[Translated article] Randomized clinical trial on the usefulness of 3D printing in intra-articular fractures of the distal radius.

P Á Sebastián Giraldo, M Elvira Soler, A Fernández Kang, F Martínez Martínez, A García López
{"title":"[Translated article] Randomized clinical trial on the usefulness of 3D printing in intra-articular fractures of the distal radius.","authors":"P Á Sebastián Giraldo, M Elvira Soler, A Fernández Kang, F Martínez Martínez, A García López","doi":"10.1016/j.recot.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We evaluated the utility of 3D printing technology for preoperative planning in the treatment of intra-articular fractures of the distal radius in relation to the improvement of surgical technique, radiological and clinical results.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 30 patients with 2B and C fractures of the AO classification were operated on by a single surgeon with a volar plate, randomly divided into two groups, 15 of them with conventional planning (Rx and CT) and 15 adding a 3D model of the fracture and the previous simulation of the intervention. Simulation time, surgical time in minutes, radioscopy time in minutes, loss of material expressed in lost screws were recorded. Clinical evaluation based PRWE questionnaire and full radiographic analysis was done for all patients with a mean follow-up of 6 months by an independent, blinded observed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were observed in the PRWE questionnaire (p=0.22), nor were we observed differences in the radiological values, except in relation to the articular step (p=0.028), which represents statistical significance, but in both groups the median was of 0.0 (0.0-0.0). We also did not see statistically significant differences in surgical times (p=0.745), radioscopy (p=0.819) or in the loss of synthesis material (p=0.779).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>3D printing has not improved the parameters studied in relation to routinely operated patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":39664,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2024.12.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated the utility of 3D printing technology for preoperative planning in the treatment of intra-articular fractures of the distal radius in relation to the improvement of surgical technique, radiological and clinical results.

Material and methods: A total of 30 patients with 2B and C fractures of the AO classification were operated on by a single surgeon with a volar plate, randomly divided into two groups, 15 of them with conventional planning (Rx and CT) and 15 adding a 3D model of the fracture and the previous simulation of the intervention. Simulation time, surgical time in minutes, radioscopy time in minutes, loss of material expressed in lost screws were recorded. Clinical evaluation based PRWE questionnaire and full radiographic analysis was done for all patients with a mean follow-up of 6 months by an independent, blinded observed.

Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in the PRWE questionnaire (p=0.22), nor were we observed differences in the radiological values, except in relation to the articular step (p=0.028), which represents statistical significance, but in both groups the median was of 0.0 (0.0-0.0). We also did not see statistically significant differences in surgical times (p=0.745), radioscopy (p=0.819) or in the loss of synthesis material (p=0.779).

Conclusions: 3D printing has not improved the parameters studied in relation to routinely operated patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
3D打印在远端骨内骨折中的效用随机临床试验。
目的:我们评估了3d打印技术在桡骨远端关节内骨折治疗的术前规划中的应用,涉及到手术技术、影像学和临床结果的改善。材料与方法:30例AO分类的2例B、C型骨折患者,由一名外科医生用掌侧钢板进行手术,随机分为两组,其中15例采用常规计划(Rx + CT), 15例采用骨折三维模型及前期模拟干预。记录模拟时间、手术时间(分钟)、放射线检查时间(分钟)、以螺钉丢失表示的材料损失。通过独立、盲法观察,对所有患者进行了平均6个月的随访,并基于PRWE问卷和完整的放射学分析进行了临床评估。结果:PRWE问卷评分差异无统计学意义(p = 0.22),放射学值差异无统计学意义(p = 0.028),但两组中位数均为0.0(0.0-0.0)。在手术时间(p = 0.745)、放射检查(p = 0.819)或合成材料损失(p = 0.779)方面,我们也没有发现统计学上的显著差异。结论:3d打印并没有改善常规手术患者的相关参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
156
审稿时长
51 weeks
期刊介绍: Es una magnífica revista para acceder a los mejores artículos de investigación en la especialidad y los casos clínicos de mayor interés. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad, y está incluida en prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
期刊最新文献
Is the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) Classification Useful to Plan Individualized Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgery for the Spanish Population? A Critical Analysis of the CPAK Classification. Impact of Lower Limb Lengthening with Telescopic Nails on Functionality and Quality of Life in Patients with Achondroplasia. Rotator cuff debridement compared with rotator cuff repair in arthroscopic treatment of calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Retrospective survival analysis of the use of uncemented modular tapered stems for revision in periprosthetic Vancouver B-type fractures. Is instability a threat to survival? Medial tab-type fasciocutaneous flap as an alternative for the management of soft tissue defects of the leg.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1