L. Perez Alamino, G. Garabano, J. Rodriguez, F. Lopreite, C. Pesciallo
{"title":"[Translated article] Total hip arthroplasty in patients under 50 years old: Does cementless fixation have better results?","authors":"L. Perez Alamino, G. Garabano, J. Rodriguez, F. Lopreite, C. Pesciallo","doi":"10.1016/j.recot.2024.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cementless fixation for hip arthroplasties has increased in the last decades, particularly in younger patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term results three different types of fixations in patients under 50<!--> <!-->years old.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cemented, hybrid and cementless fixations were assessed in patients under 50<!--> <!-->years old with a minimum follow-up of 8<!--> <!-->years. Loosening, demarcation, complications, and prosthesis survival were assessed. Functional analysis was performed with the modified Harris Hip Score and Visual analogue scale was collected.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Final series consisted in 222 patients. Significant improvement was observed regarding mHHS and VAS score in each group. We observed statistically significant difference regarding demarcation between the groups (<em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->.001). The higher rate of acetabular and femoral stem loosening was observed in the cemented (20.0%) and hybrid (18.9%) group. The lowest prosthesis survival rate after 16 years was observed in hybrid group (<em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Total hip replacement has good long-term clinical and functional outcomes. The lowest rate of prosthesis survival was observed in hybrid group with 84.2% after 16<!--> <!-->years.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39664,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","volume":"69 2","pages":"Pages T142-T149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888441524002170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Cementless fixation for hip arthroplasties has increased in the last decades, particularly in younger patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term results three different types of fixations in patients under 50 years old.
Methods
Cemented, hybrid and cementless fixations were assessed in patients under 50 years old with a minimum follow-up of 8 years. Loosening, demarcation, complications, and prosthesis survival were assessed. Functional analysis was performed with the modified Harris Hip Score and Visual analogue scale was collected.
Results
Final series consisted in 222 patients. Significant improvement was observed regarding mHHS and VAS score in each group. We observed statistically significant difference regarding demarcation between the groups (p < .001). The higher rate of acetabular and femoral stem loosening was observed in the cemented (20.0%) and hybrid (18.9%) group. The lowest prosthesis survival rate after 16 years was observed in hybrid group (p < .001).
Conclusion
Total hip replacement has good long-term clinical and functional outcomes. The lowest rate of prosthesis survival was observed in hybrid group with 84.2% after 16 years.
期刊介绍:
Es una magnífica revista para acceder a los mejores artículos de investigación en la especialidad y los casos clínicos de mayor interés. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad, y está incluida en prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.