Evaluation of a combined model of Polygenic Risk Score and mismatch repair genes in the association of colorectal cancer for Norwegian cohort.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Tumori Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1177/03008916241303648
Bayram C Akdeniz, Andrew H Morris, Pål Møller, Ole Andreassen, Eivind Hovig, Mev Dominguez-Valentin
{"title":"Evaluation of a combined model of Polygenic Risk Score and mismatch repair genes in the association of colorectal cancer for Norwegian cohort.","authors":"Bayram C Akdeniz, Andrew H Morris, Pål Møller, Ole Andreassen, Eivind Hovig, Mev Dominguez-Valentin","doi":"10.1177/03008916241303648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Recent studies have shown that combining polygenic risk score (PRS) and carrier status for germline pathogenic variants in colorectal cancer (CRC) susceptibility genes (e.g. <i>MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2</i>) may increase the success of predicting CRC. This study aims to examine the prediction performance of CRC in Norwegian data using the status of pathogenic variants in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes with the available PRS models in the literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our Norwegian cohort included 805 CRC cases, 86 of which carried a pathogenic variant in one of the MMR genes. As a control group, we included 8856 individuals without a cancer diagnosis, of which 179 were carriers for a pathogenic MMR variant. We first conducted a broad experiment to determine the best-performing PRS model for the Norwegian cohort. Afterwards, we established a combined analysis with the PRS model and the status of MMR genes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 10 PRS models tested, the best-performing PRS model for the Norwegian cohort included 204 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (AUC=0.604). We also observed that the combined model of PRS and the status of MMR significantly improved the prediction performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that a combined model of a PRS and the status of MMR genes improves the prediction performance of CRC in Norwegian data.</p>","PeriodicalId":23349,"journal":{"name":"Tumori","volume":" ","pages":"3008916241303648"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tumori","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03008916241303648","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Recent studies have shown that combining polygenic risk score (PRS) and carrier status for germline pathogenic variants in colorectal cancer (CRC) susceptibility genes (e.g. MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2) may increase the success of predicting CRC. This study aims to examine the prediction performance of CRC in Norwegian data using the status of pathogenic variants in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes with the available PRS models in the literature.

Methods: Our Norwegian cohort included 805 CRC cases, 86 of which carried a pathogenic variant in one of the MMR genes. As a control group, we included 8856 individuals without a cancer diagnosis, of which 179 were carriers for a pathogenic MMR variant. We first conducted a broad experiment to determine the best-performing PRS model for the Norwegian cohort. Afterwards, we established a combined analysis with the PRS model and the status of MMR genes.

Results: Among 10 PRS models tested, the best-performing PRS model for the Norwegian cohort included 204 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (AUC=0.604). We also observed that the combined model of PRS and the status of MMR significantly improved the prediction performance.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that a combined model of a PRS and the status of MMR genes improves the prediction performance of CRC in Norwegian data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tumori
Tumori 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Tumori Journal covers all aspects of cancer science and clinical practice with a strong focus on prevention, translational medicine and clinically relevant reports. We invite the publication of randomized trials and reports on large, consecutive patient series that investigate the real impact of new techniques, drugs and devices inday-to-day clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Is tumour sequencing effective for the identification of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers? Evaluation of a combined model of Polygenic Risk Score and mismatch repair genes in the association of colorectal cancer for Norwegian cohort. Evolving perspectives: Exploring the role of artificial intelligence between clinical practice and health pastoral care. European Cancer Organisation Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care for ovarian cancer: Focus on the multidisciplinary team. Fertility and abortion: A population-based comparison between women with cancer and those in childbearing age.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1