Kidney stone analysis: an EAU section of urolithiasis (EULIS) survey on current practices and perspectives worldwide.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY World Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1007/s00345-024-05348-9
Simone J M Stoots, Bhaskar K Somani, Otas Durutovic, Vitor Cavadas, Armin Secker, Helene Ulrik Jung, Øyvind Ulvik, Johann Ingimarsson, Tzevat Tefik, Emre Sener, Laurian Dragos, Thomas Tailly, Marcin Popiolek, Saeed Bin Hamri, Vineet Gauhar, Belthangady M Zeeshan Hameed, Juan Gomez Rivas, Naeem Bhojani, Christian Seitz, Harrie Beerlage, Robert de Jonge, Guido M Kamphuis
{"title":"Kidney stone analysis: an EAU section of urolithiasis (EULIS) survey on current practices and perspectives worldwide.","authors":"Simone J M Stoots, Bhaskar K Somani, Otas Durutovic, Vitor Cavadas, Armin Secker, Helene Ulrik Jung, Øyvind Ulvik, Johann Ingimarsson, Tzevat Tefik, Emre Sener, Laurian Dragos, Thomas Tailly, Marcin Popiolek, Saeed Bin Hamri, Vineet Gauhar, Belthangady M Zeeshan Hameed, Juan Gomez Rivas, Naeem Bhojani, Christian Seitz, Harrie Beerlage, Robert de Jonge, Guido M Kamphuis","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05348-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the current thoughts and perspectives on kidney stone analysis amongst urologists and urology residents worldwide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In October 2022 an online survey supported by the EULIS was circulated amongst urologists and urology residents worldwide. The survey was based on the current EAU guidelines regarding stone analysis and its role in urolithiasis management. Responses were collected until February 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey was completed by 351 urologists (75.4%) and 115 urology residents (24.7%). 49.1% of the participants stated that performing kidney stone analysis was of utmost importance in every patient. 91.8% were of the opinion that stone analysis changes KSD management. 62.3% of the participants declared to adhere to the guidelines. 44.7% aim to perform stone analysis in first-time stone formers. 1 out of 11 does not send stones for kidney stone analysis at all. Urologists that pursued an additional endo-urology sub-specialism performed stone analysis more frequently compared to those who were not endo-urologists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although majority of urologists consider stone analysis an essential part of kidney stone management, in reality the practice patterns regarding stone analysis deviate from the EAU guidelines. Our aim should be to bridge the knowledge gap regarding stone analysis, foster collaboration to streamline logistics regarding stone analysis and enhance the quality of care we provide for kidney stone patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05348-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the current thoughts and perspectives on kidney stone analysis amongst urologists and urology residents worldwide.

Methods: In October 2022 an online survey supported by the EULIS was circulated amongst urologists and urology residents worldwide. The survey was based on the current EAU guidelines regarding stone analysis and its role in urolithiasis management. Responses were collected until February 2023.

Results: The survey was completed by 351 urologists (75.4%) and 115 urology residents (24.7%). 49.1% of the participants stated that performing kidney stone analysis was of utmost importance in every patient. 91.8% were of the opinion that stone analysis changes KSD management. 62.3% of the participants declared to adhere to the guidelines. 44.7% aim to perform stone analysis in first-time stone formers. 1 out of 11 does not send stones for kidney stone analysis at all. Urologists that pursued an additional endo-urology sub-specialism performed stone analysis more frequently compared to those who were not endo-urologists.

Conclusion: Although majority of urologists consider stone analysis an essential part of kidney stone management, in reality the practice patterns regarding stone analysis deviate from the EAU guidelines. Our aim should be to bridge the knowledge gap regarding stone analysis, foster collaboration to streamline logistics regarding stone analysis and enhance the quality of care we provide for kidney stone patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肾结石分析:尿石症的EAU部分(EULIS)调查目前的做法和世界范围内的观点。
目的:探讨国内外泌尿科医师和住院医师对肾结石分析的看法和观点。方法:2022年10月,由EULIS支持的在线调查在全球泌尿科医生和泌尿外科住院医师中进行了分发。该调查是基于现行的尿石分析指南及其在尿石症管理中的作用。收集回复的时间截止到2023年2月。结果:共有351名泌尿科医师(75.4%)和115名泌尿科住院医师(24.7%)完成调查。49.1%的参与者表示对每个患者进行肾结石分析是最重要的。91.8%的人认为石材分析改变了KSD管理。62.3%的参与者宣布遵守指南。44.7%旨在对首次结石患者进行结石分析。1 / 11的人根本不送结石去做肾结石分析。与非泌尿外科医师相比,从事其他泌尿外科专科的泌尿科医师进行结石分析的频率更高。结论:尽管大多数泌尿科医生认为结石分析是肾结石治疗的重要组成部分,但实际上,关于结石分析的实践模式偏离了EAU指南。我们的目标应该是弥合结石分析方面的知识差距,促进合作以简化结石分析方面的物流,并提高我们为肾结石患者提供的护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
期刊最新文献
Comparing different 3D virtual models generations for the planning of robotic partial nephrectomy: the added value of perfusion volumes implement. The suggested dosage and course of thiazide diuretics on preventing recurrent urolithiasis: an upstate meta-analysis. Vacuum-assisted dedusting lithotripsy: a retrospective comparative study in high-risk patients with positive preoperative urine cultures. Crossed paths: a systematic review unveiling patterns in crossed testicular ectopia. Micro-costing analysis of Rezum™ therapy: comparing sedation and local anesthesia with the Schelin® catheter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1