)和97.5%(1.25-98.75百分位)的参考值组成。正常甲状腺功能定义为s-TSH和s-FT4在其各自的单变量参考区间内,或95%双变量参考区间内的马氏距离。在177514例门诊成人标本中,76.6%归为双变量正常。95%和97.5%单变量参考区间对应的数据分别为68.9%和76.2%。二元95%参考区间与95%和97.5%单变量参考区间的分类一致性kappa统计量分别为0.790和0.881。我们认为双变量参考区间在临床上是最准确的,但无法证明它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
85
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry. The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.
期刊最新文献
Short-term stability of routine coagulation tests under different storage temperatures in centrifuged whole blood samples: a practical approach. CgA100 - eGFR-adjusted serum chromogranin A. Assessment of large language models in medical quizzes for clinical chemistry and laboratory management: implications and applications for healthcare artificial intelligence. Performance of enzymatic creatinine methods in the pediatric concentration range. Comparison of two automated immunoassays for quantifying ProGRP, SCC and HE4 in serum: impact on diagnostic accuracy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1