Adequate bowel preparation of patients undergoing screening colonoscopy : Does educational status matter? A retrospective data analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1007/s00508-024-02468-5
Anna K Hinterberger, Susanne Mayer, Lena Jiricka, Elisabeth A Waldmann, Jasmin Zessner-Spitzenberg, Barbara Majcher, Lisa M Rockenbauer, Michael H Trauner, Monika Ferlitsch
{"title":"Adequate bowel preparation of patients undergoing screening colonoscopy : Does educational status matter? A retrospective data analysis.","authors":"Anna K Hinterberger, Susanne Mayer, Lena Jiricka, Elisabeth A Waldmann, Jasmin Zessner-Spitzenberg, Barbara Majcher, Lisa M Rockenbauer, Michael H Trauner, Monika Ferlitsch","doi":"10.1007/s00508-024-02468-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In order to achieve a high-quality screening colonoscopy, a high-quality bowel preparation is essential. To perform an adequate bowel cleansing patients need to understand and act on medical information, also known as health literacy. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between the patients' educational status as a proxy for health literacy and adequate bowel preparation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of data collected within the Austrian national colorectal cancer screening program from 2012 to 2022 was conducted. The database contains information on the quality of bowel preparation as well as the academic degree of the patients. Variables were used to perform a logistic regression analysis, with bowel preparation quality (based on the Aronchick scale) as the dependent variable and completed tertiary education as independent variable, and sex and age as control variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 329,778 patients aged 30-99 years were included in the analysis. Within the group of academics, 88.46% (n = 21,883) were adequately prepared whereas in the group of non-academics, 84.79% (n = 258,641) were found to have a high bowel preparation quality. The odds ratio (OR) for academics to have an adequate bowel preparation quality was 1.37 (95% confidence interval, CI 1.32-1.43; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with a tertiary education showed better bowel preparation quality than non-academics in Austria. Therefore, it is important to improve strategies on how to inform also less educated persons to facilitate a better screening colonoscopy quality and to optimize the use of resources from a clinical as well as a public health perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":23861,"journal":{"name":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-024-02468-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In order to achieve a high-quality screening colonoscopy, a high-quality bowel preparation is essential. To perform an adequate bowel cleansing patients need to understand and act on medical information, also known as health literacy. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between the patients' educational status as a proxy for health literacy and adequate bowel preparation.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of data collected within the Austrian national colorectal cancer screening program from 2012 to 2022 was conducted. The database contains information on the quality of bowel preparation as well as the academic degree of the patients. Variables were used to perform a logistic regression analysis, with bowel preparation quality (based on the Aronchick scale) as the dependent variable and completed tertiary education as independent variable, and sex and age as control variables.

Results: A total of 329,778 patients aged 30-99 years were included in the analysis. Within the group of academics, 88.46% (n = 21,883) were adequately prepared whereas in the group of non-academics, 84.79% (n = 258,641) were found to have a high bowel preparation quality. The odds ratio (OR) for academics to have an adequate bowel preparation quality was 1.37 (95% confidence interval, CI 1.32-1.43; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Patients with a tertiary education showed better bowel preparation quality than non-academics in Austria. Therefore, it is important to improve strategies on how to inform also less educated persons to facilitate a better screening colonoscopy quality and to optimize the use of resources from a clinical as well as a public health perspective.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
筛查性结肠镜检查患者的充分肠道准备:教育程度重要吗?回顾性数据分析。
背景:为了获得高质量的结肠镜筛查,高质量的肠道准备是必不可少的。为了进行充分的肠道清洁,患者需要了解并根据医疗信息采取行动,也称为卫生素养。本研究旨在分析患者的教育状况作为健康素养的代表与肠道准备的关系。方法:回顾性分析2012年至2022年奥地利国家结直肠癌筛查项目收集的数据。该数据库包含有关肠准备质量的信息以及患者的学历。变量采用logistic回归分析,以肠道准备质量(基于Aronchick量表)为因变量,完成高等教育程度为自变量,性别和年龄为控制变量。结果:共纳入329,778例30-99岁患者。在学者组中,88.46% (n = 21,883)的肠道准备充分,而在非学者组中,84.79% (n = 258,641)的肠道准备质量较高。学者肠准备质量良好的优势比(OR)为1.37(95%可信区间,CI 1.32-1.43;p 结论:奥地利受过高等教育的患者比没有受过高等教育的患者表现出更好的肠道准备质量。因此,重要的是要改进如何向受教育程度较低的人提供信息的战略,以促进更好的结肠镜检查质量,并从临床和公共卫生的角度优化资源的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
110
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is an international scientific medical journal covering the entire spectrum of clinical medicine and related areas such as ethics in medicine, public health and the history of medicine. In addition to original articles, the Journal features editorials and leading articles on newly emerging topics, review articles, case reports and a broad range of special articles. Experimental material will be considered for publication if it is directly relevant to clinical medicine. The number of international contributions has been steadily increasing. Consequently, the international reputation of the journal has grown in the past several years. Founded in 1888, the Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is certainly one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world and takes pride in having been the first publisher of landmarks in medicine.
期刊最新文献
Proposal to add a second Christmas holiday in the USA. A rare case of a rectal neuroendocrine neoplasm growing within a lipoma with ulcerative lesions. Conservative treatment of knee arthrofibrosis according to a cellular cytokine-based model : A retrospective pilot evaluation. Childhood asthma and mould in homes-A meta-analysis. Attitudes of the general population and mental health practitioners towards blended therapy in Austria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1